Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
PRODUCTION OF ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL (IPA) by Pınar Özbay Nihal Payza Zeynep Pekişen Deniz Uğurlar Information about... Isopropyl Alcohol Manufacturing Processes Process Selection Market Research Capacity Determination Process Flow Diagram Calculation Algorithms Results & Conclusions Isopopyl Alcohol ??? Flammable , colorless liquid with a strong and pleasant odor • Miscible with water , ethanol , acetone and benzene • Used as a solvent and cleaning fluid • • • • C3H7OH Applications Pharmaceuticals ,pesticides ,coatings ,daily-use chemicals and organic synthesis sectors As cleaning agents used on electronic devices such as contact pins, magnetic tape deck, lenses of lazers in opticak disk drivers Anti-freeze agent in fuel Preservative to replace formaldehyde in strong solutions IPA Manufacturing Processes Direct Hydration combination of water and propylene with acidic cation exchange resin catalyst Indirect Hydration Reaction of propylene with sulfuric acid with a heterogenous polymeric acid catalyst Acetone Hydrogenation of acetone Advantages of Direct Hydration Thermally stable polymeric catalyst High product quality Cost effective Environmental friendly High selectivity of IPA Process Selection Process for producing isopropyl alcohol, US 5,763,693 Criteria for this selection A final product with a composition of 90% IPA and 10% water High conversion of Direct Hydration Process High Selectivity of IPA Cost effectiveness No removal units Compressor and heat exchanger addition High data availability High pressure Less complex process No recycle of propane Market Research Largest producers: Shell, ExxonMobil, Sasol and Dow (72%) Design Capacity of IPA 35Year Data ofof IPA Consumption YearMoving Moving Data IPA Consumption in Turkey IPA Consumption in Turkeyin Turkey • TUIK DATA 3.E+07 2.E+07 2.E+07 • 5 year moving kg kg kg • 3 year moving 2.E+07 2.E+07 2.E+07 2.E+07 2.E+07 1.E+07 3 Year 5 years moving Turkey average 1.E+07 1.E+07 8.E+06 8.E+06 4.E+06 5.E+06 4.E+06 0.E+00 0.E+00 0.E+00 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 years 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 years years Design Capacity of IPA •Year difference calculation between countries • Population, GDP, growth rates and consumption of countries • Calculation of future population and GDP of Turkey GDPfuture GDPref (1 ) ( futureref ) population future populationref (1 ) ( futureref ) reference year: 2005 • Calculation of consumption of Turkey per capita GDPTurkey, future (consumption / capita) Turkey (consumption / capita) i GDPi consumptionTurkey (consumption / capita) Turkey population future • Final design capacity of Turkey PPPTurkey capacityTurkey consumptionTurkey PPP i Sample Calculation of Germany GERMANY Pop_Tur_future GDP_Tur_future cons/capita_GR cons/capita_TR Capacity_exc_ppp Capacity 2006 98407805 40876.542 0.689 0.888 87371391.217 76886824.271 2005 93039928 29980.000 0.636 0.636 59182685.196 52080762.973 2004 89121274 23634.165 0.615 0.505 44970355.489 39573912.830 2003 98876465 41964.186 0.738 1.122 110927868.378 97616524.172 2002 90596610 25879.266 0.665 0.634 57466979.218 50570941.712 2000 88994913 23449.544 0.695 0.632 56240631.825 49491756.006 1998 118130904 112192.923 0.698 3.308 390799122.429 343903227.738 1997 84297965 17377.224 0.695 0.526 44369599.653 39045247.695 1996 85200334 18430.585 0.707 0.587 49981523.006 43983740.245 1995 84192973 17257.936 0.344 0.274 23076411.355 20307241.993 1993 79178711 12291.188 0.583 0.359 28392825.774 24985686.681 1992 85349269 18609.364 0.625 0.586 50034562.052 44030414.605 Design Capacity of IPA • TUIK DATA • 5 year moving 3.E+08 2.E+08 expo expo model model linear linear 3.E+08 • 3 year moving • Projected Models • Consumption Projections of IPA poly poly log log 2.E+08 1.E+08 kg/year kg/year2.E+08 1.E+08 5.E+07 5.E+07 0.E+00 0.E+001990 1990 1995 1995 2000 2000 2005 2005 2010 2010 2015 2015 years years 2020 2020 2025 2025 2030 2030 2035 2035 The best fit Logaritmic model Design capacity of IPA in 2025 43,000 tons/year 2040 2040 Austria Austria France France Germany Germany Greece Greece Italy Italy Spain Spain Switzerland Switzerland England England Turkey Turkey Series13 Series13 Process Flow Diagram 96% propylene 4% propane Mixer Component Separator(V101) Direct Hydration Unit (Packed Bed) •Top: Propane, propylene • No side reaction •Bottom: Water, isopropanol C3 H 6 H 2 0 (CH 3 )propane, 2 OH OH Distillation(V102) •X = 0.75 •Propylene, propane recycle to mixer • adiabatic rxn at 80atm •Bottom: propane • T : 406 K 428 K propane water propane Centrifugal Compressor & Pump 90% IPA -Efficiency : 0.8 Extraction (V103) 10% water T: 403K •Top: Isopraponal, water, propane •Bottom: Water, propane recycle to mixer propane Gas-Liquid Separator(V104) T: 353 K •Top: Propane •Bottom: IPA Calculation Algorithm Heat Exchanger Component Seperator ∆H= Hinlet- Houtlet Adiabatic Compressor *W Adiabatic Reactor As a summary . . . 90% IPA as end product data availability Direct Hydration Process ˜ 75% conversion of IPA less energy consumption cost effective Isopropyl Alcohol Are these reasons satisfactory to design an IPA production plant with a capacity of 43000 tonnes per year by using this process? YES THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION