• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Unit 1: Lesson 1 (Gold 1
Unit 1: Lesson 1 (Gold 1

Model Theory as Peacock`s Revenge
Model Theory as Peacock`s Revenge

PreCalculus Review Packet
PreCalculus Review Packet

... Types: ...
THE CHAIN LEMMA FOR KUMMER ELEMENTS OF DEGREE 3
THE CHAIN LEMMA FOR KUMMER ELEMENTS OF DEGREE 3

... (iii) For Y as in (ii) one has E(X, ζ) = Y L = LY . Proof. (i) follows from dimk L = deg A, (ii) from the Skolem-Noether theorem, and (iii) from (i) and (ii). By a ζ-pair we understand a pair (X, Y ) of invertible elements X, Y ∈ A such that Y X = ζXY . Lemma 1.2. Let (X, Y ) be a ζ-pair. (i) X and ...
Lecture 10
Lecture 10

WORKING WITH INTEGERS: 1. Adding Rules: Positive + Positive
WORKING WITH INTEGERS: 1. Adding Rules: Positive + Positive

Leftist Numbers
Leftist Numbers

Separation of Variables and the Computation of Fourier
Separation of Variables and the Computation of Fourier

... Definition 2.7 A Bratteli diagram is a finite graded quiver such that: (i) there is a unique vertex with grading 0, called the root, (ii) if v ∈ V (Q) is not the root then v is the target of at least one arrow, (iii) if v ∈ V (Q) does not have grading of maximum value then v is the source of at leas ...
Real Numbers - UCLA Department of Mathematics
Real Numbers - UCLA Department of Mathematics

Sheet 8 - TUM M7/Analysis
Sheet 8 - TUM M7/Analysis

Lecture notes, sections 2.1 to 2.3
Lecture notes, sections 2.1 to 2.3

0.1 Fractions Mod p and Wolstenholme`s theorem
0.1 Fractions Mod p and Wolstenholme`s theorem

Reflexive property - A number is equal to itself. If x is a real number
Reflexive property - A number is equal to itself. If x is a real number

Math 327 Elementary Matrices and Inverse Matrices Definition: An n
Math 327 Elementary Matrices and Inverse Matrices Definition: An n

Simple Lie algebras having extremal elements
Simple Lie algebras having extremal elements

... ofcharacteristic p > 3. Let L, = L; (-adh) (i = - 2, -1,0, 1,2) be the components of the Zp-grading by h = [x, y]. Then either p = 5 and [y, [y, v]] = x for some vEL_I, or y is extremal in L, the components L, (i = -2, -1,0,1,2) actually give a Z-grading of L, with L-2 = IFx, L2 = IFy, [x, L-d = L1, ...
02-proof
02-proof

CSci 2011 Discrete Mathematics
CSci 2011 Discrete Mathematics

Hoofdstuk 1
Hoofdstuk 1

By Cameron Hilker Grade 11 Toolkit Exponents, Radicals, Quadratic
By Cameron Hilker Grade 11 Toolkit Exponents, Radicals, Quadratic

... Finding the roots of a Quadratic by Factoring x2 Another way to solve is by factoring when the equation is in the form ax2+bx+c= 0. You must have it equal to zero that means x will have two answers. Example: Solve by Factoring x2+9x+18 (x+3)(x+6) x+3=0 x+6=0 x=-3 x=-6 x=-3 and-6 When 1 doesn’t equal ...
1 Homework 1
1 Homework 1

The Group Structure of Elliptic Curves Defined over Finite Fields
The Group Structure of Elliptic Curves Defined over Finite Fields

... as curves and because we get new solutions by intersecting various lines with our curve. Number theory is present in the fact that we are looking for integer and rational solutions. Algebra, however, has a more subtle role and provides us with a fundamentally important tool in studying elliptic curv ...
LECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS 2. Algebras of Crawley-Boevey and Holland
LECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS 2. Algebras of Crawley-Boevey and Holland

P 5. #1.1 Proof. n N - Department of Mathematics
P 5. #1.1 Proof. n N - Department of Mathematics

ENDOMORPHISMS OF ELLIPTIC CURVES 0.1. Endomorphisms
ENDOMORPHISMS OF ELLIPTIC CURVES 0.1. Endomorphisms

A RIGOROUS TIME BOUND FOR FACTORING INTEGERS For real
A RIGOROUS TIME BOUND FOR FACTORING INTEGERS For real

< 1 ... 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 ... 480 >

Fundamental theorem of algebra

The fundamental theorem of algebra states that every non-constant single-variable polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one complex root. This includes polynomials with real coefficients, since every real number is a complex number with an imaginary part equal to zero.Equivalently (by definition), the theorem states that the field of complex numbers is algebraically closed.The theorem is also stated as follows: every non-zero, single-variable, degree n polynomial with complex coefficients has, counted with multiplicity, exactly n roots. The equivalence of the two statements can be proven through the use of successive polynomial division.In spite of its name, there is no purely algebraic proof of the theorem, since any proof must use the completeness of the reals (or some other equivalent formulation of completeness), which is not an algebraic concept. Additionally, it is not fundamental for modern algebra; its name was given at a time when the study of algebra was mainly concerned with the solutions of polynomial equations with real or complex coefficients.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report