Download Bray - X-rays from Solar System Objects

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup

Orrery wikipedia , lookup

Earth's rotation wikipedia , lookup

Late Heavy Bombardment wikipedia , lookup

Sample-return mission wikipedia , lookup

Geomagnetic storm wikipedia , lookup

Corona wikipedia , lookup

Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup

Heliosphere wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
X-RAYS FROM SOLAR
SYSTEM OBJECTS
Evan Bray
Astro 550
Introduction
■ The solar system is a natural laboratory, with a large variety of objects
■ Allows for close-up observations of phenomena that may be happening elsewhere
■ Typically associate X-Rays with ~1 million Kelvin plasmas
– Planets/small bodies are 3-5 orders of magnitude colder!
■ Today we’ll focus on soft X-Rays (200 eV – 2 keV)
Evan Bray
2
Brief History
■ 1950’s: X-Rays discovered from auroral emissions on Earth
■ 1962: Scorpius X-1 discovered during attempt to observe X-Rays from the Moon
■ 1970’s: Apollo 15 & 16 study fluorescently scattered X-Rays from the Moon
■ 1979: Einstein Observatory discovers X-Rays from Jupiter
■ 1996: ROSAT discovers X-Rays from the comet Hyakutake
■ 2000’s: Chandra/XMM-Newton confirm Mars, Venus, and many others as X-Ray emitters
Evan Bray
3
Brief History
Bhardwaj et al. 2010
Evan Bray
4
Important Terms
■ Auroral Region: High-latitude areas where charged
particles collide with Earth’s atmosphere
■ Ionosphere: Upper region of Earth’s atmosphere.
Dominated by particles ionized by solar radiation
■ Heliosphere: The region of space dominated by the Sun
■ Geocorona: Luminous part of outermost regions of Earth’s
atmosphere. Extends to 16R⊕. Emits in FUV.
■ Io Plasma Torus: Ring-shaped cloud of ions around Jupiter
caused by ionizing 1 ton of O per second from Io
Evan Bray
5
Production Mechanisms
1. Collisional excitation of neutral species by charged particles (line emission)
2. Bremsstrahlung from electron collisions with neutrals and ions
3. Elastic & fluorescent scattering of solar X-Ray photons from neutrals
4. Solar wind charge exchange (SWCX)
5. Charge exchange of energetic heavy ions, or direct collisions of ions
■ Energy for these interactions comes from the Sun
Evan Bray
6
Electron Collisions
■ In coronal-type plasmas, atoms are typically highly ionized (high Z)
−13.6 𝑍 2
Energy 𝑒𝑉 ≈
𝑛2
■ Radiative recombination produces continuum emission
■ Can be followed by line emission if the bound state isn’t the ground state
■ Bound-free collisions are responsible for most of the planetary X-Ray luminosity
Evan Bray
7
Electron Collisions – Bremsstrahlung
■ Produced by an electron accelerating in the electric field of an atomic nucleus
■ Key component of solar X-Ray continuum emission (thermal)
■ Responsible for hard X-Rays from terrestrial and Jovian auroras (nonthermal)
– Fast electrons produced in magnetosphere
– Travel along magnetic field lines into atmosphere
Evan Bray
8
Solar Photon Scattering
■ X-Rays can be both elastically scattered and absorbed
■ Soft X-Rays are vastly more likely to be absorbed than scattered
– Scattered X-Rays from Earth have still been observed
– 𝛕~1 for 𝑁𝐻 = 1020
■ X-Ray Scattering albedo for outer planets calculated to be 0.003 (Cravens 2006)
– Total albedo of Jupiter = 0.343
■ K-shell fluorescence usually results in emission of an Auger electron
– Oxygen photon yield is only 0.2% => almost no fluorescence photons!
■ Fluorescence also important for solid surfaces, like the Moon and Saturn’s rings
Evan Bray
9
Solar Wind Charge Exchange (SWCX)
■ Process of solar wind ions colliding with target neutrals
– Proposed in 1997 to explain emissions from comet Hyakutake (Cravens 1997)
– Energy derived from the million degree solar corona
■ Cross sections of ~10−15 𝑐𝑚2
– Several orders of magnitude higher than electron collisions!
■ Creates a cascade of photons as electrons drop to ground state
Evan Bray
10
Solar Wind Charge Exchange (SWCX)
■ Heavy ions make up 0.1% of the solar wind 𝑂7+, 𝑂6+, 𝐶 6+, 𝐶 5+, 𝑁 6+, 𝑁𝑒 8+ , 𝑆𝑖 9+, 𝐹𝑒12+
– Composition is strongly variable in time and location
■ Volume emission rate is given by the following equation
– Must be summed over all target and wind species
■ SWCX is an excellent probe of the solar wind for locations we can’t otherwise reach
– Most notable contributions from Pioneer and Voyager probes
Evan Bray
11
Earth – Auroral Emissions
■ Visible, UV, and X-Ray photons are emitted because of coupling between
ionosphere and magnetosphere.
■ Majority are line emissions of N, O, and Ar. Confirmed by HEAO and
Chandra
– Small, noticeable bremsstrahlung component at high energies
■ Majority of X-Rays are directed normal to magnetic field
– Leads to limb brightening in terrestrial X-Ray images
■ PIXIE instrument was critical in characterizing this phenomena
■ Directly related to solar activity
Bhardwaj et al. 2010
Evan Bray
13
Evan Bray
Bhardwaj et al. 2010
14
Earth – Non-Auroral Emissions
■ Two components: Thomson scattering of solar X-Rays, and absorption
followed by emission of K-lines.
■ Short-lived (~1 ms) X-ray and γ-ray bursts detected above storm cells by
CGRO in the 90’s
– Bremsstrahlung from upward-propagating MeV electrons after a
lightning strike
– No conclusive evidence of mechanism yet. To be studied by future ESA
missions.
■ 𝐿𝑥,𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 60 𝑀𝑊
Evan Bray
15
The Moon
■ Studied close-up by Apollo 15 & 16, and more distantly by ROSAT & Chandra
■ Dominated by fluorescent X-Rays
– Small amounts of scatter solar X-Rays, almost no bremsstrahlung.
– Excellent probe of lunar surface composition!
■
Greater fraction of Al/Si than Earth
– Future missions will obtain ~20-km resolution maps of the surface
■ 𝐿𝑥 = 73 𝑘𝑊
■ “Nightside emission” is actually SWCX with geocoronal H
■ Determining albedo variations with XMM-Newton?
– Not possible at the moment. Need faster CCDs.
Schmitt et al. 1991
Evan Bray
16
Venus
■ Difficult to observe due to distance from the Sun
■ Expected to be an X-Ray source due to proximity to the Sun and
thick atmosphere
■ Observed in 2001 with ACIS-I and ACIS-S
– Primarily fluorescent scattering of C and O. Some N and CO2
■ Extent of limb brightening acts as probe of atmosphere structure,
and response to solar activity
■ Optically bright sources can be challenging => Filter optical by
dispersion!
■ 𝐿𝑥 = 55 𝑀𝑊
Dennerl et al. 2002
Evan Bray
17
Mars
■ First observed with ROSAT in ‘93 with no results. X-Rays detected by
Chandra in 2001
– Dominated by a single O Kα emission line
■ Hypothesis: X-Ray scattering by attogram (10−18 𝑔) dust particles?
– Dust storm was present during first half of observation
– No significant change in X-Ray flux between halves
■ Martian halo detected out to ~3 Mars radii (35 excess photons)
– Different spectral distribution than planetary disk
– Indication of SWCX in Martian exosphere
■ 𝐿𝑥 = 8 𝑀𝑊
Dennerl 2002
Evan Bray
18
Jupiter – Auroral Emission
■ First observed by the International Ultraviolet Explorer, and confirmed by Voyager I
■ Electron vs. heavy ion precipitation
– Early observations made distinction difficult
– ROSAT showed slight preference for heavy ions
■ Spike in emission during collision with Shoemaker-Levy 9
■ Chandra/XMM showed aurora particles originated 20-30 Jupiter radii away
■ Emissions came from higher latitudes than UV auroral zone
– Both regions pulse with 40-minute period
■ Future Jupiter missions include in-situ observations of auroral emissions
■ 𝐿𝑥 = ~700 𝑀𝑊
Evan Bray
19
Bhardwaj et al. 2010
Evan Bray
20
Jupiter – Non-Auroral Emission
■ Low-latitude emissions discovered by ROSAT in 1997
– Initially thought to be S and O ions from the radiation belts
■ Later found to be scattered solar X-Rays
■ Correlation between local magnetic field strength and soft X-Ray
emissions
– Suggests a second component in addition to scattering?
■ Unlike auroral emissions, disk emissions do not significantly vary
in time
■ 𝐿𝑥 = ~1 𝐺𝑊
Gladstone et al. 2002
Evan Bray
21
Saturn
■ First detected by XMM-Newton in 2002
■ Concentrated in low-latitudes
– No apparent polar emissions
– Strong solar flares during observations imply scattered solar X-Rays
■ Chandra showed factor of 2-4 variability on the timescale of days
■ Composition largely similar to that of Jupiter
■ 𝐿𝑥 = 250 𝑀𝑊
Evan Bray
22
Evan Bray
23
Bhardwaj
et al. 2005
Comets
■ Discovered by ROSAT in 1996 while observing comet Hyakutake
■ Initially theorized to be thermal bremsstrahlung from solar
electrons
– Predicted 𝐿𝑥 too low by factor of 100-1000
■ Scattering from attogram dust grains?
– Detected by PUMA dust monitor during Halley flyby
– Can’t create the lines we see in spectra
Lisse et al. 1996
■ Emissions dominated by SWCX in tenuous atmosphere
– No emission from tails
Evan Bray
24
Comets
■ Tells us 4 important characteristics:
1. Spatial morphology
2. Composition
3. Solar wind properties
4. Source of local soft X-Ray background
Bhardwaj et al. 2010
■ Strong correlation with gas production rate and solar O ion flux
– Zero correlation with dust production rate and solar X-Ray
flux
Evan Bray
25
Io Plasma Torus, Galilean Moons, and
Rings of Saturn
■ IPT – Detected by Chandra in 1999
– Very soft spectra, predominantly O6+. Not too highly ionized
– Nonthermal electron bremsstrahlung
■ Galilean Satellites
– Io and Europa detected by Chandra in 1999
■
Based on only ~10 photons each!
– Ganymede and Callisto are likely emitters as well
■ Saturn’s Rings - Detected in 2004 by Chandra
– Based on 42 photons, all in the Oxygen Kα
Evan Bray
26
Diffuse X-Ray Background
■ Background is significantly variable in both time and space.
■ Thermal in origin, dominated by lines
■ Instrumental backgrounds can also be comparable to diffuse background
■ Angular size of source effects quality of data
– Planets tend to span small portion of the FOV
– Cometary emission can fill entire FOV. Makes background determination
difficult
Evan Bray
27
Evan Bray
28
Evan Bray
29
Summary
■ Almost all solar system X-Ray emission is powered by the Sun
■ Charge exchange, scattering, and bremsstrahlung are the dominant processes
– Depends on size, composition, and distance from the Sun
■ Most emissions are highly dependent on stellar activity
■ Very low luminosities necessitate sensitive equipment and low backgrounds
■ XMM-Newton and Chandra are workhorses for small bodies
– ROSAT useful for diffuse emissions from extended sources
Evan Bray
30