Download PPT

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
The final laser optic:
options, requirements & damage threats
Mark S. Tillack
ARIES Project Meeting
Princeton, NJ
18-20 September 2000
Geometry of the final laser optics
(20 m)
(30 m)
Prometheus-L reactor building layout
(SOMBRERO
values in red)
Mirrors vs. transmissive wedges
metal mirror
Fused silica wedge
•
Used in Prometheus-L and Sombrero
•
Used in DPSSL power plant study
•
Tighter tolerances on surface finish
•
Neutron damage concerns:
•
Low damage threshold larger optics
(tends to result in less sensitivity to defects)
•
–
absorption, color centers
B-integral effects
Why Aluminum is a Good Choice
Multi-layer dielectric mirrors are doubtful due to rapid
degradation by neutrons
Al is a commonly used mirror material
• usually protected (Si2O3),
but can be used bare
• easy to machine, easy to deposit
Thin, protective, transparent oxide
100
Reflectivity, %
Good reflectance into the UV
Normal incidence reflectivity of metals
95
90
Al
85
Ag
Au
Normal incidence damage threshold
~0.2 J/cm2 @532 nm, 10 ns
80
250
500
750
Wavelength, nm
1000
S-polarized waves exhibit high
reflectivity at shallow angles of incidence
Al2O3 reflectivity at 532 nm
Aluminum reflectivity at 532 nm
1
1
s-polarized
0.75
Reflectivity
Reflectivity
0.95
0.9
p-polarized
0.85
0.5
0.25
0.8
0
0.75
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Angle of incidence
70
80
90
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
angle of incidence
70
80
90
Reflection of s-polarized (TE) waves
including thin oxide coating
Operation of the fused silica wedges
Orth, Payne & Krupke, Nuclear Fusion 36(1) 1996.
•
•
Linear array used in DPSSL study,
coupled to slab design of gain medium.
5˚ wedge, angled at 56˚
Brewster's angle
Amplifier slab
62 cm
•
•
•
Key concern is laser absorption -- 8% after 1 hr.
irradiation.
Operated at 400˚C for continuous annealing of
defects
60 times worse at 248 nm vs. 355 nm
57 cm
Threat Spectra
Two main concerns:
• Damage that increases absorption (<1%)
• Damage that modifies the wavefront –
–
spot size/position (200mm/20mm) and spatial uniformity (1%)
Final Optic Threat
Nominal Goal
Optical damage by laser
>5 J/cm2 threshold (normal to beam)
Nonuniform ablation by x-rays
Nonuniform sputtering by ions
Wavefront distortion of <l/3* (~100 nm)
(6x108 pulses in 2 FPY:
2.5x106 pulses/atom layer removed
Defects and swelling induced
by g-rays and neutrons
Absorption loss of <1%
Wavefront distortion of < l/3
Contamination from condensable
materials (aerosol and dust)
Absorption loss of <1%
>5 J/cm2 threshold
Diffraction and Wavefront Distortions
Diffraction-limited spot size:
do = 4 l f M/pD
l = 1/3 mm
f = 30 m (distance to lens)
do = 200 mm (zoomed)
D=1m
M <16
• “There is no standard theoretical approach for combining random
wavefront distortions of individual optics” (ref: Orth)
• Each l/3 of wavefront distortion translates into roughly a doubling of
the minimum spot size (ref: Orth)
Proposed Design Solutions
Threat
SOMBRERO
Prometheus-L
DPSSL study
Laser damage
mirror size
mirror size, coatings
continuous anneal
X-ray ablation
gas jet/shutter*
Xe gas, plasma closure
(1 Torr Ar)
Ion sputtering
gas jet/shutter*
Xe gas , plasma closure
not addressed
Radiation damage
lifetime limit
(unknown)
Ne gas
continuous anneal
Contamination
gas jet/shutter,*
cleaning system
mechanical shutter,
plasma closure
not addressed
*per Bieri
Laser damage threshhold of GIMM’s
• If damage threshold scales as (1-R), then we should be able to obtain
J/cm2 at 85˚.
• With cos q=0.0872, the transverse energy is >20 J/cm2
• For a 1.2 MJ driver energy and 60 beams, each beam is ~1 m2
85ϋ
1m
stiff, lightweight, actively cooled, neutron transparent substrate
11.5 m
2
Gas protection of beamlines
• Beamline volume = 7.7 m3
• Mass @1 Torr = 60 g (7700 Torr-liters)
• A credible turbopump speed is 50 m3/s
(50 Torr-l/s @1 mTorr)
10~15 m
coverage fraction ~1%
(60 beams)
1m
1 Torr
25 cm
1 mTorr
pulsed or
steady
gas puff
chamber
• Possible solution: evaporation/recondensation
• Reduce pressure difference (e.g., 10 mTorr --> 100 mTorr)
vacuum vessel
Neutron and gamma effects
• Conductivity decrease due to point defects, transmutations, surface
roughening
–
Estimated in Prometheus at ~0.5% decrease in reflectivity (ref: private
conversation) -- need to check this
• Differential swelling and creep
–
–
–
Swelling values of 0.05-0.1% per dpa in Al (ref. Prometheus)
The laser penetration depth is d=l/4pk where k>10, so the required thickness
of Al is only ~10 nm. Swelling in Al can be controlled by keeping it thin. The
substrate is the real concern.
Porous (10-15%) SiC is expected to have very low neutron swelling.
• Absorption band at 215 nm in fused silica
Final Optics Tasks
• Re-assess protection schemes in more detail
– In previous studies, issues were identified and potential design solutions
proposed, but detailed analysis of phenomena was not performed
• Correlate damage mechanisms with beam degradation
– Estimate defect and contamination rates from all threat spectra
– Analyze result of mirror defects and deformations on beam
characteristics
• System integration
– Flesh out the beam steering and alignment issues
– Integrate with target injection and tracking system
High conversion efficiency is achievable
with wall temperatures under 1000˚C
First wall material
TFW
Tcoolant
h
ARIES-RS
vanadium alloy
700˚C
610˚C
45%
ARIES-ST
ODS ferritic steel
600˚C
700˚C
45%
ARIES-AT
SiC/SiC
1000˚C
1100˚C
59%
Blanket designs for high efficiency
•
•
•
•
Use neutrons (80% of power) to maximize outlet temperature
Segment radially and optimize routing
Use thermal insulation if necessary
Optimize conversion cycle
ARIES-AT
ARIES-ST
He-cooled Ferritic Steel
18
10
3.5
SiC
ARIES-RS
232
Pb83Li17
18
250