* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Multiple-Output, Variable-Output DC Power Supply
Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup
Solar micro-inverter wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Power factor wikipedia , lookup
Ground (electricity) wikipedia , lookup
Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Power over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup
Audio power wikipedia , lookup
Electrification wikipedia , lookup
Electric power system wikipedia , lookup
Distribution management system wikipedia , lookup
Power inverter wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Power supply wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Multiple-Output, Variable-Output DC Power Supply Project Plan May03-22 Team Members: Peter Holm Erik Johnson Joel Jorgensen Philip Schulz Clients – Dr. Patterson, Dr. Lamont Faculty Advisor – Dr. Allan Potter 11/19/2002 i 1.2. Table of Contents 1.2. Table of Contents .................................................................................... ii 1.4. List of Figures ................................................................................................ iv 1.5. List of Tables ................................................................................................... v 2.1. Abstract .............................................................................................................. 1 3.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 General Background ....................................................................................................... 1 Technical Problem .......................................................................................................... 2 Operating Environment ................................................................................................... 2 Intended User and Use .................................................................................................... 3 Assumptions.................................................................................................................... 3 Limitations ...................................................................................................................... 3 3.2. Design Requirements ............................................................................ 3 Design Objectives ........................................................................................................... 3 Functional Requirements ................................................................................................ 4 Design Constraints .......................................................................................................... 5 Measurable Milestones ................................................................................................... 5 3.3. End-Product Description ................................................................... 5 3.4. Approach and Design ................................................................................ 6 Technical Approaches ..................................................................................................... 6 Technical Design ............................................................................................................ 7 Testing Description ......................................................................................................... 8 Risks and Risk Management ........................................................................................... 8 Recommendation for Continued Work ........................................................................... 8 3.5. Financial Budget ........................................................................................... 8 3.6. Personal Effort Budget ............................................................................. 9 3.7. Project Schedule ........................................................................................... 9 4.1. Project Team Information .................................................................... 12 Clients ........................................................................................................................... 12 ii John Lamont.............................................................................................................. 12 Ralph Patterson III .................................................................................................... 12 Faculty Advisor ............................................................................................................. 13 Al Potter .................................................................................................................... 13 Team Members ............................................................................................................. 13 Erik Johnson.............................................................................................................. 13 Joel Jorgensen ........................................................................................................... 13 Peter Holm ................................................................................................................ 13 Philip Schulz ............................................................................................................. 13 4.2. Summary .................................................................................................... 14 4.3. References ....................................................................................................... 14 4.4. Appendices ..................................................................................................... 14 iii 1.4. List of Figures Multiple-Output, Variable-Output DC Power Supply.......................................................12 Voltage Regulator and Surrounding Circuitry...................................................................13 Gantt Chart Part 1 …………………………………………………………………..…...16 Gantt Chart Part 2 ……………………………………………………………………….17 iv 1.5. List of Tables Total Number of Terminals on the Power Supply……………………………………......7 Financial Budget ………………………………………………………………………...11 Personal Effort Budget ………………………………………………………………….11 v vi 2.1. Abstract A large number of devices require battery power of a wide variety of voltages. These voltages include 1.5V, 3.0V, 4.5V, 5.0V, 6V, 9V, 12V, 15V, 18V, and 24V. Although AC-to-DC converters can be found in these voltages, making use of eight or more separate converters to cover the desired voltage range is expensive and cumbersome. A single power supply is needed which can output a large number of voltages simultaneously and at unique voltage potentials, at a relatively low cost. The variable output, multiple output DC power supply described here will have eight separate voltage terminals, each of which is capable of functioning simultaneously. This power supply is intended to be suitable for use in design and research labs, and thus will be small, rugged, low-cost, and simple. Efficiency and cost are two important goals for this project. This power supply will provide design and research oriented individuals with a low-cost device which can be used for a variety of applications. 3.1. Introduction General Background A power supply will be developed with terminals for supplying the following: +1.5V, 3.0V, +3.2V, +4.5V, 5.0V, +6.0V, +7.5V, +9.0V, 12.0V, +15.0V, +18.0V, and +24.0V. These voltages will be precise within 1% of their intended values. The goal of this project is build the best possible power supply for as cheap as possible. The voltages supplied will be split up into two separate groups: positive-only and plusminus voltages. There will be four rotary voltage-selector switches used to output four separate voltages, two positive-only and two plus-minus. At any given time, all four of the outputs can be used simultaneously. One of the grounds for the positive-only voltages will be separated from the grounds for the plus-minus voltages and the other positive-only voltage, allowing it to become floating (not connected to earth ground, at a potential other than 0V DC). For each selectable voltage output there will be two terminals capable of supplying that specific voltage. The total number of output terminals can be found in Table X. Switch PositiveOnly #1 Positive- No. of Positive Voltage Outputs 1 No. of Negative Voltage Outputs 0 Total No. of Terminals 2 1 0 2 1 Only #2 PlusMinus #1 PlusMinus #2 1 1 4 1 1 4 Table 1: Total Number of Terminals on the Power Supply, Excluding Ground Terminals Each output will be limited to 1 amp of current, or approximately 100 watts of total power output from the supply. This should ensure that overloading of the exterior circuit would not occur. Included in the power supply will be a voltmeter and an ammeter that can be switched between the four voltage outputs. A wattmeter is also being looked into in order to monitor the power output. Technical Problem The power supply will be built with a circuit board and basic circuit components, including transformers, resistors, inductors, capacitors, and diodes. Complicated components, such as the LM317T adjustable output, positive voltage regulator, will be purchased separately. The basic technical problem faced in this project is determining how to implement a circuit within the design parameters that will fulfill our objectives. Each non-structural design requirement will be realized by some combination of electronic circuitry. This will involve extensive use of CAD software in testing several different implementations. After a rigorous design has been decided upon and tested, the components will be purchased and attached to the board. In order to make the face of the power supply attractive, yet easy to navigate, a dimension of approximately sixty square-inches will be utilized. This has been found to be more than enough area to include all switches, displays, and terminals. There will be basically two separate circuits included in the power supply design. One will drive the positive-only voltages and the other will drive the plus-minus voltages. Operating Environment The power supply is designed for use in standard laboratory conditions: indoor at approximately 24 C room temperature. Also, the power supply is designed for use in the United States where the wall voltage is 120V at 60Hz. A metal casing will surround the power supply’s inner circuitry to protect it from light liquid us spills, short drops, and slight impact. 2 Intended User and Use The power supply is intended for use by research and design students. Its primary function is to stably produce a small amount of current at a wide variety of voltages so that the user can provide several electronic devices simultaneously with voltage output from the power supply. Assumptions The following is a list of the known assumptions: All four outputs can be used simultaneously via a maximum of 12 voltage terminals. The power supply will be used indoors at room temperature away from liquid of any kind The power supply will be powered by 120V at 60Hz Limitations The following is a list of the power supply’s limitations: Current will be limited to one amp max from any output, with a tolerance of 1%. Total cost of the design is to be minimal, so precision will be affected. The power supply will be useless outside of the United States. 3.2. Design Requirements Design Objectives The following is a list of the design objectives for this project. These objectives will be referenced while designing the supply and building our implementation. They will also be used in evaluating success after the project is finished. Power will be provided by a plug to a standard wall outlet, providing an input voltage of 120 volts RMS at 60HZ. The following voltages will be available: +1.5, 3.0, +3.2, +4.5, 5.0, +6.0, +7.5, +9.0, 12.0, +15.0, +18.0, +24.0. These will be DC voltages and will operate within 1% of their stated potential. The power supply will provide four unique voltages and a common ground at any given time. Two of these will be selected from 3.0, 5.0, or 12.0; these will subsequently be referred to as plus/minus voltages. The other two voltages will 3 be selected from +1.5, +3.2, +4.5, +6.0, +7.5, +9.0, +15.0, +18.0, or +24.0; these will subsequently be referred to as positive voltages. The power supply will have twenty-one output terminals. Each of the plus/minus voltages will have three pairs of terminals (positive, negative, and ground). Each of the positive voltages will have two pairs of terminals (positive and ground). One terminal will be provided for the common ground. A current limiting feature will prevent the current from exceeding 1 Amp at any voltage level. This feature will function in the background and be provided by internal circuitry. Will provide current, voltage, and power meters. These meters will monitor one terminal pair at a time, as selected by the user. Fuses will be included for the protection of the power supply. There will be one two fuses each for the plus/minus sets of terminals (one for the positive and one for the negative), one fuse each for the two sets of positive terminals, and one main fuse for the entire supply. The power supply will be small enough to be convenient in a design or research lab. The size of this power supply is expected to be less than one cubic foot. Standard power supplies will be examined for general size guidelines. Functional Requirements The following is a list of the functional requirements for this project. These requirements will be referenced while designing and constructing the power supply. They will also be used in evaluating success after the project is finished. There will be a power switch with an on and off position. There will be a rotary selector switch for each of the four main sets of terminals. The voltage switches will allow the user to select between the available voltages for that terminal. There will be a rotary selector switch to allow the user to determine which of the terminals to monitor with the current, voltage, and power meters. 4 Design Constraints The following is a list of the design constraints for this project. These constraints will be referenced while designing and constructing the power supply. They will also be used in evaluating success after the project is finished. The cost should be around $25 and should not exceed $50. The power supply must be easy to use. Drawing power from it should be as simple as connecting the wires to the terminals of the desired voltages. The power supply must be reliable and rugged. It should be able to withstand somewhat severe operating conditions (such as having the terminals accidentally shorted or being dropped short distances) without sustaining permanent damage. It must also be able to provide its outputs to within the specified tolerances. The power supply will have a maximum power consumption of 100W. Measurable Milestones The following is a list of the measureable milestones for this project. These milestones will be used to evalutate project success. Percent ratio of final cost to cost of retail power supply with similar characteristics. Final cost only includes the cost of individual components, to be compared about what could have been purchased for that price. Success here indicates that contracting a senior design group to design and build this supply was more economical to Dr. Lamont and Dr. Patterson than purchasing one on the market. Percent ratio of final weight and size to average power supply weight and size. One of the goals of this project is to develop a power supply which is portable in a lab environment. Comparing the final product’s weight and size to existing power supplies provides a moderately accurate quantitative estimate of success in this area. Percent ratio of actual power consumption to maximum power consumption of 100W. Power consumption over 100W would excede design constraints. Each percent under 100W indicates a measureable degree of success. 3.3. End-Product Description The MOVO (Multiple-Output, Variable-Output) DC Power Supply is designed for use in research and development labs. It provides several common battery voltages (+1.5, 3.0, +3.2, +4.5, 5.0, +6.0, +7.5, +9.0, 12.0, +15.0, +18.0, +24.0) for testing products. The user will be able to choose the desired voltage by rotary knobs on the front face of the power supply. It contains a current limiting feature that prevents it from drawing more than 1 Amp for any given voltage. The user will be able to see the voltage, current, and wattage use by a digital readout on the front of the power supply. It is low cost, easy to use, and its rugged design enables it to endure the hazards of a development environment. Finally, the MOVO DC Power Supply meets UL safety standards. 5 Figure 1: Multiple-Output, Variable-Output DC Power Supply 3.4. Approach and Design Technical Approaches The most difficult constraint to work around will be the target price of twenty-five to fifty dollars. After some research it was found that most DC power supplies sell for more than $100. Because of our lower cost, many of the design parameters will be focused around cost-effectiveness. There are four key requirements given by Dr. Lamont and Dr. Patterson: fifteen separate voltage levels, short circuit protection, variable current (from 0A to 1A), and the aforementioned target cost. Safety will be emphasized in the project design. Short circuit protection will be incoporated. Following safety, the design will focus on providing the voltages reliably. Having variable current is a very convenient option and will also be included if time and resources allow. There were three main approaches considered. The first was to use one main transformer to step the voltage down, and then use voltage regulators to obtain the desired voltages from the stepped-down voltage. After that, the outputs would be directed through the selector switches for the output and monitoring. The next approach was to use one main transformer with several taps to obtain the desired voltages. The largest voltage was to be monitored, and a feedback loop set up to ensure that this voltage was held to a very tight tolerance (within 1%). The outputs of the taps would then be directed through the switches for the output and monitoring selection. 6 The third approach was to use one main transformer and then several smaller transformers to get the voltages down to approximately the desired levels. The outputs of these transformers would then be sent through voltage regulators to obtain exactly the desired voltages, which would then be connected to the switches to select the actual output and monitoring. Several approaches were considered for the outputs as well, such as having a pair of terminals for each voltage or having a smaller number of terminals and then allowing the user to switch between the voltages for each set of terminals. Technical Design After extensive searching, voltage regulators were found which could be used to achieve our wide range of voltage outputs at the extremely low cost of $.30 each. This is the LM317T voltage regulator in Figure 2. However, these voltage regulators dissipate large amounts of power, so cooling will be an important consideration. To help reduce the power dissipation in the voltage regulators, it was decided to use a series of transformers to bring the input voltage down to the approximate output levels. These stepped down voltages will then be passed into the voltage regulator and rectification circuitry. With this information at hand, the third approach was determined to be the most feasible. Figure 2 below is a schematic of the circuitry surrounding the voltage regulators for each of the voltages. Not shown is the input transformer to step down the wall voltage, and the additional transformers to step it down further and reduce the power dissipation in each regulator. D5 D3 in_1 D1 LM317T Vreg IN C1 C2 D6 D2 2200uF in_2 D4 out OUT 0.1uF R1 240Ohm_5% C4 1uF C3 Key = a R2a 5K_LIN 50% 10uF R2b R 2a // R 2b VOUT 1.25V 1 240 Figure 2: Voltage Regulator and Surrounding Circuitry 7 Testing Description Testing on the circuit will be conducted regularly as well as when a component is constructed. First, the component alone will be tested. Next, the component will be tested in the power supply circuit to eliminate wasted time spent analyzing the entire circuit for errors. The final testing process will ensure the converter will be rugged, as well as meet UL (or equivalent) safety standards. Each output will be tested to make sure that its output is within one percent of its intended value. To do this, each output will be tested by stepping through the voltages and using a variable resistor to simulate a wide range of possible loads from almost open (very high resistance) to completely short circuited (almost no resistance). A pair of meters will be connected to the terminals to monitor the output for each of these loads. The power supply meters will be tested by connecting another set of meters at the terminals and observing whether the values agree as the voltages are switched through. The fuses will be tested by deliberately overloading the power supply and observing whether they break the circuit before the current gets too high. Risks and Risk Management It is no longer possible to drop EE491, so the risk of losing a partner is very minimal. However, several new risks have been identified. This design is dependent upon acquiring and successfully installing a very specific part, the LM317 voltage regulator. If this part is unavailable or does not work as expected, the entire design will need to be modified. Additionally, this part will be dissipating large amounts of heat. Adequete heat sinking will be required, and if that is determined to be unfeasible the design will again need to be modified. The functionality this part provides was very hard to find at a reasonable price. It is entirely possible that keeping the design within safety and performance and price specifications will be impossible. If this is the case, major changes will have to be made, which will incur large penalties in cost and time. Recommendation for Continued Work There are many possibilities for continued work with this power supply. One option would be to increase the power supply’s ability to handle large amounts of power. This would enable each of the terminals to supply current independently of the terminal that it is paired with. On a similar note, the power supply could be modified or redesigned to handle a higher maximum current. Another feature that could be added would be to make the voltage selectable from a continuous range of voltages instead of from a discrete list of choices. This would greatly improve the power supply’s versatility. Power factor correction could also be added to increase the power supply’s efficiency. 3.5. Financial Budget The following table summarizes the expenses which shall be incurred during the development process. 8 Item Poster Case Transformer Resistors/capacitors/diodes Cooling fan Switches, dials, and terminals Meters ($10.25 each) Variable voltage regulator Total Table 2: Financial Budget Original Estimated Cost $50.00 $14.99 $35.53 $26.80 $9.99 $25.00 $30.75 $4.00 $197.07 Cost to Date $50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 3.6. Personal Effort Budget Person Paper Research work Erik Johnson 8 21 Joel Jorgensen 5 25 Peter Holm 9 15 Philip Schulz 7 18 Total 29 79 Actual to date 27 45 Table 3: Personal Effort Budget Design Construction Total 32 34 25 28 119 12 12 13 14 12 51 0 73 77 63 65 278 84 Actual to date 19 22 23 20 84 3.7. Project Schedule The diagram below is a Gantt chart, which shows the projected schedule for this project. 9 Figure 3: Gantt chart part 1 10 Figure 4: Gantt chart part 2 11 4.1. Project Team Information Clients John Lamont Office Address: 324 Town Engr. Ames, IA 50011 Office Phone #: (515) 294-3600 Email: jwlamont@iastate.edu Department: Electrical and Computer Engineering Ralph Patterson III Office Address: 326 Town Engr. Ames, IA 50011 Office Phone #: (515) 294-2428 Email: repiii@iastate.edu Department: Electrical and Computer Engineering 12 Faculty Advisor Al Potter Address: 2019 Taylor Cir. Ames, IA 50010 Phone #: (515) 233-4688 Email: agpotter@yahoo.com Department: Electrical and Computer Engineering Team Members Erik Johnson Address: 125 Campus Ave. #14 Ames, IA 50010 Phone #: (515) 292-8314 Email: erikj@iastate.edu Department: Electrical Engineering Joel Jorgensen Address: 5132 Frederiksen Ct. Ames, IA 50010 Phone #: (515) 572-7914 Email: jmjorgen@iatstate.edu Department: Electrical Engineering Peter Holm Address: 3233 Frederiksen Ct. Ames, IA 50010 Phone #: (515) 572-8024 Email: pholm@iastate.edu Department: Computer Engineering Philip Schulz Address: 1316 S. Duff Ave. Trailer #11 Ames, IA 50010 Phone #: (319) 850-0263 Email: pschulz@iastate.edu Department: Electrical Engineering 13 4.2. Summary This is an ambitious project, but the research done indicates that it should be successful. With relatively low cost voltage regulators, the rest of the components should be cheap enough to fall within a reasonable range of the specified price. This power supply will be an asset to the senior design lab. With a wide variety of voltages which are unavailable through other power supplies, this project should allow students to test other projects much more conveniently. If the project fits within the budget, these feature will have been provided to the design lab at an excellent price. 4.3. References 4.4. Appendices 14