* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Database System Architectures
Extensible Storage Engine wikipedia , lookup
Serializability wikipedia , lookup
Microsoft Jet Database Engine wikipedia , lookup
Microsoft SQL Server wikipedia , lookup
Functional Database Model wikipedia , lookup
Relational model wikipedia , lookup
Tandem Computers wikipedia , lookup
Open Database Connectivity wikipedia , lookup
Clusterpoint wikipedia , lookup
DATABASE SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE Sayed Ahmed Computer Engineering, BUET, Bangladesh MSc, Computer Science, U of Manitoba, Canada Owner/President/Architect/Developer Justetc (Just et cetera) Technologies http://www.justetc.net http://sayed.justetc.net sayed@justetc.net FREE TRAINING BY JUSTETC  Training and Education in Bangla:    http://Bangla.SaLearningSchool.com http://Blog. SaLearningSchool.com Training and Education in English:    http://www.SaLearningSchool.com http://English.SaLearningSchool.com http://www.SitesTree.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ask questions and get answers  http://Ask.JustEtc.net -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Offline IT Training:  http://University.JustEtc.net LEARNING OBJECTIVES Understand different database system architectures  Comparison of different database system architectures  Note:   Bangladesh  Subject  Grade Polytechnique Institute Code: 6658, will be helpful 9 to 12 (Bangladesh) students may be benefited DATABASE SYSTEM ARCHITECTURES DBMS architecture depends on the Computer System Architecture  DBMS architecture types   Centralized Systems  Client--Server Systems  Parallel Systems  Distributed Systems CENTRALIZED SYSTEMS The DBMS resides, Run, and sits on a single computer system  The DBMS does not interact with other computer systems  Can be called One Tier Architectures  Microsoft Access  Mainframe computer databases  Reference:   http://www.windowsecurity.com/whitepapers/software _engineering/An-Overview-of-Common-DatabaseArchitectures.html A CENTRALIZED COMPUTER SYSTEM CLIENT-SERVER SYSTEMS  Client-server computer systems  Server systems satisfy requests generated at m client systems as shown in the image below  DBMS located in the server also respond to the clients similar way CLIENT-SERVER SYSTEMS (CONT.)  Database functionality can be divided into:    Back-end: manages access structures, query evaluation and optimization, concurrency control and recovery. Front-end: consists of tools such as forms, report-writers, and graphical user interface facilities. The interface between the front-end and the back-end is through SQL or through an application program interface. CLIENT-SERVER SYSTEMS (CONT.)  Examples  MS SQL Server, Oracle, Sybase in general Can be of Thin Client and Fat-Client type  Server systems can be broadly categorized into two kinds:   transaction  widely  data servers (thin-client) used in relational database systems servers (usually fat-client),  used in object-oriented database systems TRANSACTION SERVERS  Also called query server systems or SQL server systems;  clients send requests to the server system where the transactions are executed, and results are shipped back to the client. TRANSACTION SERVER PROCESS STRUCTURE  Transaction Server Processes  Server processes  Lock manager process  Database writer process  Log writer process  Checkpoint process  Process monitor process DATA SERVERS  Used in LANs, where     Ship data to client machines where processing is performed     there is a very high speed connection between the clients and the server the client machines are comparable in processing power to the server machine the tasks are compute intensive And then ship results back to the server machine. This architecture requires full back-end functionality at the clients. Used in many object-oriented database systems Issues:     Page-Shipping versus Item-Shipping Locking Data Caching Lock Caching PARALLEL SYSTEMS     One single DBMS in a parallel computer The same DBMS can be accessed by the processors and can span over multiple hard drives if any in that computer Parallel database systems consist of multiple processors and multiple disks connected by a fast interconnection network. A coarse-grain parallel machine   A massively parallel or fine grain parallel   consists of a small number of powerful processors machine utilizes thousands of smaller processors. Two main performance measures:   throughput --- the number of tasks that can be completed in a given time interval response time --- the amount of time it takes to complete a single task from the time it is submitted PARALLEL DATABASE ARCHITECTURES  Shared memory  processors  Shared disk  processors  share a common memory share a common disk Shared nothing  processors share neither a common memory nor common disk  Hierarchical  hybrid of the above architectures PARALLEL DATABASE ARCHITECTURES DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS Data spread over multiple machines (also referred to as sites or nodes.  Network interconnects the machines  Data shared by users on multiple machines  DISTRIBUTED DATABASES  Homogeneous distributed databases    Heterogeneous distributed databases    Same software/schema on all sites, data may be partitioned among sites Goal: provide a view of a single database, hiding details of distribution Different software/schema on different sites Goal: integrate existing databases to provide useful functionality Differentiate between local and global transactions   A local transaction accesses data in the single site at which the transaction was initiated. A global transaction either accesses data in a site different from the one at which the transaction was initiated or accesses data in several different sites. TRADE-OFFS IN DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS  Sharing data   Autonomy   each site is able to retain a degree of control over data stored locally. Higher system availability through redundancy   users at one site able to access the data residing at some other sites. data can be replicated at remote sites, and system can function even if a site fails. Disadvantage: added complexity required to ensure proper coordination among sites.    Software development cost Greater potential for bugs Increased processing overhead QUESTIONS? HTTP://ASK.JUSTETC.NET
 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                             
                                            