• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
How to use "_allow_resetlogs_corruption"
How to use "_allow_resetlogs_corruption"

... Redo Buffers xxx bytes Statement processed. ALTER DATABASE OPEN resetlogs * ORA-01194: file 1 needs more recovery to be consistent ORA-01110: data file 1: '/u01/oradata/ORCL/system01.dbf' Or: ORA-01547: warning: RECOVER succeeded but OPEN RESETLOGS would get error below ORA-01194: file 12 needs more ...
SQL Server & High Availability - e
SQL Server & High Availability - e

... Microsoft Course 2788 Designing High Availability Database Solutions Using SQL Server 2005 (3 days) • Note: this is not really a hands-on course, it is a design course (Geo, read p. xv in the 2788 courseware Introduction module) ...
18: Database System Architectures
18: Database System Architectures

...  Distributed concurrency control (and deadlock detection) required  Replication of data items required for improving data availability  Details of above in Chapter 19 ...
Coordination Avoidance in Database Systems
Coordination Avoidance in Database Systems

... by the range of database concurrency control policies. In traditional database systems, serializable isolation provides concurrent operations (transactions) with the illusion of executing in some serial order [15]. As long as individual transactions maintain correct application state, serializabilit ...
NoSQL - Courses
NoSQL - Courses

... – The results of a committed transaction survive failures ...
NAME - MindMajix
NAME - MindMajix

... E-mail:**********@gmail.com ORACLE DATABASE ADMINISTRATION ...
IsolationLevels_
IsolationLevels_

...  Tempdb is affected by the version store  RCSI provides a snapshot view of the committed data when the statement started  This can be a problem in long running queries when comparisons need to be made on the data set, and an update to the data set occurs in another query ...
PowerPoint Chapter 10
PowerPoint Chapter 10

... • Transaction log keeps track of all transactions that modify database • Concurrency control coordinates simultaneous execution of transactions • Scheduler is responsible for establishing order in which concurrent transaction operations are executed ...
Developing Tightly-Coupled Data  Mining Applications
Developing Tightly-Coupled Data Mining Applications

... Our case study uses the Apriori algorithm for mining association rules (Agrawal & Srikant 1994). The problem of mining association rules is decomposed into two subproblems: i) find all frequent itemsets that occur in a specified minimum number of transaction, called min-support; ii) use the frequent ...
Chapter 19: Distributed Databases
Chapter 19: Distributed Databases

... share no physical component.  Database systems that run on each site are independent of each ...
Document
Document

... share no physical component.  Database systems that run on each site are independent of each ...
Unix System Admin
Unix System Admin

... – State code. Used by Microsoft support engineers to find the source code location for the error. – Procedure name. The stored procedure name if the error occurred in a stored procedure. – Line number. The line number of a statement in a stored procedure that caused the error. – Performance Conditio ...
Database Schema Diagrams
Database Schema Diagrams

... following schema diagrams useful when designing custom SQL queries and reports. If you need assistance or advice writing an SQL query please contact support. By default PaperCut stores its data in an internal database format that is not accessible for external reporting. To access the database for r ...
Chapter 10
Chapter 10

... • Transaction log keeps track of all transactions that modify database • Concurrency control coordinates simultaneous execution of transactions • Scheduler is responsible for establishing order in which concurrent transaction operations are executed ...
Hyperdatabases - FTP Directory Listing
Hyperdatabases - FTP Directory Listing

... property, a process, once invoked, terminates in a welldefined state by correctly executing one of possibly several alternatives. Abort is a special option, forward recovery (e.g., partial backward recovery combined with alternative executions) another. The guaranteed termination will also be ensure ...
ch15
ch15

... A transaction is structured such that its writes are all performed at the end of its processing All writes of a transaction form an atomic action; no transaction may execute while a transaction is being written A transaction that aborts is restarted with a new timestamp Solution 2: Limited form of l ...
slides - Tsinghua-CMU Double Master Degree Program in
slides - Tsinghua-CMU Double Master Degree Program in

... From the viewpoint of the distributed DBMS, the network is merely the provider of a reliable message transmission service. “Reliable" here means that, if the network accepts a message from site X for delivery to site Y, then it will eventually deliver that message to site Y. Messages will not be gar ...
Document
Document

... – The type of lock held must be known before a lock can be granted – Three lock operations exist: READ_LOCK, WRITE_LOCK, and UNLOCK – The schema has been enhanced to allow a lock upgrade or a lock downgrade ...
T - KSU Web Home
T - KSU Web Home

... to wait for T3 to release its lock on B, while executing lock-X(A) causes T3 to wait for T4 to release its lock on A.  Such a situation is called a deadlock.  To handle a deadlock one of T3 or T4 must be rolled back and its locks released. ...
Database Persistence, Without The Performance Penalty
Database Persistence, Without The Performance Penalty

... very fast. Still, the in-memory database system with transaction logging performs many times faster than the disk-based DBMS for inserts, updates and deletes. Why is that? First, on-disk DBMSs cache large amounts of data in memory to avoid disk writes. The algorithms required to manage this cache ar ...
file4 - Department of Computer Science
file4 - Department of Computer Science

... is used in that we simply copy both relation, works regardless of the size of arguments, so there is no need to consider a two pass algorithm for Union bag. • The one pass algorithm for Us only works when at least one relation is smaller than the available main memory. So we should consider two phas ...
Comparison of Access Methods for Time-Evolving Data
Comparison of Access Methods for Time-Evolving Data

...  Methods that support transaction time maintain all their past states. This property can easily result in excessive amounts of data.  Methods that support the following two criteria will have a better performance:  Whether or not past data can be separated from the current data, so that the small ...
System R
System R

... System failure: information in main memory is lost. System R uses change log plus “shadow pages” to recover from system failure. Transaction failure: all changes made by the failing transaction must be undone. System R simply processes the change log backwards to remove all chages made by failed tra ...
database - San Diego Supercomputer Center
database - San Diego Supercomputer Center

... => Data independence – logical data independence – physical data independence ...
How to Deal with an Oversize Transaction Log
How to Deal with an Oversize Transaction Log

... are retained in the log. Using this model, a SQL Server Database Restore can restore the last database backup (e.g. from the night before) but then replay all the transactions that have been written to the database since (as records of these exist in the log). This means you could recover all of tod ...
< 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report