Survey							
                            
		                
		                * Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft® Excel 5th Edition Chapter 18 Statistical Applications in Quality Management Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-1 Learning Objectives In this chapter, you learn:  The basic themes of quality management and Deming’s 14 points  The basic aspects of Six Sigma management  How to construct various control charts  Which control chart to use for a particular type of data  How to measure the capability of a process Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-2 Chapter Overview Quality Management and Tools for Improvement Philosophy of Quality Deming’s 14 Points Sigma® Six Management Tools for Quality Improvement Control Charts Process Capability p chart R chart X chart Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-3 Total Quality Management  Primary focus is on process improvement  Most variation in a process is due to the system, not the individual  Teamwork is integral to quality management  Customer satisfaction is a primary goal  Organization transformation is necessary  It is important to remove fear  Higher quality costs less Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-4 Deming’s 14 Points 1. Create a constancy of purpose toward improvement  become more competitive, stay in business, and provide jobs 2. Adopt the new philosophy  Better to improve now than to react to problems later 3. Stop depending on inspection to achieve quality -- build in quality from the start  Inspection to find defects at the end of production is too late 4. Stop awarding contracts on the basis of low bids  Better to build long-run purchaser/supplier relationships Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-5 Deming’s 14 Points 5. Improve the system continuously to improve quality and thus constantly reduce costs 6. Institute training on the job  Workers and managers must know the difference between common cause and special cause variation 7. Institute leadership  Know the difference between leadership and supervision 8. Drive out fear so that everyone may work effectively. 9. Break down barriers between departments so that people can work as a team. Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-6 Deming’s 14 Points 10. Eliminate slogans and targets for the workforce  They can create adversarial relationships 11. Eliminate quotas and management by numerical goals 12. Remove barriers to pride of workmanship 13. Institute a vigorous program of education and selfimprovement 14. Make the transformation everyone’s job Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-7 The Shewhart-Deming Cycle Plan Act The ShewhartDeming Cycle Study Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Do The key is a continuous cycle of improvement Chap 18-8 Six Sigma® Management A method for breaking a process into a series of steps:  The goal is to reduce defects and produce near perfect results  The Six Sigma® approach allows for a shift of as much as 1.5 standard deviations, so is essentially a ±4.5 standard deviation goal  The mean of a normal distribution ±4.5 standard deviations includes all but 3.4 out of a million Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-9 The Six Sigma® DMAIC Model DMAIC represents  Define -- define the problem to be solved; list costs, benefits, and impact to customer  Measure – need consistent measurements for each Critical-to-Quality characteristic  Analyze – find the root causes of defects  Improve – use experiments to determine importance of each Critical-to-Quality variable  Control – maintain gains that have been made Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-10 Theory of Control Charts  A process is a repeatable series of steps leading to a specific goal  Control Charts are used to monitor variation in a measured value from a process  Inherent variation refers to process variation that exists naturally. This variation can be reduced but not eliminated Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-11 Theory of Control Charts  Control charts indicate when changes in data are due to:  Special or assignable causes  Fluctuations not inherent to a process  Data outside control limits or trend  Represents problems to be corrected or improvements to incorporate into the process  Chance or common causes  Inherent random variations  Consist of numerous small causes of random variability Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-12 Process Variation Total Process Common Cause Special Cause = + Variation Variation Variation  Variation is natural; inherent in the world around us  No two products or service experiences are exactly the same  With a fine enough gauge, all things can be seen to differ Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-13 Process Variation Total Process Common Cause Special Cause = + Variation Variation Variation Variation is often due to differences in:  People  Machines  Materials  Methods  Measurement  Environment Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-14 Process Variation Total Process Common Cause Special Cause = + Variation Variation Variation Common cause variation  naturally occurring and expected  the result of normal variation in materials, tools, machines, operators, and the environment Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-15 Process Variation Total Process Common Cause Special Cause = + Variation Variation Variation Special cause variation  abnormal or unexpected variation  has an assignable cause  variation beyond what is considered inherent to the process Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-16 Control Limits Forming the Upper control limit (UCL) and the Lower control limit (LCL): UCL = Process Mean + 3 Standard Deviations LCL = Process Mean – 3 Standard Deviations UCL +3σ Process Average - 3σ LCL time Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-17 Control Chart Basics Special Cause Variation: Range of unexpected variability UCL Common Cause Variation: range of expected variability +3σ Process Mean - 3σ LCL time UCL = Process Mean + 3 Standard Deviations LCL = Process Mean – 3 Standard Deviations Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-18 Process Variability Special Cause of Variation: A measurement this far from the process average is very unlikely if only expected variation is present UCL ±3σ → 99.7% of process values should be in this range Process Mean LCL time UCL = Process Mean + 3 Standard Deviations LCL = Process Mean – 3 Standard Deviations Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-19 Using Control Charts Control Charts are used to check for process control If the process is found to be out of control, steps should be taken to find and eliminate the special causes of variation Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-20 In-control Process  A process is said to be in control when the control chart does not indicate any out-ofcontrol condition  Contains only common causes of variation  If the common causes of variation is small, then control chart can be used to monitor the process  If the common causes of variation is too large, you need to alter the process Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-21 Process In Control  Process in control: points are randomly distributed around the center line and all points are within the control limits UCL Process Mean LCL time Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-22 Process Not in Control Out of control conditions:  One or more points outside control limits  8 or more points in a row on one side of the center line  8 or more points in a row moving in the same direction Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-23 Process Not in Control One or more points outside control limits Eight or more points in a row on one side of the center line UCL UCL Process Average Process Average LCL LCL Eight or more points in a row moving in the same direction UCL Process Average LCL Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-24 Out-of-control Processes  When the control chart indicates an out-of- control condition (a point outside the control limits or exhibiting trend, for example)  Contains both common causes of variation and assignable causes of variation  The assignable causes of variation must be identified  If detrimental to the quality, assignable causes of variation must be removed  If increases quality, assignable causes must be incorporated into the process design Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-25 Control Chart for the Proportion: p Chart  Control chart for proportions  Is an attribute chart  Shows proportion of nonconforming items  Example -- Computer chips: Count the number of defective chips and divide by total chips inspected  Chip is either defective or not defective  Finding a defective chip can be classified a “success” Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-26 Control Chart for the Proportion: p Chart  Used with equal or unequal sample sizes (subgroups) over time  Unequal sizes should not differ by more than ±25% from average sample sizes  Easier to develop with equal sample sizes Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-27 Creating a p Chart  Calculate subgroup proportions  Graph subgroup proportions  Compute mean proportion  Compute the upper and lower control limits  Add centerline and control limits to graph Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-28 Average of Subgroup Proportions The average of subgroup proportions = p If equal sample sizes: If unequal sample sizes: k k p  pi i1 k p X i1 k i n i1 i where: where: pi = sample proportion for subgroup i Xi = the number of nonconforming k = number of subgroups of size n items in sample i ni = total number of items sampled in k samples Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-29 Computing Control Limits  The upper and lower control limits for a p chart are UCL = Average Proportion + 3 Standard Deviations LCL = Average Proportion – 3 Standard Deviations  The standard deviation for the subgroup proportions is ( p)(1  p) n Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. where: n = mean subgroup size Chap 18-30 Computing Control Limits  The upper and lower control limits for the p chart are p(1  p) UCL  p  3 n p(1  p) LCL  p  3 n Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Proportions are never negative, so if the calculated lower control limit is negative, set LCL = 0 Chap 18-31 p Chart Example You are the manager of a 500-room hotel. You want to achieve the highest level of service. For seven days, you collect data on the readiness of 200 rooms. Is the process in control? Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-32 p Chart Example Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 # Rooms 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. # Not Ready 16 7 21 17 25 19 16 Proportion 0.080 0.035 0.105 0.085 0.125 0.095 0.080 Chap 18-33 p Chart Example k p X i1 k i  n i1 16  7    16 121   .0864 200  200    200 1400 i k n n i1 k i 200  200    200   200 7 UCL  p  3 p(1  p) .0864(1  .0864)  .0864  3  .1460 200 n LCL  p  3 p(1  p) .0864(1  .0864)  .0864  3  .0268 200 n Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-34 p Chart Example P 0.15 UCL = .1460 _ p = .0864 0.10 0.05 0.00 LCL = .0268 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Day _ Individual points are distributed around p without any pattern. Any improvement in the process must come from reduction of commoncause variation, which is the responsibility of management. Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-35 Understanding Process Variability: Red Bead Experiment The experiment:  From a box with 20% red beads and 80% white beads, have “workers” scoop out 50 beads  Tell the workers their job is to get white beads  Some workers will get better over time, some will get worse Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-36 Morals of the Red Bead Experiment 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Variation is an inherent part of any process. The system is primarily responsible for worker performance. Only management can change the system. Some workers will always be above average, and some will be below. Setting unrealistic goals is detrimental to a firm’s wellbeing. Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-37 R chart and X chart  Used for measured numeric data from a process  Start with at least 20 subgroups of observed values  Subgroups usually contain 3 to 6 observations each  For the process to be in control, both the R chart and the X-bar chart must be in control Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-38 Example: Subgroups Process measurements: Subgroup measures Subgroup number Individual measurements (subgroup size = 4) Mean, X Range, R 1 15 17 15 11 14.5 6 2 12 16 9 15 13.0 7 3 17 21 18 20 19.0 4 … … … … … … … Average subgroup mean = X Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Average subgroup range = R Chap 18-39 The R Chart  Monitors variability in a process  The characteristic of interest is measured on a numerical scale  Is a variables control chart  Shows the sample range over time  Range = difference between smallest and largest values in the subgroup Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-40 The R Chart Find the mean of the subgroup ranges (the center line of the R chart) 2. Compute the upper and lower control limits for the R chart 3. Use lines to show the center and control limits on the R chart 4. Plot the successive subgroup ranges as a line chart 1. Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-41 Average of Subgroup Ranges Average of subgroup ranges: R  R i k where: Ri = ith subgroup range k = number of subgroups Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-42 R Chart Control Limits The upper and lower control limits for an R chart are UCL  D4 (R ) LCL  D3 (R ) where: D4 and D3 are taken from the table (Appendix Table E.11) for subgroup size = n Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-43 R Chart Example You are the manager of a 500-room hotel. You want to analyze the time it takes to deliver luggage to the room. For 7 days, you collect data on 5 deliveries per day. Is the variation in the process in control? Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-44 R Chart Example Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Subgroup Size 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Subgroup Average 5.32 6.59 4.89 5.70 4.07 7.34 6.79 Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Subgroup Range 3.85 4.27 3.28 2.99 3.61 5.04 4.22 Chap 18-45 R Chart Example R  R i k 3.85  4.27  ...  4.22   3.894 7 UCL  D4 (R )  (2.114)(3.894)  8.232 LCL  D3 (R )  (0)(3.894)  0 D4 and D3 are from Table E.11 (n = 5) Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-46 R Chart Control Chart Solution Minutes UCL = 8.232 8 6 4 2 0 _ R = 3.894 LCL = 0 1 2 3 4 Day 5 6 7 Conclusion: Variation is in control Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-47 The X Chart  Shows the means of successive subgroups over time  Monitors process average  Must be preceded by examination of the R chart to make sure that the variation in the process is in control Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-48 The X Chart  Compute the mean of the subgroup means (the center line of the X chart)  Compute the upper and lower control limits for the X chart  Graph the subgroup means  Add the center line and control limits to the graph Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-49 Average of Subgroup Means Average of subgroup means: X  X i k where: Xi = ith subgroup average k = number of subgroups Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-50 Computing Control Limits  The upper and lower control limits for an X chart are generally defined as UCL = Process Average + 3 Standard Deviations LCL = Process Average – 3 Standard Deviations R  Use d 2 to estimate the standard deviation of the process average, where d2 is from appendix Table E.11 n Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-51 Computing Control Limits  The upper and lower control limits for an X chart are generally defined as UCL = Process Average + 3 Standard Deviations LCL = Process Average – 3 Standard Deviations  so UCL  X  3 LCL  X  3 R d2 n R d2 n Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-52 Computing Control Limits Simplify the control limit calculations by using UCL  X  A 2 ( R ) LCL  X  A 2 ( R ) where A2 (from table E.11) = Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 3 d2 n Chap 18-53 X Chart Example You are the manager of a 500-room hotel. You want to analyze the time it takes to deliver luggage to the room. For seven days, you collect data on five deliveries per day. Is the process average in control? Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-54 X Chart Example Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Subgroup Size 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Subgroup Average 5.32 6.59 4.89 5.70 4.07 7.34 6.79 Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Subgroup Range 3.85 4.27 3.28 2.99 3.61 5.04 4.22 Chap 18-55 X Chart Control Limits Solution X  X k R  R k i i 5.32  6.59    6.79   5.814 7 3.85  4.27    4.22   3.894 7 UCL  X  A2 ( R )  5.813  (0.577)(3.894)  8.061 LCL  X  A2 ( R )  5.813  (0.577)(3.894)  3.567 A2 is from Table E.11 (n = 5) Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-56 X Chart Control Chart Solution Minutes 8 6 4 2 0 1 UCL = 8.061 _ _ X = 5.814 LCL = 3.567 2 3 4 Day 5 6 7 Conclusion: Process average is in statistical control Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-57 Process Capability  Process capability is the ability of a process to consistently meet specified customer-driven requirements  Specification limits are set by management in response to customers’ expectations  The upper specification limit (USL) is the largest value that can be obtained and still conform to customers’ expectations  The lower specification limit (LSL) is the smallest value that is still conforming Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-58 Estimating Process Capability  Must first have an in-control process  Estimate the percentage of product or service within specification  Assume the population of X values is approximately normally distributed with mean estimated by X and standard deviation estimated by R / d 2 Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-59 Estimating Process Capability For a characteristic with a LSL and a USL P(outcome will be within specifications)     USL  X   LSL  X  P(LSL  X  USL )  P Z  R R   d2  d2  Where Z is a standardized normal random variable Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-60 Estimating Process Capability For a characteristic with only an USL P(outcome will be within specifications)     USL  X    P( X  USL )  P Z   R   d2   Where Z is a standardized normal random variable Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-61 Estimating Process Capability For a characteristic with only a LSL P(outcome will be within specifications)      LSL  X   P(LSL  X)  P  Z R    d2  Where Z is a standardized normal random variable Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-62 Process Capability Example You are the manager of a 500-room hotel. You have instituted a policy that 99% of all luggage deliveries must be completed within ten minutes or less. For seven days, you collect data on five deliveries per day. You know from prior analysis that the process is in control. Is the process capable? Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-63 Process Capability Example Day Subgroup Size Subgroup Average Subgroup Range 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.32 6.59 4.89 5.70 4.07 7.34 6.79 3.85 4.27 3.28 2.99 3.61 5.04 4.22 Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-64 Process Capability Example n5 X  5.814 R  3.894 d 2  2.326 P(outcome will be within specificat ions)    10  5.814    P( X  10)  P Z  3.894     2.326    P( Z  2.50)  .9938 Therefore, we estimate that 99.38% of the luggage deliveries will be made within the ten minutes or less specification. The process is capable of meeting the 99% goal. Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-65 Capability Indices  A process capability index is an aggregate measure of a process’s ability to meet specification limits  The larger the value, the more capable a process is of meeting requirements Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-66 Cp Index A measure of potential process performance is the Cp index USL  LSL specificat ion spread Cp   process spread 6( R / d 2 ) Cp > 1 implies a process has the potential of having more than 99.73% of outcomes within specifications Cp > 2 implies a process has the potential of meeting the expectations set forth in six sigma management Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-67 CPL and CPU To measure capability in terms of actual process performance: X  LSL CPL  3(R / d2 ) CPU  USL  X 3(R / d2 ) CPL (CPU) > 1 implies that the process mean is more than 3 standard deviation away from the lower (upper) specification limit Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-68 CPL and CPU  Used for one-sided specification limits  Use CPU when a characteristic only has a UCL  Use CPL when a characteristic only has an LCL Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-69 Cpk Index  The most commonly used capability index is the Cpk index  Measures actual process performance for characteristics with two-sided specification limits Cpk = min(CPL, CPU)  Cpk = 1 indicates that the process average is 3 standard deviation away from the closest specification limit  Larger Cpk indicates greater capability of meeting the requirements, e.g., Cpk > 1.5 indicates compliance with six sigma management Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-70 Process Capability Example You are the manager of a 500-room hotel. You have instituted a policy that all luggage deliveries must be completed within ten minutes or less. For seven days, you collect data on five deliveries per day. You know from prior analysis that the process is in control. Compute an appropriate capability index for the delivery process. Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-71 Process Capability Example n5 X  5.814 R  3.894 d 2  2.326 USL  X 10  5.814 CPU    0.8335 3( R / d 2 ) 3(3.894 / 2.326) Since there is only the upper specification limit, we need to only compute CPU. The capability index for the luggage delivery process is .8337, which is less than 1. The upper specification limit is less than 3 standard deviation above the mean. Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-72 Chapter Summary In this chapter, we have  Reviewed the philosophy of quality management  Deming’s 14 points  Discussed Six Sigma® Management  Reduce defects to no more than 3.4 per million  Uses DMAIC model for process improvement  Discussed the theory of control charts  Common cause variation vs. special cause variation Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-73 Chapter Summary In this chapter, we have  Constructed and interpreted p charts  Constructed and interpreted X and R charts  Obtained and interpreted process capability measures Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 18-74