* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download hw1.pdf
Sheaf (mathematics) wikipedia , lookup
Geometrization conjecture wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental group wikipedia , lookup
Brouwer fixed-point theorem wikipedia , lookup
Covering space wikipedia , lookup
Surface (topology) wikipedia , lookup
Felix Hausdorff wikipedia , lookup
Grothendieck topology wikipedia , lookup
Algebra III Home Assignment 1 Subhadip Chowdhury Problem 1 Consider the sequence of homomorphisms n fn : Z[[x]] → Z/p Z, fn X ai x i = X ai p i mod pn i<n Clearly these maps are compatible with the canonical transition homomorphisms ϕn : Z/pn+1 Z → Z/pn Z hence defining the projective limit, we get that there is a unique homomorphism f : Z[[x]] → lim Z/pn Z = Zp ←− compatible with the fn ’s. Now take any y ∈ Zp . Suppose the map Zp → lim Z/pn Z associates with y the sequence (yi )i∈N ∈ Z/pi Z. ←− Let a0 = y1 ∈ Z. Next note that y2 ∈ Z/p2 Z and ϕ2 (y2 ) = y1 . So ∃a1 ∈ Z such that y2 = y1 + a1 p. Similarly ϕn (yn ) = yn−1 implies ∃ai ∈ Z such that yn = yn−1 + an−1 pn−1 . Continuing similarly, we find thatP∃ai ∀i ∈ N such that yn+1 = y1 + a1 p + a2 p2 P + . . . + an pn . Consider the of Z[[x]] defined P∞element ∞ ∞ i i i by i=0 ai x . Then clearly by construction, fn ( i=0 ai x ) = yn . So f ( i=0 ai x ) = y. Hence f is surjective. Next we want to prove that ker(f P ) is the principal P ideal generated by x − p. So we have to show that if we have a formal power series ai xi such that i<n ai pi mod pn = 0 for all n ∈ N, then x − p divides the formal power series. For n = 1, we have a0 ≡ 0( mod p). Hence a0 = pα0 for some α0 ∈ Z. Then for n = 2, we have a0 + a1 p ≡ 0( mod p2 ) ⇒ α0 + a1 ≡ 0( mod p). Hence there is some integer α1 such that α0 + a1 = pα1 . Continuing in similar way, we get that for any n ≥ 1, we have pn αn−1 + an pn = a0 + a1 p + . . . + an pn ≡ 0( mod pn+1 ) so that there is an integer αn with αn−1 + an = pαn . We can summarize these relations by a0 = pα0 , an = pαn − αn−1 ∀n ≥ 1 Hence X a0 + a1 x + a2 x2 + . . . = (p − x)(α0 + α1 x + α2 x2 + . . .) ⇒ (x − p) ai xi 1 (?) Algebra Conversely if isomorphism Subhadip Chowdhury P ai xi ∈ (x − p), then (?) holds. Thus P i<n Assignment 1 ai pi ≡ 0 mod pn . Thus we have a ring ∼ = g : Z[[x]]/(x − p) → Zp By construction g is clearly a continuous bijection. Now Z[[x]]/(x − p) = lim Z[xn ]/(pn , x − p), hence ←− it is compact and Zp is Hausdorff since the p-adic valuation makes it a metric space. Thus g is a continuous bijection from a compact set to a Hausdorff space, hence it is a homeomorphism. Hence g is an isomorphism of topological rings. Problem 2 Denote α by α1 . Thus we have a simple root α1 of P in Fp i.e. PP (α1 ) ≡ 0 P mod p. We want to show i that ∃α ∈ Zp such that P (α) = 0 in Zp and f1 (α) = α1 where fn ( ai p ) = i<n ai pi is the canonical projection map from Zp to Z/pn Z. For n ≥ 1, suppose we have an element αn ∈ Z/pn Z such that P (αn ) ≡ 0 mod pn and P 0 (αn ) 6≡ 0 mod p. We look for an element αn+1 = αn + tpn ∈ Z/pn+1 Z such that P (αn+1 ) ≡ 0 mod pn+1 . Note that by expanding out the polynomial P we can write P (αn + tpn ) = P (αn ) + tpn P 0 (αn ) + O(p2n ) Reducing both sides modulo pn+1 , we see that for P (αn+1 ) ≡ 0 mod pn+1 to hold, we need 0 ≡ P (αn + tpn ) = P (αn ) + tpn P 0 (αn ) mod (pn+1 ) since 2n ≥ n + 1. Now P (αn ) = zpn for some integer z. So, 0 ≡ (z + tP 0 (αn ))pn mod pn+1 ⇒ 0 ≡ z + tP 0 (αn ) mod p So putting t=− z P 0 (α n) =− P (αn ) n p P 0 (αn ) we get an explicit formula: αn+1 = αn − P (αn ) P 0 (αn ) Since P 0 (αn ) is nonzero modulo p and hence pn , it has a unique inverse. Hence αn+1 is unique by construction. Also note that by the first order Taylor expansion of P 0 at αn , we have P 0 (αn+1 ) = P 0 (αn + (αn+1 − αn )) = P 0 (αn ) + (αn+1 − αn ).(terms involving second and higher derivatives of P) = P 0 (αn ) + (αn+1 − αn ).s (,let) = u + tspn where u is a unit in Z/pZ. Thus clearly P 0 (αn+1 ) 6≡ 0 mod p. 2 Algebra Subhadip Chowdhury Assignment 1 Thus by Induction principle, for all n ∈ N, we have constructed a series of element αn ∈ Z/pn Z such that ϕn (αn ) = αn−1 where ϕn : Z/pn Z → Z/pn−1 Z is the canonical projection homomorphism and P (αn ) ≡ 0 mod pn . Then taking projective limit we can find an element α ∈ Zp such that fn (α) = αn for all n ∈ N and P (α) = 0 in Zp . Thus we have proved that P a zero α ∈ Zp of which, image in Fp is α1 = α. Problem 3 3.1 By the definition of topology on Af in , if Q pZp is open in Af in , then its intersection with n−1 Ẑ p∈P −1 must be open in n Ẑ for all n ∈ N. In particular for n = 1, we must have Y \ pZp Ẑ is open in Ẑ p∈P Now Y pZp \ Ẑ = p∈P But the open subsets of Q Y pZp \Y p∈P p∈P Zp = Y pZp p∈P Zp of the form p∈P Y Ωp × Y Zp p6∈S p∈S Q Q Zp . Then any open subset of Zp has where S ⊆ P is a finite set; forms a basis of open subsets of p∈P p∈P Q pZp cannot be an open subset of Ẑ since pZp 6= Zp infinitely many coordinates equal to Zp . Hence p∈P Q and consequently, pZp is not an open subset of Af in . p∈P Next we claim that Af in is a topological ring. Clearly addition is a continuous function from Af in × Af in → Af in . To show that the multiplication operation Af in × Af in → Af in is continuous it is enough to prove that multiplication by an element of Af in from n−1 Ẑ to m−1 Ẑ is a continuous map, which is true. Thus, in particular, multiplication by (p)p∈P ∈ Af in is a continuous function. Note that Q Zp is compact by Tychonoff’s theorem and hence, the fact that Ẑ continuously injects into Q Af in implies it is a compact subset of Af in . Then the continuous image of Zp under the multiplication p∈P Q by the element (p)p∈P is also a compact set. Thus pZp is a compact subset of Af in . p∈P p∈P Another way of seeing this is to note that we can prove that the topology Q on Af in is equivalent to the product topology. Then by Tychonoff theorem, we can directly say that pZp is a compact subset of p∈P Af in . 3 Algebra Subhadip Chowdhury Assignment 1 Note that Ẑ is product of Hausdorff spaces, and hence Hausdorff. Thus n1 Ẑ is Hausdorff for each n. But given any two points Q in Af in , we can find N ∈ N such that they are elements of N −1 Ẑ. Thus Af in is a Hausdorff space. Then pZp is a compact subset of a Hausdorff space and hence a closed subset p∈P of Af in . Q Another way of seeing this is to note that the complement of pZp in Ẑ is p∈P [ p∈P which is open and hence Q 1 z ∈ Zp : |z|p > p ! × Y Zq p6=q∈P pZp is a closed subset of Ẑ. But Ẑ is a closed subset of Af in . Hence p∈P Q pZp p∈P is a closed subset of Af in . 3.2 S Note that Ẑ is an open subset of Af in . It is also closed since its complement n−1 Ẑ is open. n∈N n>1 Now the given set Af in ∩ −1 Q Q p Zp is the inverse image of Zp under the multiplication map by p∈P Q −1 ∈ Af in , which is continuous. Hence Af in ∩ p Zp is an open and closed subset of Af in p∈P (p)p∈P p∈P Suppose Af in ∩ Q p−1 Zp is compact subset of Af in . Note that n−1 Ẑ is open in Af in for each n ∈ N, p∈P by definition of the topology on Af in . Now clearly, the collection of these open sets [ n−1 Ẑ n∈N n−1 Ẑ. Then by compactness, there is a finite Q −1 subcollection from above collection of open sets which covers Af in ∩ p Zp . Suppose forms an open cover of Af in ∩ p−1 Zp ; since Af in = Q p∈P S n∈N p∈P Af in ∩ Y −1 p Zp ⊆ k [ n−1 i Ẑ i=1 p∈P But clearly above result cannot be true. Since for any p >> max{n1 , . . . , nk } we have (1, 1, 1, . . . , 1, Y 1 1 p−1 Zp but (1, 1, 1, . . . , 1, , 1, . . .) ∈ Af in ∩ , 1, . . .) 6∈ n−1 i Ẑ p p p∈P |{z} |{z} pth term Contradiction!! Hence Af in ∩ pth term Q p−1 Zp is not a compact subset of Af in . p∈P 4