(pdf)
... Proof. By the definition of divisor, L = i(p − 1) = j(q − 1) + k for nonzero integers i, j, k where 1 ≤ k < q − 1. Using Fermat’s Little Theorem shows that aL = ai(p−1) = (ap−1 )i ≡ 1i ≡ 1 (mod p) and aL = aj(q−1)+k = (aq−1 )j ak ≡ 1j · ak ≡ ak (mod q). From the equations above, we see that p | aL − ...
... Proof. By the definition of divisor, L = i(p − 1) = j(q − 1) + k for nonzero integers i, j, k where 1 ≤ k < q − 1. Using Fermat’s Little Theorem shows that aL = ai(p−1) = (ap−1 )i ≡ 1i ≡ 1 (mod p) and aL = aj(q−1)+k = (aq−1 )j ak ≡ 1j · ak ≡ ak (mod q). From the equations above, we see that p | aL − ...
Project Information - Donald Bren School of Information and
... We extend Andersson-Madigan-Perlman chain graphs by (i) relaxing the semidirected acyclity constraint so that only directed cycles are forbidden, and (ii) allowing up to two edges between any pair of nodes. We introduce global, and ordered local and pairwise Markov properties for the new models. We ...
... We extend Andersson-Madigan-Perlman chain graphs by (i) relaxing the semidirected acyclity constraint so that only directed cycles are forbidden, and (ii) allowing up to two edges between any pair of nodes. We introduce global, and ordered local and pairwise Markov properties for the new models. We ...
Streaming algorithms for embedding and computing edit distance in
... Theorem 1.3. There is a probabilistic algorithm that on input x, y ∈ {0, 1}n and an integer s with probability at least 1 − 1/n outputs k = ∆e (x, y) if k < s1/6 , and a series of k edit operations transforming x into y . With the remaining probability the algorithm outputs `I DO NOT KNOW'. The algo ...
... Theorem 1.3. There is a probabilistic algorithm that on input x, y ∈ {0, 1}n and an integer s with probability at least 1 − 1/n outputs k = ∆e (x, y) if k < s1/6 , and a series of k edit operations transforming x into y . With the remaining probability the algorithm outputs `I DO NOT KNOW'. The algo ...
Undergraduate algebra
... the rectangle have the same number of symmetries, but they are clearly symmetric in different ways. How can one capture this difference? Given two symmetries of some shape, we may transform the shape by the first one, and then apply the second one to the result. The operation obtained in this way is ...
... the rectangle have the same number of symmetries, but they are clearly symmetric in different ways. How can one capture this difference? Given two symmetries of some shape, we may transform the shape by the first one, and then apply the second one to the result. The operation obtained in this way is ...