• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Manifolds with Boundary
Manifolds with Boundary

Introduction to Number Theory
Introduction to Number Theory

Math 594. Solutions 3 Book problems §5.1: 14. Let G = A1 × A2
Math 594. Solutions 3 Book problems §5.1: 14. Let G = A1 × A2

... (since g0 has order n and χ0 gives an isomorphism of hg0 i with µn (C)), so that χ(G) = µn (C). Now we claim that H ∩ K = 1. Indeed, if h ∈ H ∩ K, then χ(h) = 1 since h ∈ K, but χ induces an isomorphism χ0 : H → µn (C), so χ(h) = χ0 (h) = 1 forces h = 1 since, in particular, χ0 is injective. We conc ...
Ulrich bundles on abelian surfaces
Ulrich bundles on abelian surfaces

PPT
PPT

Small Deformations of Topological Algebras Mati Abel and Krzysztof Jarosz
Small Deformations of Topological Algebras Mati Abel and Krzysztof Jarosz

... on Ω and continuous on Ω, is exactly equivalent to the theory of quasiconformal deformations [28]. On the other hand, almost nothing is known about small deformations of algebras of analytic functions of many variables [15]. The problem is of particular importance since an answer may provide a multi ...
Physiological Significance of Lysigenous Lacunae in the Rice Plant
Physiological Significance of Lysigenous Lacunae in the Rice Plant

... Several lines of investigation have been carried out on the formation of lysigenous lacunae of rice plant roots. The results obtained so far, however, do not agree with each other on the mechanism of formation and physiological significance of the lacunae. It was reported by many investigators•>. 61 ...
LINEAR INDEPENDENCE OF LOGARITHMS OF - IMJ-PRG
LINEAR INDEPENDENCE OF LOGARITHMS OF - IMJ-PRG

20(2)
20(2)

THE CLASSICAL GROUPS
THE CLASSICAL GROUPS

Abstract algebraic logic and the deduction theorem
Abstract algebraic logic and the deduction theorem

x + 1 - mrhubbard
x + 1 - mrhubbard

... a = 2 , c = -10, and b = -1 Since a times c is negative, and b is negative we need to find two factors with opposite signs whose product is -20 and that add up to -1. Since the sum is negative, larger factor of -20 must be negative. Factors of -20 ...
Quaternion algebras and quadratic forms
Quaternion algebras and quadratic forms

INFINITUDE OF ELLIPTIC CARMICHAEL NUMBERS
INFINITUDE OF ELLIPTIC CARMICHAEL NUMBERS

hnd u Nonce u,v
hnd u Nonce u,v

LIE GROUPS AND LIE ALGEBRAS – A FIRST VIEW 1. Motivation
LIE GROUPS AND LIE ALGEBRAS – A FIRST VIEW 1. Motivation

Trees and amenable equivalence relations
Trees and amenable equivalence relations

solution
solution

22 January 2013 The Queen of Mathematics Professor Raymond
22 January 2013 The Queen of Mathematics Professor Raymond

homework 11
homework 11

Michał Jan Cukrowski, Zbigniew Pasternak
Michał Jan Cukrowski, Zbigniew Pasternak

... be defined on the generators by the formula χ0 (πi |M ) = 0 for all i ∈ I. So there would be only one point 0 ∈ M̃ − M . But it cannot be so since from Corollary 4 we know that all the functions from CM are prolongable to the point 0. From the last lemma we know that there exists a function ξ ∈ CM w ...
Semi-crossed Products of C*-Algebras
Semi-crossed Products of C*-Algebras

... each continuous and proper mapping 4: S + S defines an endomorphism a of C,(S) by a(f) =fo 4, fE C,(S). It is natural to wonder how the ringtheoretic properties of the semi-crossed product 77’ X, C,(S) reflect properties of the mapping 4, and conversely. For example, what are necessary and sufficien ...
IDEAL CLASSES AND SL 1. Introduction (C) on the Riemann
IDEAL CLASSES AND SL 1. Introduction (C) on the Riemann

On the Asymptotic Behaviour of General Partition Functions
On the Asymptotic Behaviour of General Partition Functions

Lecture Notes on C -algebras
Lecture Notes on C -algebras

< 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 480 >

Fundamental theorem of algebra

The fundamental theorem of algebra states that every non-constant single-variable polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one complex root. This includes polynomials with real coefficients, since every real number is a complex number with an imaginary part equal to zero.Equivalently (by definition), the theorem states that the field of complex numbers is algebraically closed.The theorem is also stated as follows: every non-zero, single-variable, degree n polynomial with complex coefficients has, counted with multiplicity, exactly n roots. The equivalence of the two statements can be proven through the use of successive polynomial division.In spite of its name, there is no purely algebraic proof of the theorem, since any proof must use the completeness of the reals (or some other equivalent formulation of completeness), which is not an algebraic concept. Additionally, it is not fundamental for modern algebra; its name was given at a time when the study of algebra was mainly concerned with the solutions of polynomial equations with real or complex coefficients.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report