• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
GCD of Many Integers
GCD of Many Integers

Self-study Textbook_Algebra_ch9
Self-study Textbook_Algebra_ch9

Lesson 8-5
Lesson 8-5

... equation. A quadratic equation is an equation that can be written in the standard form ax2 + bx + c = 0, where a, b, and c are real numbers and a ≠ 0. When writing a quadratic function as its related quadratic equation, you replace y with 0. So y = 0. y = ax2 + bx + c 0 = ax2 + bx + c ax2 + bx + c = ...
Standard Monomial Theory and applications
Standard Monomial Theory and applications

A Cut-Invariant Law of Large Numbers for Random Heaps
A Cut-Invariant Law of Large Numbers for Random Heaps

Complex Numbers and Ordinary Differential Equations
Complex Numbers and Ordinary Differential Equations

Phil 312: Intermediate Logic, Precept 7.
Phil 312: Intermediate Logic, Precept 7.

CENTRAL SEQUENCE ALGEBRAS OF VON NEUMANN
CENTRAL SEQUENCE ALGEBRAS OF VON NEUMANN

SUM OF TWO SQUARES Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries
SUM OF TWO SQUARES Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries

Brauer-Thrall for totally reflexive modules
Brauer-Thrall for totally reflexive modules

... (1.2) Theorem. If there exists a totally reflexive R-module without free summands, which is presented by a matrix that has a column or a row with only one non-zero entry, then that entry is an exact zero divisor in R. These two results—the latter of which is distilled from Theorem (5.3)—show that ex ...
Solutions - the National Internet Math Olympiad!
Solutions - the National Internet Math Olympiad!

Cohomology of Categorical Self-Distributivity
Cohomology of Categorical Self-Distributivity

... A quandle, X, is a set with a binary operation (a, b) 7→ a / b such that (I) For any a ∈ X, a / a = a. (II) For any a, b ∈ X, there is a unique c ∈ X such that a = c / b. (III) For any a, b, c ∈ X, we have (a / b) / c = (a / c) / (b / c). A rack is a set with a binary operation that satisfies (II) a ...
Square and Cube Roots - Mathwithoutcalculators.com
Square and Cube Roots - Mathwithoutcalculators.com

Division closed partially ordered rings
Division closed partially ordered rings

TWO-VARIABLE FIRST-ORDER LOGIC WITH EQUIVALENCE
TWO-VARIABLE FIRST-ORDER LOGIC WITH EQUIVALENCE

Solutions Sheet 7
Solutions Sheet 7

... Solution: (a) If X were affine, it would be isomorphic to Spec OX (X). We claim that this is not the case. Similarly to the example of P1k in the lecture, we compute the ring of global sections OX (X) = OX (U1 ) ∩ OX (U2 ), where the intersection is as subrings of OX (U12 ) = k[X1 , X1−1 ]. This yie ...
On Cantor`s First Uncountability Proof, Pick`s Theorem
On Cantor`s First Uncountability Proof, Pick`s Theorem

Bridging Course in Mathematics
Bridging Course in Mathematics

Computability on the Real Numbers
Computability on the Real Numbers

PRIMITIVE PYTHAGOREAN TRIPLES WITH SUM OR DIFFERENCE
PRIMITIVE PYTHAGOREAN TRIPLES WITH SUM OR DIFFERENCE

13 Lecture 13: Uniformity and sheaf properties
13 Lecture 13: Uniformity and sheaf properties

∗-AUTONOMOUS CATEGORIES: ONCE MORE
∗-AUTONOMOUS CATEGORIES: ONCE MORE

A NEW EXAMPLE OF NON-AMORPHOUS ASSOCIATION
A NEW EXAMPLE OF NON-AMORPHOUS ASSOCIATION

... [3] (see also [5]). Ito, Munemasa and Yamada constructed amorphous association schemes over Galois rings. Clearly, in an amorphous association scheme, every nontrivial relation is a strongly regular graph. A. V. Ivanov [8] conjectured the converse also holds, but later it was disproved by van Dam [1 ...
Rational Numbers – Fractions, Decimals and Calculators
Rational Numbers – Fractions, Decimals and Calculators

... has been converted into 0.75, its decimal form. If the remainder was anything other than zero, we could continue the process followed in steps (3), (4), and (5). Each cycle through these steps adds one more digit to the decimal answer. If the decimal does not terminate, then – eventually – you would ...
Long division for integers
Long division for integers

< 1 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 ... 480 >

Fundamental theorem of algebra

The fundamental theorem of algebra states that every non-constant single-variable polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one complex root. This includes polynomials with real coefficients, since every real number is a complex number with an imaginary part equal to zero.Equivalently (by definition), the theorem states that the field of complex numbers is algebraically closed.The theorem is also stated as follows: every non-zero, single-variable, degree n polynomial with complex coefficients has, counted with multiplicity, exactly n roots. The equivalence of the two statements can be proven through the use of successive polynomial division.In spite of its name, there is no purely algebraic proof of the theorem, since any proof must use the completeness of the reals (or some other equivalent formulation of completeness), which is not an algebraic concept. Additionally, it is not fundamental for modern algebra; its name was given at a time when the study of algebra was mainly concerned with the solutions of polynomial equations with real or complex coefficients.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report