• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
The Zassenhaus lemma for categories
The Zassenhaus lemma for categories

Full text
Full text

Introduction to Writing Proofs in Mathematics
Introduction to Writing Proofs in Mathematics

diagram algebras, hecke algebras and decomposition numbers at
diagram algebras, hecke algebras and decomposition numbers at

real numbers - Math PDT KMPk
real numbers - Math PDT KMPk

... Topic 1 : Number System ...
Rational points on Shimura curves and Galois representations Carlos de Vera Piquero
Rational points on Shimura curves and Galois representations Carlos de Vera Piquero

... cubic 3x3 +4y 3 = 5. These curves have rational points locally everywhere, but fail to have global Qrational points, thus they are counterexamples to the Hasse principle (see [Lin40, Rei42, Sel51]). Genus one curves violating the Hasse principle, like the previous ones, represent non-trivial element ...
Extreme Points in Isometric Banach Space Theory
Extreme Points in Isometric Banach Space Theory

Chapter 6 Sequences and Series of Real Numbers
Chapter 6 Sequences and Series of Real Numbers

Representation schemes and rigid maximal Cohen
Representation schemes and rigid maximal Cohen

DESCENT OF DELIGNE GROUPOIDS 1. Introduction 1.1. A formal
DESCENT OF DELIGNE GROUPOIDS 1. Introduction 1.1. A formal

NONCOMMUTATIVE JORDAN ALGEBRAS OF
NONCOMMUTATIVE JORDAN ALGEBRAS OF

ML is not finitely axiomatizable over Cheq
ML is not finitely axiomatizable over Cheq

On strong pseudoprimes in arithmetic progressions
On strong pseudoprimes in arithmetic progressions

CMSC 203 / 0202 Fall 2002
CMSC 203 / 0202 Fall 2002

SA-I Class-X Maths-2(Download)
SA-I Class-X Maths-2(Download)

... 2. The question paper consists of 34 questions divided into four sections A, B, C, and D. Section – A comprises of 8 questions of 1 mark each, Section – B comprises of 6 questions of 2 marks each, Section – C comprises of 10 questions of 3 marks each and Section – D comprises of 10 questions of 4 ma ...
Ideals
Ideals

Coinductive Definitions and Real Numbers
Coinductive Definitions and Real Numbers

On different notions of tameness in arithmetic geometry
On different notions of tameness in arithmetic geometry

... We start by recalling the following desingularization results. See [Lip] for a proof of (i) and [Sha], Lecture 3, Theorem on p. 38 and Remark 2 on p. 43, for (ii). We denote the set of regular points of a scheme X by X reg . Proposition 2.1. Let X be a two-dimensional, normal, connected and excellen ...
5.7 Introduction to Square Roots
5.7 Introduction to Square Roots

CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM FOR THE EXCITED RANDOM WALK
CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM FOR THE EXCITED RANDOM WALK

... Our proof is based on the well-known construction of regeneration times for the random walk, the key issue being to obtain good tail estimates for these regeneration times. Indeed, using estimates for the so-called tan points of the simple random walk, introduced in [1] and subsequently used in [6, ...
Chapter 6
Chapter 6

... Note for d): Terms must be rearranged to factor a GCF from a binomial. There are several different possibilities, so don't let it worry you if you would have chosen a different arrangement. [xy  x + 2y  2 is one and xy + 2y  x  2 is the other] Note 2 for d): In addition to rearranging the group ...
Classical Period Domains - Stony Brook Mathematics
Classical Period Domains - Stony Brook Mathematics

Fractional Exponent Functors and Categories of Differential Equations
Fractional Exponent Functors and Categories of Differential Equations

quotient rings of a ring and a subring which have a common right ideal
quotient rings of a ring and a subring which have a common right ideal

TOPOLOGICALLY UNREALIZABLE AUTOMORPHISMS OF FREE
TOPOLOGICALLY UNREALIZABLE AUTOMORPHISMS OF FREE

< 1 ... 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... 480 >

Fundamental theorem of algebra

The fundamental theorem of algebra states that every non-constant single-variable polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one complex root. This includes polynomials with real coefficients, since every real number is a complex number with an imaginary part equal to zero.Equivalently (by definition), the theorem states that the field of complex numbers is algebraically closed.The theorem is also stated as follows: every non-zero, single-variable, degree n polynomial with complex coefficients has, counted with multiplicity, exactly n roots. The equivalence of the two statements can be proven through the use of successive polynomial division.In spite of its name, there is no purely algebraic proof of the theorem, since any proof must use the completeness of the reals (or some other equivalent formulation of completeness), which is not an algebraic concept. Additionally, it is not fundamental for modern algebra; its name was given at a time when the study of algebra was mainly concerned with the solutions of polynomial equations with real or complex coefficients.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report