Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chemotherapy in Anal cancer ?Lessons for vulva ANZGOG 2013 Michelle Vaughan Anal v vulval etiology Anal Age Path HPV 60s All grades 70-85% Precursor AIN Risks Sex/smoking Vulval Type1 35-65 More G3 >60% Type 2 55-85 More G1 <15% VIN Sex/smoking Lichen sclerosis - VULVAL & ANAL CANCER LOCAL CONTROL is dominant aim of treatment Indolent natural history Mets are rare (<10% as a 1st event) Chemo given to help RT with local control (Uncommon paradigm for chemotherapists!) RCTs in ANAL CANCER n UKCCCR/ACT 585 Add chemo? 1996/2010 EORTC QUESTION 110 1997 RTOG 291 Need MMC? 1996 RTOG 644 Cis v MMC? 2008/11 UKCCCR/ACT 940 (2009) ACCORD -03 307 Chemo induct? HD RT? 5yr LFR % 5yr PFS % 5 yr OS % √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ - - - - - - - - Does chemo add to RT? n Compared ACT I 585 EORTC 110 5yr Local failure % 5yr PFS % 5 yr OS % RT - 25 +15 60 35 35 50 ns RT + 5FU/MMC - 15 +20 50 35 40 60 ns Chemo improves local control & PFS 15-25% Chemo doesn’t affect survival Arnott Lancet 1996 & Northover BJC 2010, Barteleink JCO 1997 Strong effect on Loco-regional relapse Northover 2010 BJC 102:1123 Insignificant survival benefit HR 0.86 CI 0.7 – 1.04 Northover 2010 BJC 102:1123 Anal cancer: Is MMC necessary? RTOG n Compared 4yr Local failure 291 5FU MMC RT 5FU RT +20% -20% 35 15 4yr PFS OS ns 50 70 YES, unfortunately it is. Flam 1996 JCO 14:2527-39 Anal cancer: Is MMC necessary? RTOG n Compared 4yr Local failure 291 5FU MMC RT 5FU RT +20% -20% 35 15 4yr PFS OS ns 50 70 YES, unfortunately it is. Bother. Flam 1996 JCO 14:2527-39 MMC is toxic …So can we replace it? Cisplatin instead of MMC? n RTOG 98-11 ACT II UKCCCR 644 940 Compared 5FU MMC RT 5yr LFR 5yr PFS OS + 8% -10 -7 25 33 5868 7178 5% col 75 85 5FU Cis RT MMC + 5FU remains the standard Adjani JAMA 2008 & ASCO 2011, James ASCO 2012 G3-4 Toxicity: Cis v MMC Haem Infection Non haem Severe long RTOG 10mg x 2 CIS MMC 44 61 10 17 65 61 10 11 ACTII 12mg x 1 CIS MMC 13 25 3 3 74 74 - Can we reduce the MMC dose? Dose Haem tox G 3-4 RTOG 10mg/m2 D1 + 29 61% UKCCCR ACT II 12mg/m2 D1 25% TOXICITY: Better with D1 only mitomycin EFFICACY???: Who knows? So, What MMC dose? • We will never know • Either is reasonable • If you use the RTOG 10mg/m2 D1 & D29 remember to: – Do weekly FBC – Dose reduce if nadirs wcc < 2.4! SUMMARY Anal cancer is similar to Vulval cancer In anal cancer several large RCTS say: - Chemo adds PFS to RT - MMC adds PFS to 5FU chemo - MMC is better than cisplatin in 1 of 2 trials - More haem tox ?Argue for 5FU/MMC thank you Delayed deaths problematic • Marked excess OTHER deaths in the CRT group, peaking at 5 years (+9% p0.001): – Cancer 2yr – Cardiovasc – Pulmonary 3 v 1% 5 v 3% 1 v 0% (13yr =12 v 6% p= 0.03) Northover 2010 BJC 102:1123 Details of excess deaths: • Cardiovascular– Spread in time course, median time about 1 year • Second cancers - Mostly lung cancer (reflecting shared etiology), 8 v 2 in 1st 5 years, 26 v 16 after 5 years SO: Late (+ acute) chemo toxicity possibly cancelling out survival benefit from reduction in anal cancer death in this population ANAL CANCER RCTs (full) UKCCCR n Compared 585 5FU MMC RT RT ACT I 1996 Northover 2010 EORTC 22861 110 Bartelink 1997 RTOG 87-04 291 Flam 1996 RTOG 98-11 644 Ajani 2008/11 UKCCCR# Conroy 2009 5FU MMC RT 5FU RT 5FU MMC RT 5FU Cis RT 5 yr CFS % 5yr PFS % 5 yr OS % - 25 +10 +13 57 32 37 47 34 47 53 58 - 16 +32 +18 48 32 (4577) (42 60) -18 +12 +22 34 16* 59 71* 51 73* 54 58 67 76 -8 + 10# + 7# 33 25 58 68 7178 940 5FU MMC RT 5FU Cis RT ns ns 75 3yr ? 307 5FU Cis induct HD RT 28 83 70 78 ACT II 2009 ACCORD-03# 5FU MMC RT RT 5yr LFR % P<.001 P <0.01 P<0.05 *4yr #abs only (x)=from graph