• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

... All 5 units ...
Document
Document

...  A transaction is structured such that its writes are all performed at the end of its processing  All writes of a transaction form an atomic action; no transaction may execute while a transaction is being written  A transaction that aborts is restarted with a new timestamp  Solution 2: Limited f ...
Database-lecture 10
Database-lecture 10

... Using sub query ...
Database Isolation Levels
Database Isolation Levels

... Data inconsistency can occur due to several factors: 1. Data is accessed/updated by multiple users at the same time 2. Transition fails to perform all necessary actions due to a crash To prevent the occurrence of the above situations, a DBMS (database management system) relies on isolation levels an ...
CSIS0402 System Architecture Distributed Computing
CSIS0402 System Architecture Distributed Computing

... to have “dirty” data – Nonrepeatable read: a transaction A reads different data from the same query when it is issued multiple times and other transactions have changed the rows between reads by transaction A. A transaction that mandates repeatable reads will not see the committed changes made by ot ...
Hailstorm Press Event template
Hailstorm Press Event template

... 6a. Secured database – database password Cause: An end-user has secured a database with login security Resolution: The person converting the database must have the necessary ...
Data Integrity
Data Integrity

... During transaction execution the database may be inconsistent. A transaction ends with a Commit or an Abort When the transaction is committed, the database must be consistent. ...
King Mongkut`s University of Technology North Bangkok Faculty of
King Mongkut`s University of Technology North Bangkok Faculty of

... Lecture 1: Course Introduction Lecture 2: Concepts of Database Systems and ...
Document
Document

... both these commands may necessitate the issue of an input(BX) instruction before the assignment, if the block BX in which X resides is not already in memory. Perform read(X) while accessing X for the first time; All subsequent accesses are to the local copy. ...
TPC Benchmarks
TPC Benchmarks

... Both horizontal and vertical partitioning is allowed All partitioning must be hidden from the application  Most DBMS’s do this today for single-node horizontal partitioning.  Much harder: multiple-node transparency. For example, in a two-node cluster: ...
- Allama Iqbal Open University
- Allama Iqbal Open University

... This assignment is a research-oriented activity. You are required to obtain information relating to any business or commercial organization, write a paper of about 10 pages on the topic allotted to you. You are required to prepare two copies of Assignment # 2. Submit one copy to your tutor/teacher f ...
Top-Down Approach Process Built on Conceptual Design to
Top-Down Approach Process Built on Conceptual Design to

... DBMS are able to perform local operations independently and have no reliance on centralized service or control. The consistency of the whole system should not be affected by the behavior of the individual DBMS [6]. Three possible degrees of autonomy are tight integration, semiautonomous system, and ...
www.cathiewilson.com
www.cathiewilson.com

... • Ensures database transactions will maintain distributed database’s integrity and consistency • Ensures transaction completed only when all database sites involved complete their part • Distributed database systems require complex mechanisms to manage transactions – To ensure consistency and integr ...
Module 8: Examining Active Directory Replication
Module 8: Examining Active Directory Replication

... Writing flag to registry to trigger a consistency check and re-indexing Replicating bringing the restored server to the current database state ...
From Feb 2008 – Sept 2009.
From Feb 2008 – Sept 2009.

... Description: WR Hambrecht + Co is an investment bank committed to using technology and auction processes to provide open and fair access to financial markets for its clients.WR Hambrecht + Co is headquartered in San Francisco with offices in Boston, Chicago, London, Montreal, New York, Philadelphia ...
Lecture12 - The University of Texas at Dallas
Lecture12 - The University of Texas at Dallas

... user to log in multiple times to the same identity are inherently not single sign on. For example, an environment where users are prompted to log in to their desktop, then log in to their email using the same credentials, is not single sign on. Shared authentication schemes like OpenID, which requir ...
ppt
ppt

... • Converting SQL into the algebra ...
pptx - Cornell Computer Science
pptx - Cornell Computer Science

... Also arises if data manager crashes and restarts (hence will have lost any non-persistent intended updates and locks) Implication: even a data manager where only reads were done must participate in 2PC protocol! CS5412 Spring 2016 (Cloud Computing: Birman) ...
The Database Striptease and Informative Query Answers
The Database Striptease and Informative Query Answers

... • My life depends on ca 50 incomplete, inconsistent, replicated smalllarge databases. • As technology developer, I have not been able to locate even a basic SQL interface to start managing them. ...
Transactions
Transactions

... • Explicit in program, when app program finds a problem – e.g. when qty on hand < qty being sold ...
now
now

...  Shared memory -- processors share a common memory  Shared disk -- processors share a common disk  Shared nothing -- processors share neither a common memory ...
Chapter 12 - Distributed Database Management Systems
Chapter 12 - Distributed Database Management Systems

... • Concurrency control to manage simultaneous data access and to ensure data consistency across database fragments in the DDBMS • Transaction management to ensure the data move from one consistent state to another ...
Distributed Database Systems
Distributed Database Systems

... • horizontal fragmentation: distribution of “rows”, selection • vertical fragmentation: distribution of “columns”, projection ...
Advanced Distributed Software Architectures and Technology group
Advanced Distributed Software Architectures and Technology group

... Real systems have to be fast Real systems have to scale Real systems have to be reliable Real systems have to recover from failure when it does happen • And real systems are built by the average programmer Advanced Distributed Software Architectures and Technology group ...
PPT
PPT

...  methods to programmatically interact with SQLite database  SQLiteDatabase has methods to create, delete, execute SQL commands, and perform other common database management tasks.  database restricted to application unless create content provider  Build database on the fly in application ...
< 1 ... 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report