Download Chapter 5 Review

Chapter 5
Link Layer
and LANs
Computer Networking:
A Top Down Approach
Jim Kurose, Keith Ross
Addison-Wesley.
5: DataLink Layer
5-1
Link Layer Services
 framing, link access:



encapsulate datagram into frame, adding header, trailer
channel access if shared medium
“MAC” addresses used in frame headers to identify
source, dest
• different from IP address!
 reliable delivery between adjacent nodes
 we learned how to do this already (chapter 3)!
 seldom used on low bit-error link (fiber, some twisted
pair)
 wireless links: high error rates
• Q: why both link-level and end-end reliability?
5: DataLink Layer
5-2
Link Layer Services (more)
 flow control:

pacing between adjacent sending and receiving nodes
 error detection:


errors caused by signal attenuation, noise.
receiver detects presence of errors:
• signals sender for retransmission or drops frame
 error correction:

receiver identifies and corrects bit error(s) without
resorting to retransmission
 half-duplex and full-duplex
 with half duplex, nodes at both ends of link can transmit,
but not at same time
5: DataLink Layer
5-3
Error Detection
EDC= Error Detection and Correction bits (redundancy)
D = Data protected by error checking, may include header fields
• Error detection not 100% reliable!
• protocol may miss some errors, but rarely
• larger EDC field yields better detection and correction
otherwise
5: DataLink Layer
5-4
Parity Checking
Single Bit Parity:
Detect single bit errors
Two Dimensional Bit Parity:
Detect and correct single bit errors
Odd parity scheme
Parity bit value is chosen
such that number of 1’s send
is odd.
Ex. 9 1’s in the data, so the
parity bit is ‘0’.
0
0
(even parity)
5: DataLink Layer
5-5
Internet checksum (review)
Goal: detect “errors” (e.g., flipped bits) in transmitted
packet (note: checkwum used at transport layer,
CRC at data link layer)
Receiver:
Sender:
 treat segment contents
as sequence of 16-bit
integers
 checksum: addition (1’s
complement sum) of
segment contents
 sender puts checksum
value into UDP checksum
field
 compute checksum of
received segment
 check if computed checksum
equals checksum field value:
 NO - error detected
 YES - no error detected.
But maybe errors
nonetheless?
5: DataLink Layer
5-6
Multiple Access Links and Protocols
Two types of “links”:
 point-to-point
 PPP for dial-up access
 point-to-point link between Ethernet switch and host
 broadcast (shared wire or medium)
 old-fashioned Ethernet
 upstream HFC (hybrid fiber-coaxial cable)
 802.11 wireless LAN
shared wire (e.g.,
cabled Ethernet)
shared RF
(e.g., 802.11 WiFi)
shared RF
(satellite)
5: DataLink Layer
5-7
MAC Protocols: a taxonomy
Three broad classes:
 Channel Partitioning


divide channel into smaller “pieces” (time slots,
frequency, code)
allocate piece to node for exclusive use
 Random Access
 channel not divided, allow collisions
 “recover” from collisions
 “Taking turns”
 nodes take turns, but nodes with more to send can take
longer turns
5: DataLink Layer
5-8
Channel Partitioning MAC protocols: TDMA
TDMA: time division multiple access
 access to channel in "rounds"
 each station gets fixed length slot (length = pkt
trans time) in each round
 unused slots go idle
 example: 6-station LAN, 1,3,4 have pkt, slots 2,5,6
idle
6-slot
frame
1
3
4
1
3
4
5: DataLink Layer
5-9
Channel Partitioning MAC protocols: FDMA
FDMA: frequency division multiple access
 channel spectrum divided into frequency bands
 each station assigned fixed frequency band
 unused transmission time in frequency bands go idle
 example: 6-station LAN, 1,3,4 have pkt, frequency
FDM cable
frequency bands
bands 2,5,6 idle
5: DataLink Layer
5-10
Random Access Protocols
 When node has packet to send
 transmit at full channel data rate R.
 no a priori coordination among nodes
 two or more transmitting nodes ➜ “collision”,
 random access MAC protocol specifies:
 how to detect collisions (e.g., no Ack, or bad reception)
 how to recover from collisions (e.g., via delayed
retransmissions)
 Examples of random access MAC protocols:
 ALOHA
 slotted ALOHA
 CSMA: Carrier Sense Multiple Access,
 CSMA/CD (Ethernet): CSMA with collision detection
 CSMA/CA (WiFi 802.11): CSMA with collision avoidance
5: DataLink Layer
5-11
Random MAC (Medium Access Control) Techniques
 ALOHA (‘70) [packet radio network]
A station sends whenever it has a packet/frame
 Listens for round-trip-time delay for Ack
 If no Ack then re-send packet/frame after
random delay

• too short  more collisions
• too long  under utilization
No carrier sense is used
 If two stations transmit about the same time
frames collide
 Utilization of ALOHA is low ~18%

5: DataLink Layer
5-12
Pure (unslotted) ALOHA
 unslotted Aloha: simple, no synchronization
 when frame first arrives
 transmit immediately
 collision probability increases:
 frame sent at t0 collides with other frames sent in [t0-1,t0+1]
5: DataLink Layer
5-13
Pure Aloha efficiency
P(success by given node) = P(node transmits) .
P(no other node transmits in [t0-1,t0] .
P(no other node transmits in [t0,t0+1]
= p . (1-p)N-1 . (1-p)N-1
= p . (1-p)2(N-1)
… choosing optimum p and then letting n -> infty ...
= 1/(2e) = .18
Very bad, can we do better?
5: DataLink Layer
5-14
Slotted ALOHA
Assumptions:
 all frames same size
 time divided into equal
size slots (time to
transmit 1 frame)
 nodes start to transmit
only slot beginning
 nodes are synchronized
 if 2 or more nodes
transmit in slot, all
nodes detect collision
Operation:
 when node obtains fresh
frame, transmits in next
slot
 if no collision: node can
send new frame in next
slot
 if collision: node
retransmits frame in
each subsequent slot
with prob. p until
success
5: DataLink Layer
5-15
Slotted ALOHA
Pros
 single active node can
continuously transmit
at full rate of channel
 highly decentralized:
only slots in nodes
need to be in sync
 simple
Cons
 collisions, wasting slots
 idle slots
 nodes may be able to
detect collision in less
than time to transmit
packet
 clock synchronization
5: DataLink Layer
5-16
Slotted Aloha efficiency
Efficiency : long-run
fraction of successful slots
(many nodes, all with many
frames to send)
 suppose: N nodes with
many frames to send,
each transmits in slot
with probability p
 prob that given node
has success in a slot =
p(1-p)N-1
 prob that any node has
a success = Np(1-p)N-1
 max efficiency: find
p* that maximizes
Np(1-p)N-1
 for many nodes, take
limit of Np*(1-p*)N-1
as N goes to infinity,
gives:
Max efficiency = 1/e = .37
At best: channel
used for useful
transmissions 37%
of time!
5: DataLink Layer
!
5-17
CSMA (Carrier Sense Multiple Access)
CSMA: listen before transmit:
If channel sensed idle: transmit entire frame
 If channel sensed busy, defer transmission
5: DataLink Layer
5-18
CSMA collisions
spatial layout of nodes
collisions can still occur:
propagation delay means
two nodes may not hear
each other’s transmission
collision:
entire packet transmission
time wasted
note:
role of distance & propagation
delay in determining collision
probability
5: DataLink Layer
5-19
CSMA/CD (Collision Detection)
CSMA/CD: carrier sensing, deferral as in CSMA
collisions detected within short time
 colliding transmissions aborted, reducing channel
wastage

 collision detection:
 easy in wired LANs: measure signal strengths,
compare transmitted, received signals
 difficult in wireless LANs: received signal strength
overwhelmed by local transmission strength (use
CSMA/CA: we’ll get back to that in Ch 6)
 human analogy: the polite conversationalist
5: DataLink Layer
5-20
CSMA/CD collision detection
CSMA
CSMA/CD
5: DataLink Layer
5-21
Shared meduim bus
5: DataLink Layer
5-22
More on CSMA/CD and Ethernet
- uses broadcast and filtration: all stations
on the bus receive the frame, but only the
station with the appropriate data link D-L
(MAC) destination address picks up the
frame. For multicast, filteration may be
done at the D-L layer or at the network
layer (with more overhead)
5: DataLink Layer
5-23
Analyzing CSMA/CD
Collision
Collision
Av. Time wasted ~ 5 Prop
Success
TRANS
- Utilization or ‘efficiency’ is fraction of the
time used for useful/successful data
transmission
5: DataLink Layer
5-24
- u=TRANS/(TRANS+wasted)=TRANS/(TRA
NS+5PROP)=1/(1+5a), where
a=PROP/TRANS
- if a is small, stations learn about collisions
and u increases
- if a is large, then u decreases
1
1
efficiency 

,
1 5t prop /t trans 1 5a
a
t prop
ttrans
5: DataLink Layer
5-25
5: DataLink Layer
5-26
Collision detection in Wireless
 Need special equipment to detect collision
at receiver
 We care about the collision at the reciever
1. no-collision detected at sender but collision
detected at receiver
 2. collision at sender but no collision at receiver

 Neighborhood of sender and receiver are
not the same (it’s not a shared wire, but
define relatively (locally) to a node [hidden
terminal problem]
 … more later
5: DataLink Layer
5-27
“Taking Turns” MAC protocols
channel partitioning MAC protocols:
 share channel efficiently and fairly at high load
 inefficient at low load: delay in channel access,
1/N bandwidth allocated even if only 1 active
node!
Random access MAC protocols
 efficient at low load: single node can fully
utilize channel
 high load: collision overhead
“taking turns” protocols
look for best of both worlds!
5: DataLink Layer
5-28
“Taking Turns” MAC protocols
Polling:
 master node
“invites” slave nodes
to transmit in turn
 typically used with
“dumb” slave devices
 concerns:



polling overhead
latency
single point of
failure (master)
data
poll
master
data
slaves
5: DataLink Layer
5-29
“Taking Turns” MAC protocols
Token passing:
 control token passed
from one node to next
sequentially.
 token message
 concerns:



token overhead
latency
single point of failure
(token)
T
(nothing
to send)
T
data
5: DataLink Layer
5-30
Release after reception:
utilization analysis
Prop
token
Prop 12
Prop
Prop N1
- u=useful time/total time(useful+wasted)
- u=T1+T2+…+TN/[T1+T2+..+TN+(N+1)PROP]
- a=PROP/TRANS=PROP/E(Tn), where E(Tn) is
the expected (average) transmission of a node
5: DataLink Layer
5-31
 u=Ti/(Ti+(N+1)PROP)
~1/(1+PROP/E(Tn)), where E(Tn)= Ti/N
 u=1/(1+a) for token ring
 [compared to Ethernet u=1/(1+5a)]
5: DataLink Layer
5-32
5: DataLink Layer
5-33
 As the number of stations increases, less
time for token passing, and u increases
 for release after transmission u=1/(1+a/N),
where N is the number of stations
5: DataLink Layer
5-34
Ethernet (IEEE 802.3, uses
CSMA/CD)
“dominant” wired LAN technology:
 cheap $20 for NIC
 first widely used LAN technology
 simpler, cheaper than token LANs and ATM
 kept up with speed race: 10 Mbps – 10 Gbps
Metcalfe’s Ethernet
sketch
5: DataLink Layer
5-35
Star topology
 bus topology popular through mid 90s
 all nodes in same collision domain (can collide with each
other)
 today: star topology prevails
 active switch in center
 each “spoke” runs a (separate) Ethernet protocol (nodes
do not collide with each other)
switch
bus: coaxial cable
star
5: DataLink Layer
5-36
802.3 Ethernet Standards: Link & Physical Layers
 many different Ethernet standards
 common MAC protocol and frame format
 different speeds: 2 Mbps, 10 Mbps, 100 Mbps, 1Gbps,
10G bps
 different physical layer media: fiber, cable
 Switched Ethernet: use frame bursting to
increase utilization. Still CSMA/CD compatible
application
transport
network
link
physical
MAC protocol
and frame format
100BASE-TX
100BASE-T2
100BASE-FX
100BASE-T4
100BASE-SX
100BASE-BX
copper (twister
pair) physical layer
fiber physical layer
5: DataLink Layer
5-37
Shared medium hub
5: DataLink Layer
5-38
Switching hub
5: DataLink Layer
5-39
5: DataLink Layer
5-40
5: DataLink Layer
5-41
Switch: allows multiple simultaneous
transmissions
A
 hosts have dedicated,
direct connection to switch
 switches buffer packets
 Ethernet protocol used on
each incoming link, but no
collisions; full duplex

each link is its own collision
domain
 switching: A-to-A’ and B-
to-B’ simultaneously,
without collisions

not possible with dumb hub
C’
B
6
1
5
2
3
4
C
B’
A’
switch with six interfaces
(1,2,3,4,5,6)
5: DataLink Layer
5-42
Self-learning,
forwarding:
example
Source: A
Dest: A’
A A A’
C’
B
 frame destination
unknown: flood
A6A’
1
2
4
5
 destination A
location known:
selective send
C
A’ A
B’
3
A’
MAC addr interface TTL
A
A’
1
4
60
60
Switch table
(initially empty)
5: DataLink Layer
5-43