Download 1. dia

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY
BUDAPEST
Department of Pedododntics
and Orthodontics
FILLING MATERIALS
in Pedodontics
Dr. Rózsa Noémi
Dr. Déri Katalin
Materials
• Filling materials:
– short term temporary
– long term temporary
– definitive
– underfilling materials
• Endodontic materials
• Prophylactic, preventive materials:
– fissure sealer
– varnish, gel
• Impression materials
• Luting materials:
– cements
– orthodontic bonding
Temporary FM
• Characteristics:
• non toxic
• good retention
• good marginal adaptation
• easy to apply and to take out
• aesthetic
• not expensive Short-term – setting under wet conditions
Long-term – Zink-oxyd-eugenol cement (ZOE)
Endodontic – GIC, ZOE
Inlay:
•temporary light curing composite
•gutta-percha
Underfilling materials
• Effects:
• Temperature stability, isolation
• Protection:
- Elektric stimulation
- Mechanical and chemical effects
• Therapeutical action:
- antiinflammatory
- dentinbridge
• Dentine tube obliteration
• Antibacterial
Thickness:
• Varnish – 1-50µm (dentin-sealer)
• Liner – 0.2 – 1mm: Ca(OH)2, GIC
• Base – 1-2mm: cements
Underfilling materials
• Cink oxy-phosphate cement
•
•
•
•
•
•
liner – fast setting,
luting – long setting,
No obliteration of the dentintubes
pulp – phosphoric acid
in vitro: citotoxic, mutagen
setting: acid-basic reaction
• cinc-oxyd-eugenol cement (ZOE)
• good marginal sealing
• eugenol – low %: bacteriostatic and pain releasing
• long-term TF
• base - deep cavity
- under composit filling
Underfilling materials
• Polycarboxylate cement
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Phosphoric acid → polyacrylic acid
Setting: acid-base reaction
Tooth structures: chemical binding
in vivo: ↓ toxicity
in vitro: ↑ ~ - Zn, F-, mutagenic
↓ mechanical properties, ↑ solubility
difficult „handling”
• Calcium-phosphate cement
• good biocompatibility
• Setting: acid-base reaction
• pulp capping
• under development
Underfilling materials
• Calcium-hydroxide - Ca(OH)2
•
•
•
•
antiseptic
facilitates dentin formation
Ca(OH)2 release /absorption– results week structure
self-curing: - ↑ solubility
- ↓ mechanical properties – an other
application, GIC
• underfilling, direct and indirect pulp capping
• light-curing: - ↓ solubility
- ↑ mechanical properties
- 0,5 – 1mm: pulplesion, under amalgam
- ↓ toxicity
• Direct pulp capping –in primary
dentition may cause chronic pulpitis
MINERAL TRIOXIDE AGGREGATE
MTA
Torabinejad et al. - 1995
1993 – lateral root perforation
retrograde root filling,
direct pulp capping,
bifurcation perforation,
• tricalcium-silicate
apexification.
• dicalcium-silicate
MTA
pH = 12,5 ~ Ca(OH)2
• tricalcium-aluminate
• calciumsulfat-dihidrate
• bismutoxid
• tetracalcium-aluminoferrit
Glassionomer cement GIC
• reactive glassparticules (composite: inert glass)
•
•
•
•
setting: acid-basic reaction
„sandwich” technique
ion: F-, Al3+, Sr2+
structure: - calcium-aluminium-fluor-silicate glass
- strocium-aluminium-fluor-silicate glass
- Polyakrilic acid/polycarbonate acid
glass-polyalchenoate cement
• liner: dentin > 1 mm
• fissure sealing
• prosthetic preparation
• temporary filling
• definitive filling - primary molars
Glassionomer Cement - GIC
Type
Advantage
Disadvantage
Indication
Traditional
self curing
F- release
No Adhesive technique
aesthetics
Powder/liquid proportions
Mechanical properties
Primary molars
Colour (pink)
Long-term water absorption
FS
Cervical erosions
TF
insensitive to moisture
aesthetics
1% ~ polym. shrinkage
allergy
Pulpal lesions
underfilling
prosthetic
Small occlusal
cavity
F- release
Water absorption, water
release
Exact dosage
mechanical properties
aesthetics
Primary molars
TF, underfilling
prosthetics
traditional GIC
aesthetics, ↓F-
Primary molars
Dual setting
Resin reinforced
GIC
Hard, fast setting
CERMET
(Metal reinforced GIC)
Fissure sealing
GIC
CERMET CEMENT
INDICATION
GC Fuji VII or Triage
• Molars short after
eruption or partially
erupted - FS;
• Allergic reactions;
• „Barbie” filling in
primary dentition.
Pink colour
Dual setting
glassionomer cement:
Chemical setting: 2’30”
Light-curing: 2O”
GC Fuji Triage
GC Fuji Triage or VII
• Additional indications
Sensitivity
Intermediate
endodontic
sealing
Intermediate
restoration
Root
surface
protection
GC Fuji II LC
Amalgam
•
Quantity:
•
Cu contents:
•
•
•
low: 2-5% - conventional ~
high: 12-30% - non-gamma-2 ~
Form: < 20-25 µm
–
–
–
–
lathe-cut plate
spherical
Irregular form
mixed
Amalgam
Conventional amalgam
Ag3Sn
γphase
+ Hg →
Ag2Hg3 + Sn8Hg + ≈Ag3Sn
γ1phase
γ2phase
γ-phase
High Copper amalgam
Ag3Sn + Cu3Sn + Hg → Ag2Hg3 +
γphase
γ1phase
Cu6Sn5
η’-phase
+
≈Ag3Sn
γ-phase
• corrosion
• mercuroscopic expansion
• Hg
Primary Dentition - Amalgam
Amalgam
• amalgam – dental unit water
pipe
• pregnancy
• children
• biological dentistry
(natural dentistry)
Composite filling materials
= min. two, chemically different material and one phase
3D combination
LUTZ et al.
Filler type
Conventional composite
CC
macrofiller
Hibrid composite HC
minifiller,
midifiller,
nanofiller
Particule
10 – 100µm
Properties
•↓polym. shrinkage
• good physical ~
• difficult polishing
0,1 – 1 µm
• ↑ polym. shrinkage
1 – 10 µm
• good physical and
0,005 – 0,01 µm optical ~
Homogenic microfilled
composite HMC
microfiller
0,01 – 0,1 µm
Nonhomogenic
microfilled, heterogenic
composite IMC
microfillercomplex
microfiller
+
100 – 200 µm
• resist. abrasion
• good polishing
•↑ polym. shrinkage
• good marginal
sealing
• aesthetics
• fracture
Composit Filling Materials
Special composites
Filler type
Ormocers
Organically modified
ceramic
„cross linked”
polysiloxan in the
organic matrix
Insert - Glass for
Molars
megafiller
0,5 -2,0 mm
Modified
heterogen/homogen
composites
modified filler:
fibre, crystal
• better physical ~
Flowable composites
Flow
HK - ↓ filler%
• fissure sealant
• base for composites
Condensing compozites
↑ filler%
> 80%
Properties
•↓polym. shrinkage
• good resistance to abrasion
• difficult to polish
• occlusal contact
• difficult to apply
• special polym. technique
• molars
• ↓ aesthetic ~
• ↑ viscosity ≈ HK
Compomer
•
•
Special composite,
Composition:
- bifunctional monomer - composite
- Reactive glass filler – GIC
Setting:
- free radical polymerisation
- acid-basic reaction (water absorption from the
environment, 3% max. water content, during
several month):→ chemical setting: material and
tooth
→ FLight curing → filling material
Self curing → luting cement
Twinky Star
Light curing coloured compomer
Primary dentition
Alternative ~ amalgam
Radiopaque
FCompliance
Twinky Star
Oba AA, Sönmez IS, Sari Ş.
Clinical Evaluation of a Colored Compomer
In Primary Molars
Med Princ Pract 2009; 18:31-34
36 patients → 80 II. class fillings, primary
dentitions
M/F = 1; 12 month
Minimally invasive technique
2 mm thickness, 40”
Results:
-
3,9% (3 fillings) – replacement
1,3% caries
1,29% (1 filling) - fracture
2,6% - marginal shinkage
2 fillings – marginal discolouration
F – pink, silver
M – lemon, blue
MagicFilTM
-
Coloured compomer
Dual setting
Insensitive to moisture
F- , Zn2+ → bactericidal
Setting: 40” → 4’
Croll TP. MagicFil: A colourful kiddie compomer.
Compend Contin Educ dent 2002; 23:1044-1048.
Jafaranta B, Soderholm K-J, Guelmann M. Light
penetration and bond strength of MagicfilTM to
primary molars. Baltimor Convention Center 2005.
blue < white < purple < yellow
Stainless steelcrowns
• ring
• primary molars;
• occlusal rehabilitation;
• long-term solution;
• time-consuming preparation;
• cementation.
Stainless steel crowns
• Tooth preparation and
crown adaptation
Stainless steel crowns
• contact point
preparation
• marginal finishing of the
crown
Aesthetic crowns
• PedoPearlsTM (1980)
• Celluloid crown +
composit
Whiter Biter Crown
II
• „strip crown”
• NuSmileR
• „Pedo Jacket”
• white veneers
Aesthetic crowns
• Kinder Krown Pedo II – colour discrepancy, easy to apply
• Kinder Krown Pedo I, White Steel Crown – not suitable
Source: Hosoya Y, Omachi K, Staninec M.
Colorimetric values of esthetic stainless steel crowns.
Quintessence Int 2002; 33:537-541.
Aesthetic crowns
• PedoPearls (1980)
• polyester/epoxi hybrid coated
prefabcricated aluminium crowns
• minimal occlusion
• contactpoint – metal
• selfcuring or dual curing composit
Indication:
• primary dentition
Contraindications:
• bruxism
• severe orthodontic anomalies
Aesthetic crowns
• NuSmileR
Composite filling
Source: Th. Croll. Restoring four primary incisors using NuSmile Primary Crowns.
Paediatric Restoration, 2007 Dental products Report Europe
Aesthetic crowns
• NuSmileR
• 25-30%
Source: Th. Croll. Restoring four primary incisors using NuSmile Primary Crowns.
Paediatric Restoration, 2007 Dental Products Report Europe
FISSURESEALANT
MATERIALS
• Bis-GMA
• GIC
FISSURESEALANT
MATERIALS
White/
opaque
Toothcoloured
Clear
Coloured
Colourchannging
Chroma
Bis-GMA – adverse effects
BISPHENOL-A
METACRYLIC
ACID
• LOCAL
- CARIES INCIPIENS sealing;
- pulp – phosphoric acid;
- gingival irritation - fluoride;
• SYSTEMIC
- allergy, anaphylactic reaction ,asthma;
- carcinogenic, teratogenic
CleanProTM
„Colour changing”
Fissure sealant
Helioseal
Clear Chroma
3M - ESPE
IVOCLARVIVADENT
CleanProTM – „No rinse sealant technique”
• Self etching: 15” - AdperTM PromptTM L-PopTM;
• No need for rinse;
• Only for occlusal surfaces;
• self curing
fissure sealer
EMBRACE - WetBond
• Insensitive to moisture
• No bond necessary.
Pulpdent,J.P.O’Donnell
InTen-S
• Light curing composite
• ↓ polym. shrinkage: 1,6%;
• Cavity preparation I – V, FS, primary dentition,
ceramic veneers reparation
VOCO – ADMIRA SEAL
• ORMOCER based
• = organically modified ceramic
• biocompatibility
• minimal shrinkage
• better adhesive properties
• high filled : 54%
• 0,7 μm ø glass ceramic parts
• thixotropic.
VITAL AMPUTATION
(PULPOTOMY)
PUPLDRESSING MATERIALS
• Medication for damaged primary pulps.
= controversy discussion for many years:
• Calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)2;
• MTA;
• Iron sulphate Fe2(SO4)3;
• Formocresol after Buckley (1904);
• Glutaraldehyde 2-5%.
ROOTCANAL FILLING
MATERIALS
PROPERTIES:
No irritation;
Form stability;
Radiopaque;
No solubility;
Wall coating;
(biocompatibility);
Antiseptic and bacteriostatic;
Easy to remove;
No discoloration.
British Endodontic Society: Guidelines for root canal treatment
ROOTCANAL FILLING MATERIALS
• ADULT ENDODONTIC THERAPY
Composition
Product name
Company
Cink-oxyd-eugenol
Aptal Harz,
Hermetic
Speiko
Lege Artis
Epoxyresin
AH26, AH26 Plus
Dentsply
DeTrey
Metacrylate
Polyhydroxi-metilmetacrylate
Hydron
Hydron Canada
Polyketon
Diaket
ESPE
Polydimetil-siloxan
Roeko Seal Automix Roeko
Salycilate and Ca(OH)2
Apexit/Sealapex
Glassionomer cement
Ketac Endo/ Endion ESPE/Voco
Vivadent/Kerr
ROOTCANAL FILLING
MATERIALS
• ADULT ENDODONTIC THERAPY
~
Composition
Product name
Company
Paraformaldehid
N2 Universal
Hager& Werken
Cortikosteroid
Endomethasone
Pharma-Dental
Hexachlorofen, dichlorofen
Diaket A
ESPE
Mineral Trioxide Agregate
ProRoot MTA
Denstply
GUTTAPERCHA
• Properties:
• less solubility;
• good handling;
• no tissue irritation;
• no deformation;
• solubility in organic solvents:
xylol, chloroform, eucalypt;
• X-ray opacity;
• biological neutrality;
• easy to remove.
• deformation under pressure: easy to
press through the apex;
• not rigid enough: difficult to apply in
narrow root canals;
• sealer application for wall-coating.
Thank you for your kind
attention!
Related documents