• Study Resource
  • Explore Categories
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
PHIL 103: Logic and Reasoning QRII Homework #3 Due Monday
PHIL 103: Logic and Reasoning QRII Homework #3 Due Monday

View - Catalyst - University of Washington
View - Catalyst - University of Washington

Lecture 4 - Michael De
Lecture 4 - Michael De

... Assume that instead of interpreting i as a gap, we interpret it as a glut. But then taking the value i means being both true and false, and hence true, and hence designated. So we need to add i to D. The resulting logic is called LP, or the Logic of Paradox, as Priest originally called it. It is the ...
Lesson 2
Lesson 2

Sections 1.7 and 1.8
Sections 1.7 and 1.8

Logics of Truth - Project Euclid
Logics of Truth - Project Euclid

... to Scott [10] and Aczel [1]. The central notion is AczePs concept of a Frege structure. These structures are models of the Lambda Calculus together with two distinguished subsets —a set of propositions and a subset of this set called truths. In addition, such structures come equipped with the usual ...
TERMS on mfcs - WordPress.com
TERMS on mfcs - WordPress.com

Point-free geometry, Approximate Distances and Verisimilitude of
Point-free geometry, Approximate Distances and Verisimilitude of

... things in an Euclidean space are regions. This in accordance with Whitehead’s analysis aiming at emphasizing that objects of such a kind are the result of “abstraction processes”. A proper choice for these requirements is to assume that R is the class of regular bounded closed subsets. Definition 4. ...
Logical Prior Probability - Institute for Creative Technologies
Logical Prior Probability - Institute for Creative Technologies

Lesson 2
Lesson 2

Section 2.4: Arguments with Quantified Statements
Section 2.4: Arguments with Quantified Statements

Lecture 3
Lecture 3

KRIPKE-PLATEK SET THEORY AND THE ANTI
KRIPKE-PLATEK SET THEORY AND THE ANTI

PDF
PDF

Mathematical Logic
Mathematical Logic

... • Become familiar with quantifiers and predicates • Learn various proof techniques • Explore what an algorithm is dww-logic ...
Chapter1_Parts2
Chapter1_Parts2

... ● Assert that no cell contains more than one number. ...
A Partially Truth Functional Approach to
A Partially Truth Functional Approach to

The origin of the technical use of "sound argument": a postscript
The origin of the technical use of "sound argument": a postscript

Palo Alto 2016 - Stanford Introduction to Logic
Palo Alto 2016 - Stanford Introduction to Logic

Document
Document

Lecture 7. Model theory. Consistency, independence, completeness
Lecture 7. Model theory. Consistency, independence, completeness

Chapter 2 Propositional Logic
Chapter 2 Propositional Logic

Introduction to Rhetorical Theory PowerPoint Introduction to
Introduction to Rhetorical Theory PowerPoint Introduction to

... Ex.: All humans beings are mortal. Socrates is a human being. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. ...
Weak Theories and Essential Incompleteness
Weak Theories and Essential Incompleteness

Word file - UC Davis
Word file - UC Davis

< 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... 56 >

Truth-bearer

A truth-bearer is an entity that is said to be either true or false and nothing else. The thesis that some things are true while others are false has led to different theories about the nature of these entities. Since there is divergence of opinion on the matter, the term truth-bearer is used to be neutral among the various theories. Truth-bearer candidates include propositions, sentences, sentence-tokens, statements, concepts, beliefs, thoughts, intuitions, utterances, and judgements but different authors exclude one or more of these, deny their existence, argue that they are true only in a derivative sense, assert or assume that the terms are synonymous,or seek to avoid addressing their distinction or do not clarify it.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report