Intuitionistic and Modal Logic
... • Theorem For finite Γ, Γ ` IPC ϕ iff ϕ is valid in all finite Kripke models of Γ for IPC. • Proof. The proof can be done by filtration. We will not do that here. Or by reducing the whole discussion to the set of subformulas of Γ ∪ {ϕ} (a so-called adequate set, both in the definition of the (reduce ...
... • Theorem For finite Γ, Γ ` IPC ϕ iff ϕ is valid in all finite Kripke models of Γ for IPC. • Proof. The proof can be done by filtration. We will not do that here. Or by reducing the whole discussion to the set of subformulas of Γ ∪ {ϕ} (a so-called adequate set, both in the definition of the (reduce ...
Lecture 1: Elements of Mathematical Logic
... 1.1. Statements. In order to get our bearings, let us begin with a discussion of logic and proof. Much of this discussion will appear as common sense. However, not all common sense is logical, nor does every common sensical argument constitute a proof. For this reason, we must delineate from the sta ...
... 1.1. Statements. In order to get our bearings, let us begin with a discussion of logic and proof. Much of this discussion will appear as common sense. However, not all common sense is logical, nor does every common sensical argument constitute a proof. For this reason, we must delineate from the sta ...
(pdf)
... Our goal in this section, as described earlier, is to show that OK is a Dedekind domain. In order to do this, we first return to module theory. Definition 2.3. Let R be a ring, and let M be an R-module. M is a free Rmodule on the subset C of M if for all x ∈ M , such that x 6= 0, there exist unique ...
... Our goal in this section, as described earlier, is to show that OK is a Dedekind domain. In order to do this, we first return to module theory. Definition 2.3. Let R be a ring, and let M be an R-module. M is a free Rmodule on the subset C of M if for all x ∈ M , such that x 6= 0, there exist unique ...
A continuous partial order for Peano continua
... Then g"*(jF) is the set of sets in ^"{1) which have order ί + 1 and have a nonempty intersection with F. The sets ξ?(F) and ξ?*(F) may be empty. For Ee C£(F) U &*(F) let dE(F) = E Γ\ F. If ξ?*(F) is not empty, let p(F) be d{d*F,d*F), Thus p(F) is the infimum of the distances between the points of F ...
... Then g"*(jF) is the set of sets in ^"{1) which have order ί + 1 and have a nonempty intersection with F. The sets ξ?(F) and ξ?*(F) may be empty. For Ee C£(F) U &*(F) let dE(F) = E Γ\ F. If ξ?*(F) is not empty, let p(F) be d{d*F,d*F), Thus p(F) is the infimum of the distances between the points of F ...
Document
... if it has area n and its sides lie on the grid lines. The sum of the numbers written in the squares contained in an admissible polygon is called the value of the polygon. Prove that if the values of any two congruent admissible polygons are equal, then all of the numbers written in the squares of th ...
... if it has area n and its sides lie on the grid lines. The sum of the numbers written in the squares contained in an admissible polygon is called the value of the polygon. Prove that if the values of any two congruent admissible polygons are equal, then all of the numbers written in the squares of th ...
