* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download UK Monetary Policy
Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup
Fear of floating wikipedia , lookup
Non-monetary economy wikipedia , lookup
Austrian business cycle theory wikipedia , lookup
Modern Monetary Theory wikipedia , lookup
Business cycle wikipedia , lookup
Helicopter money wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative easing wikipedia , lookup
Money supply wikipedia , lookup
Interest rate wikipedia , lookup
Inflation targeting wikipedia , lookup
How Effective has UK Monetary Policy been? Brian Ellis and Colin Ellis To see more of our products visit our website at www.anforme.co.uk • For ten years the picture looked good. • The Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee was established in 1997. • Its success shifted expectations towards low and stable inflation. • This in turn moderated pricing decisions and wage demands and made the MPC’s job easier. • By 2010 the wheels of the monetary policy machine had not completely come off but had started wobbling. • Throughout 2010 inflation was above the CPI target of 2% and above its acceptable range of 1-3%. • This was contributed to by a fall in sterling which pushed up import prices. • There was also a rise in world commodity prices, especially oil. • The government itself also raised VAT from 15% to 17.5% in January 2010. • MPC has continued to forecast a fall in inflation. • They have not taken anti-inflationary measures partly because of the time lag of about one year before monetary policy takes effect. • The Bank’s August 2010 prediction was that inflation would not return to target until the start of 2012. • The Bank Rate has stuck at 0.5% although the MPC has been divided. • Monetary policy works by influencing aggregate demand. • The link between changes in the base rate and aggregate demand is summed up by the monetary policy transmission mechanism. • Here a rise in the base rate will lead to a rise in other interest rates in the economy. • Households will then find saving more rewarding and borrowing more expensive. • This should case a fall in consumption, which is the biggest component of aggregate demand. • The plunge in the base rate as a result of the recession reduced rates to savers. • Typical savings accounts now offer about 1% interest, whilst CPI inflation is over 3%. • The real return on saving has now been negative for 18 months. • Classical theory suggests consumers should spend more and save less as a result. • In reality UK savers have saved more of their income than when previously there was a positive return on saving. • Before the recession the UK experienced negative saving where household borrowing exceeded saving. • But in 2009 the savings ratio went above 8%. • This shows that other factors can have more influence than interest rates. • Looking at borrowers we can see that there are even more problems with the transmission mechanism. • Recession has made people more risk averse, so borrowing is less attractive. • Also, commercial banks lending rates have not exactly followed base rate downwards as theory predicts. • 0.5% is considered as being as low as base rate can go. • Even this did not generate as much stimulus to aggregate demand as the MPC considered desirable. • They therefore introduced quantitative easing (QE). • QE involves the Bank of England buying bonds from sellers who then initially deposit the payment into their bank accounts. • These deposits are liquid assets which enable banks to lend more if they wish to. • The MPC appreciates that ‘expansionary’ low interest rates and QE have had only limited impact in reviving the economy. • GDP is only expected to return to pre-recession levels by 2012. • On a narrow view the MPC is not concerned with recession, just inflation. • However, the Monetary Policy Framework says that: “The (MPC) remit recognises the role of price stability in achieving economic stability more generally, and in providing the right conditions for sustainable growth in output and employment.” • The medium-term priority of the Chancellor of the Exchequer is to remove the Public Sector Borrowing Requirement and stop growth in the national debt. • This approach reflects the divide between two major approaches to macroeconomic policy. • It could be that spending cuts and tax increases perpetuate weakness in aggregate demand, leading to capacity being scrapped and increased unemployment and skill loss. • Keynesians believe that weak aggregate demand can be boosted by government fiscal injection. • This could lead to higher employment and tax receipts and lower benefit payments. • The Public Sector Borrowing Requirement should then fall automatically. • Some broadly ‘classical’ economists welcome a reduction in the size, role and spending of the public sector. • The UK spending cuts and tax increases of autumn 2010 are expected to lead to nearly one million job losses, particularly in the public sector. • The Chancellor believes the private sector will expand to take up the slack. • But, public sector cuts will reduce both household disposable income, and hence consumption, and government spending. • Other governments in Europe are also planning to reduce fiscal deficits. • But Japan has a gross national debt in excess of 250% of GDP yet continues with expansionary measures. • The USA has a public sector deficit of more than $1,000 billion per annum, and seems headed for policy deadlock between ‘hawks’ and ‘doves’. • The Bank of England and the MPC should not discuss fiscal policy, much less oppose it. • Using monetary policy to counteract government fiscal tightening would raise serious questions about the MPC’s role. • But, those MPC members considering additional QE are concerned with the impact of weak demand on medium-term inflationary pressures. • Weak demand could push inflation below target, once the current short-term dynamics abate. • However, some MPC members worry about second-round effects, where above-target inflation triggers strong earnings growth, pushing inflation higher in turn. • How far is the MPC fully independent of the government? • To what extent can fiscal and monetary policies operate independently of each other? • After recent difficulties, how might the MPC rebuild confidence that it has control of inflation? • Does increasing international integration leave price levels in one country at the mercy of global markets? • Will economists ever resolve the tension between those who favour a ‘classical’ approach which gives maximum freedom to market forces and others who favour more regulation and government intervention?