• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Transaction Management
Transaction Management

... continue because each is waiting for a lock it cannot obtain until the other completes (Connolly & Begg, 2007). To control deadlocks most DBMSs use a simple time-out policy. In this method the concurrency control manager aborts any transaction waiting for more than a specified time. It may however a ...
Intranet Mediator
Intranet Mediator

... University of Illinois at Chicago ...
15. Concurrency Control
15. Concurrency Control

... to wait for T3 to release its lock on B, while executing lock-X(A) causes T3 to wait for T4 to release its lock on A.  Such a situation is called a deadlock.  To handle a deadlock one of T3 or T4 must be rolled back and its locks released. ...
IMAGE`s coming of age
IMAGE`s coming of age

... changes such as this without having to kill (and then re-issue life to) my database? (The answer is “yes” with Adager.) • Why do I have to EDIT and recompile my schema, when I simply want to change the read/write capabilities of a user class? (The answer is “you don’t have to do so” with Adager.) • ...
Lab7 - Computer Science & Information Systems. BITS, Pilani
Lab7 - Computer Science & Information Systems. BITS, Pilani

...  Databases are all about sharing data, so it is common for multiple users to be accessing and even changing the same data at the same time. The simultaneous execution of operations is called concurrency. Sometimes concurrency can get us into trouble if our changes require multiple SQL statements. I ...
Chapter 19: Distributed Databases
Chapter 19: Distributed Databases

... share no physical component  Database systems that run on each site are independent of each ...
document
document

... – subsequent read transactions always get same set regardless of alteration until they call commit(), after which they get the changed data. An non-repeatable read is one where Ta reads data, Tb modifies a row that was previously read by Ta, and then Ta reads that data ...
How to copy SQL Views from Old Database to New
How to copy SQL Views from Old Database to New

... STIDistrict – Copying SQL Views to New Database • 1 ...
ppt
ppt

... where one node may be running relational database system under UNIX, another may be running object-oriented system under Windows and so on. • A transaction may run in a distributed fashion at multiple nodes. • In this execution scenario the transaction commits only when all these multiple nodes agre ...
Blotter: Low Latency Transactions for Geo
Blotter: Low Latency Transactions for Geo

... particular, the concurrency control algorithm leverages the fact that NMSI does not require a total order on the start and commit times of transactions. Such an ordering would require either synchronized clocks, which are difficult to implement, even using expensive hardware [9], or synchronization ...
Select - FSU Computer Science Department
Select - FSU Computer Science Department

... Customer c= customer.read(); rental.reset(); while (not rental.eof()) { Rental r[] = rental.readByAcctId(c.accountId); for (int i=0; i
Centralized Systems
Centralized Systems

... 1. Every data item must have a system-wide unique name. 2. It should be possible to find the location of data items efficiently. 3. It should be possible to change the location of data items transparently. 4. Each site should be able to create new data items autonomously. ...
Chapter 10
Chapter 10

... • Transaction log keeps track of all transactions that modify database • Concurrency control coordinates simultaneous execution of transactions • Scheduler is responsible for establishing order in which concurrent transaction operations are executed ...
ENACh17final-NEW
ENACh17final-NEW

... The updated item is accessed by another transaction before it is changed back to its original value. ...
Concurrency_Control_Techniques
Concurrency_Control_Techniques

... read_set of Ti has no items in common with the write_set of Tj Both the read_set and write_set of Ti have no items in common with the write_set of Tj, and Tj completes its read phase. When validating Ti, the first condition is checked first for each transaction Tj, since (1) is the simplest conditio ...
Highly Available Transactions: Virtues and
Highly Available Transactions: Virtues and

... (Section 3). While weak isolation levels do not provide serializability for general-purpose transactions, they are apparently strong enough to deliver acceptable behavior to many application programmers and are substantially stronger than the semantics provided by current highly available systems. T ...
Performance Extracts from Books Online
Performance Extracts from Books Online

... The time-out interval for the connection expires. By default, there is no time-out interval, but some applications set a time-out interval to prevent an indefinite wait. ...
Data Concurrency and Consistency
Data Concurrency and Consistency

... consistent data. Each of these statements uses a query to determine which data it will affect (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE, respectively). A SELECT statement is an explicit query and may have nested queries or a join operation. An INSERT statement can use nested queries. UPDATE and DELETE stat ...
Chapter 17: Recovery System
Chapter 17: Recovery System

...  Concurrency control: Strict 2PL :i.e. Release eXclusive locks only after commit. Why?  Logging is done as described earlier.  The checkpointing technique and actions taken on recovery have ...
Document
Document

... Deferred Database Modification (Cont.)  During recovery after a crash, a transaction needs to be redone if and ...
pdf
pdf

... Analyzing transaction code is challenging. It is not obvious what the analysis should compute, although it should be some representation of the transaction semantics that explains how inputs affects outputs. Also, we need to design general analysis algorithms that are not restricted in the same ways ...
Using Databases in C2k
Using Databases in C2k

... This approach differs from the previous approach. In this case the database is integrated into the C# solution. This means that if the C# solution is moved to another computer, the database moves with the solution. There is no need for the developer to separately export the database and import it (o ...
Tesora is Now a Part of Stratoscale | Stratoscale
Tesora is Now a Part of Stratoscale | Stratoscale

... DevOps use a common infrastructure to manage hundreds or even thousands of database instances in an economical way. Common administrative tasks include provisioning, deployment, configuration, tuning, monitoring and administration are presented in a simple, unified way. The result is a platform that ...
Database programming with Python
Database programming with Python

... Read-only attribute with a sequence of tuples, one per column in the result set. Each tuple contains the following info about the column: name, type code, display size, internal size, precision, scale, nullable. ...
IC52C4: Introduction
IC52C4: Introduction

... Refers to the distribution of control, not of data, indicating the degree to which individual DBMSs can operate independently. Requirements of an autonomous system  The local operations of the individual DBMSs are not affected by their participation in the DDBS.  The individual DBMS query processi ...
< 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report