* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download No Slide Title
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
New Antistaphylococcal Agents: Linezolid, Daptomycin, and Tigecycline Cary Engleberg, M.D. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School Linezolid (Zyvox®) Linezolid (Zyvox®) Pharmacodynamics of linezolid • Peak concentration of 18µg/ml in 1 -2h • • post-dose Elimination half-life = 4.5 - 5.5 hours Parameter predicting successful therapy: – Time above MIC – Target = >40% of dosing interval Mean plasma linezolid levels following equivalent (375mg) oral and IV doses p.o. (Fasted) (n=12) 10 Plasma linezolid conc. (µg/mL) IV (n=12) Bioavailability = 100% 8 6 4 2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Hours After Administration Source: Pharmacia & Upjohn. 18 20 22 24 Linezolid concentrations after 14 days of steady state, bid dosing (Stalker, et al. ICAAC, Toronto, Ontario. 1997) 375 mg BID (n=12) 20 625 mg BID (n=12) 16 MIC-90 S. aureus MIC-90 enterococci Linezolid 12 Conc. (µg/mL) 8 MIC-90 pneumococcus 4 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Hours After Last Dose 3 Linezolid vs. vancomycin in MRSA infections (Stevens et al. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34:1481-90) Cure rate (%) of evaluable MRSA Infection Linezolid 600mg bid Skin/soft tissue 27/34 (79.4) Pneumonia 9/12 (75) UTI 0/1 (0) Other sites 3/6 (50) Bacteremia 9/15 (60) All 48/68 (70.6) Vanco 1gm BID 22/30 (73.3) 12/16 (75) 1/1 (100) 2/3 (66.7) 7/10 (70) 44/60 (73.3) Linezolid concentrations in joints and bone (Rana et al. 2002) Sub-MIC effect of linezolid on bacterial virulence • Decreased hemolysin and coagulase • • expression in S. aureus at 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 MIC Decreased streptolysin O and DNAse production in group A streptococcus Concentrations below the MIC potentiate the opsonophagocytosis of S. aureus and S. pyogenes Resistance to linezolid • Originally thought to be unlikely given chemical • origin and mode of action of the drug 2 of 169 patients treated on a compassionate use protocol developed resistant strains – rRNA mutation (G2576U) – Both involved prolonged indwelling lines • Induction of resistance in the laboratory by prolonged passage: – in staphylococci, frequency is 10-9 - 10-11 – among enterococci, E. faecalis is more likely to develop resistance (G2576U) than E. faecium Linezolid dosing and use • 600mg IV or po q 12 h for serious • • • infections No adjustment necessary for renal dysfunction Adverse effects: most common is GI disturbance; thrombocytopenia after 17 days MAO inhibitor activity: may enhance pressor responses with adrenergic drugs Daptomycin (Cubicin®) Daptomycin Fermentation product of Streptomyces roseosporus Mechanism of action: Interacts with the bacterial plasma membrane via the lipid portion to form a pore. Metabolic death occurs by leakage of electrolytes without lysis of the bacteria Cyclic peptide Lipid (acyl) chain Features of daptomycin kinetics • Linear kinetics • Half life = 8.5 hrs. • 87-94% plasma protein bound • Urine excretion - 80% (66% active) • Limited metabolism; No significant • CyP450 interactions Requires physiologic concentrations of calcium to be active in vitro Daptomycin in the lung • When distributed into the lung, • • daptomycin partitions into the surfactant layer via its lipid moeity. This is a disadvantage, in that little free drug is available to interact with bacteria. Daptomycin should NOT be used to treat pneumonia Comparison of daptomycin activity with other antimicrobial agents MIC90 (µg/ml) Daptomycin Vancomycin Linezolid Synercid® MSSA (50) 0.13 1.0 4.0 1.0 MRSA (50) 0.13 1.0 4.0 1.0 MSSE (25) 0.5 1.0 4.0 0.5 MRSE (50) 0.25 1.0 4.0 0.25 E. faecalis** (25) 1.0 64.0 4.0 16.0 E. faecium** (25) 4.0 64.0 4.0 4.0 **includes some VRE (from Rybak et al: Antimicrob Ag Chemother 2000) Time-kill analysis against MRSA 10 Control 9 8 7 CFU/ml 6 Linezolid Synercid® 5 4 3 2 0 8 24 hours Rybak et al: AAC April 2000 Vancomycin Daptomycin Time-kill analysis against VRE 9 Control Vancomycin 8 7 CFU/ml 6 5 Linezolid Synercid® Daptomycin 4 3 2 0 8 24 hours Rybak et al: AAC April 2000 Daptomycin in S. aureus endocarditis (Fowler et al. NEJM 2006;355:653-65) Daptomycin toxicity • In animal toxicity studies, muscle damage with increased CPK occurred when the drug was dosed frequently • Because daptomycin is rapidly bactericidal, it can be administered once a day to achieve high peaks alternating with periods whent the drug is cleared. • Periods of subtherapeutic levels of daptomycin during the dosing interval in humans makes the likelihood of muscle damage every small • Long term treatment should be followed with weekly CPK levels Tigecycline (Tygacil®) Drug modifications to avoid resistance • Tetracyclines and macrolides both inhibit protein synthesis by binding to the ribosome • Two major types of resistance occurs against both drug classes: – Modification of the ribosomal binding site – Efflux pumps that expel the drug from the bacterial cytoplasm • Minocycline and clarithromycin have been chemically modified by adding side chains to the basic molecule. This has two effects: – Increased ribosomal binding, even with modification – Drug not recognized or mobilized by the efflux system Drug Modifications (additions of side chains) telithromycin clarithromycin minocycline Active against macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae tigecycline Active against many resistant Gram-negatives, MRSA and VRE Tigecycline • Mechanism of action: –binds to the 30S ribosome and blocks entry of amino-acyl tRNAs to block protein synthesis (like all tetracyclines) –Bacteriostatic, not cidal • Kinetics: –T1/2=24-48 hrs –Distributes to all tissues (large volume of distribution); including alveolar lining fluid • Dosing (adult): 100mg loading, then 50mg q12h Tigecycline: spectrum of activity • Staphylococci (including MRSA and MRSE) • Enterococci (including VRE) • S. pneumoniae (including pen-resistant) • Most Gram-negatives (e.g., E. coli, Citrobacter spp, Klebsiella spp, Serratia spp, Acinetobacter spp, Stenotrophomonas, Haemophilus) • Anaerobes (e.g., Bacteroides, Clostridia) • Chlamydiae, mycoplasmas • NOT Pseudomonas Tigecycline: adverse effects • Nausea (30%); vomiting (20%) –Most common in older women –due to serotonin release and modified by ondansetron • Dental staining (not used in pregnancy or • • children) Decreased clearance of warfarin No significant P450 interactions Tigecycline: studies of efficacy • Non-inferior to imipenem in >1000 adults • • with complicated intra-abdominal infections (2 phase III studies) Non-inferior to vancomycin+aztreonam in complicated skin and soft tissue infections (2 phase III studies) Tigecycline had more nausea/vomiting in all studies