* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Slide 1
Degenerate matter wikipedia , lookup
Marcus theory wikipedia , lookup
Photoelectric effect wikipedia , lookup
Heat transfer physics wikipedia , lookup
Auger electron spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Nanofluidic circuitry wikipedia , lookup
Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup
Photoredox catalysis wikipedia , lookup
Scanning tunneling spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Single-electron Devices Speaker: Qiaoyan Yu qiaoyan@ece.rochester.edu ECE423 12-16-2006 Agenda Milestone  Motivations  New characteristics  Single-electron transistor (SET)  Challenges  Conclusions  2 Milestone In 1909, Millikan first illustrated the manipulation of single electrons.  In 1985, Dmitri Averin & Konstantin Likharev proposed single-electron transistor.  In 1987, Theodore Fulton & Gerald Doald at Bell lab fabricated and demonstrated SET.  3 Motivation  Power consumption challenges high performance and high density chip design   Faster and more information processing resulting in generating more heat flux Reduce the corresponding charge per bit! Single-electron Device!!! 4 SED new characteristics  Exploit the quantum effect of tunneling   Charge doest not flow continuously   Control and measure the movement of single electron Instead in a quantized way Extremely high charge sensitivity  High precise for charge measurement 5 Single-electron transistor (SET) Architecture  Equivalent circuit  Operation principle  I-V curve  SET VS. MOSFET  6 Architecture Tunnel junctions q island Source +q1 Vb V2 V1 -q1 +q2 C1 gate Drain -q2 C2 Cg Vg 7 Equivalent circuit 8 Operation principle 9 Operation principle 10 Operation principle 11 I-V curve 12 SET vs. MOSFET  Structure   Size   Periodic vs. not periodic Sensitivity   Coulomb blockade vs. electron diffusion Threshold voltage & source-drain current   Extremely small vs. large (although scaled down) Main physical principle   Two tunneling barrier vs. inversion channel High vs. low (10000X) Power  Low vs. high 13 SED challenges Difficult to precisely control the device implementation  Characteristic of the device varies significantly from location to location  Suffer from “offset charges”   Randomly fluctuation of control signal 14 Conclusions      Because of natural small dimension, SED is a potential solution for continue silicon scaling. It is not clear that SET replaces FET. It is certain that quantum properties of electrons will be crucial in the design of electron devices. Electron beam lithography and scanning probe techniques offer the best prospects for the future. Some more esoteric techniques based on atomic particle deposition and colloid chemistry may also provide some benefits. 15 The End Thank You! Any questions? 16
 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                            ![NAME: Quiz #5: Phys142 1. [4pts] Find the resulting current through](http://s1.studyres.com/store/data/006404813_1-90fcf53f79a7b619eafe061618bfacc1-150x150.png) 
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                            