* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Cardiac Box... penetrating trauma
History of invasive and interventional cardiology wikipedia , lookup
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Cardiothoracic surgery wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Myocardial infarction wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
The Cardiac Box: Penetrating Trauma Bradley J. Phillips, M.D. Burn-Trauma-ICU Adults & Pediatrics “The Cardiac Box” Boundaries Ballistics: Pathophysiology Epidemiology Cardiothoracic trauma accounts for 25% of trauma deaths • Types – Blunt 70% • MVA 70% – Penetrating 30% • Stab wounds 60-70% • GSW 40-30% Chest Trauma - Incidence Blunt Penetrating No. Mortality No. Mortality Diaphragm 16 38% 40 28% Heart 125 12% 15 60% Hemothorax 97 44% 62 26% Pneumothorax 161 25% 45 18% Lungs 129 26% 28 25% Great vessels 15 50% 15 27% MIEMS, 1990 Deadly Dozen • Lethal Six • Hidden Six – Airway obstruction – Tension PTX – Thoracic aortic disrupt – Cardiac tamponade – Open PTX – Blunt cardiac injury – Diaphragmatic tear – Massive hemothorax – Esophageal injury – Flail chest – Pulmonary contusion – Tracheobronchial injury “The Box”: Injuries • • • • Cardiac/pericardium “Great” vessels Esophagus Intrathoracic trachea/main bronchus Penetrating Cardiac Injury • Death (bleeding and/or tamponade) – All penetrating cardiac injury = 81% • GSW quicker death – Reach hospital • In “extremis” – 1/3 can be saved – successful ED thoracotomy if < 5 mins of arrest • OR (signs of life/recordable BP) – survival rates GSW = 70% – survival rats SW = 85% Cardiac Injury: Pathophysiology • Pericardial Tamponade – Survive 15 to 30 mins after injury = small injury – “double-edged sword” • prolonged life by reducing blood loss • fatal by interfering with venous return/diastolic filling – Increases the likelihood of successful ED thoracotomy – Intrapericardial pressure • 80-100 cc without increase • additional 20-40 cc = double the pressure Diagnosis • Physical exam – Beck’s triad • distended neck veins, hypotension, muffled heart tones • not sensitive or specific – false + or - in 1/3 of cases • neck vein distension requires partial fluid resuscitation • rapid fluid resuscitation = improvement in vital signs – other etiologies • tension PTX, cardiac failure, mediastinal hematoma – Kussmaul signs • increased neck vein distension during inspiration • pulsus paradoxus Diagnostic Tests • • • • • • CVP tracings EKG Echocardiography CT scan Pericardiocentesis Subxiphoid pericardiotomy Echocardiography • Transthoracic (TTE) or transesophageal (TEE) • Problems – availability – experience of technician – false positive/negative: 5-10% Echocardiography Normal Positive Role of Echocardiography Rozycki et al, J Trauma, 1999 (Grady) – Accurate for acute hemopericardium – Sonographer • Surgeon (course trained) or cardiology (4 centers) • Technicians ( 1 center) – Patients = 261 – Positive exam = immediate operation Role of Echocardiography Rozycki et al, J Trauma, 1999 Role of Echocardiography • Results – Mean time 12 minutes – Overall • True negatives 225 (86%) • True positives 29 (11%) • False negatives 0 • False positives 7 (3%) – Sonographer • Surgeons: 100% sensitive, 97% specific • Cardiologist: 100% sensitive, 100% specific Rozycki et al, J Trauma, 1999 Role of Echocardiography False Positives Rozycki et al, J Trauma, 1999 Role of Echocardiography • Potential deficiencies – no prospectively randomized to U/S vs window – not a consecutive sample – not all patients received follow-up after d/c • Lessons – – – – immediate availability of U/S learning curve of technique ? role of repeat echo not as effective in massive PTX/hemothorax/obesity CT scan • ? Role to r/o pericardial fluid • Mediastinal trajectory – may avoid unnecessary tests – requires hemodynamically stable patient – Grossman et al, J Trauma, 1998 (U Penn) • • • • • Retrospective study (6 years) Thoracic CT 15 patients 9/15 excluded transmediastinal trajectory 6/15 additional studies performed (2 required OR) no complications in CT excluded group Pericardiocentesis • Used more in “medical-tamponade” • Removal of 5-10 cc =CO by 25-50% • Problems – not sensitive or specific • Demetriades, Ann Surg, 1985 – false-negative = – false-positive = 80% 33% – iatrogenic injury to the heart (frequent R ventricle) – delay in needed operation – blood clotted (1/2 to 2/3 of amount) Pericardiocentesis Pericardial Window • Hemodynamically “stable” • Types – subxphoid – intraperitoneal • Local vs general anesthesia • Diagnostic/therapeutic • Problems – only 18% positive for blood – ? Non intervention = ? outcome Pericardial Window: technique Treatment Cardiac Injury • • • • Aggressive fluid adminstration +/- Pericardiocentesis +/- Pericardial window ED thoracotomy (penetrating) – have OR staff and surgeon rapidly available – unable to make to the OR – clinically dead on arrival • signs of life in transit or within 5 minutes of arrival • deteriorating status and no obtainable blood pressure – survival 33% if above true Treatment Cardiac Injury • Incisions – unstable patient • injury on left/midline • injury on right • difficult exposure = = = left thoracotomy right thoracotomy bilateral (“clamshell”) – stable • anterior injury = median sternotomy • Cardiac arrest/hypotension – clamp thoracic aorta • thoracic aorta = 60% of cardiac output • improve coronary/cerebral blood flow Anterior Injury classic approach “quick & easy” Used as an adjunct to modified approaches Treatment Cardiac Injury • Cardiac wounds – controlled with finger or foley – atrial control with clamp (Satinsky) – suture wound • • • • atrial 3-0 prolene ventricle 2-0 silk/prolene pledgetted horizontal mattress beneath near major coronary avoid unnecessarily wide/multiple sutures near coronary Special Cardiac Injuries • Coronary artery – LAD most commonly injured – Ligation of small coronary vessels – Proximal coronary injury • ligation if no cardiac dysfunction • primary/bypass if cardiac dysfunction/arrhythmia • Interventricular defects (3-4%, delay repair) • Valves (delay repair) • Ventricular aneurysms (left ventricle) Intrathoracic Esophageal Injury • Incidence – infrequent (major centers 1-2/yr) • too deep for SW • rapidly fatal from cardiac/aortic injury – 3/200 ED thoracotomies (Washington et al, Ann Thorac Surg, 1985) • High morbidity/mortality if missed/delayed – Mediastinitis – Timing of definitive repair • 0-12 hours: 5-25% mortality • 12-24 hours: 10-44% mortality • > 24 hours: 25-66% mortality Penetrating Esophageal Injury • Diagnosis – PE (not sensitive or specific) • Bloody emesis • SQ air isolated to neck • Hamman’s sign – CXR • mediastinal emphysema • pleural effusion – CT scan • localized fluid collection /air Esophagography • Performed in all patients with suspicion • Gastrograffin vs barium • False negative exams – Gastrograffin = up 50% – Barium = < 25% Esophageal Leak Delayed diagnosis of leak found by chest tube EGD • Suspicion and negative esophagogram • Flexible vs rigid – Flexible easier technique – Flexible may miss upper esophageal injuries – ? Concern over esophageal dilation with flexible Indication for EGD Flowers et al, J Trauma, 1996 EGD Sensitivity Esophageal Injury Treatment • • • • NPO/NGT Nutrition Antibiotics Treatment – – – – amount of time between injury and diagnosis amount of local inflammation location of injury preexisting pathology Operative Repair - Esophagus • General dictums – – – – – – debride back to healthy tissue mucosal injury longer than muscular injury interrupted absorbable suture inner and outer buttressedwith adjacent viable tissue drainage of chest/mediastium drainage of stomach – insertion of JT Esophageal Injury • Complications – Sepsis – Fistulas • neck - usually heal 2-3 weeks • chest - sepsis and death if uncontrolled • trachea – dx by esophagogram – close or bypass as soon as diagnosed – Strictures – Chyle leak Penetrating Great Vessel Injury • Incidence – 108/30,000 admissions (Detroit, 1980-1990) – Arrival to hospital = temporarily occluded bleeding site – 48 successful repairs (Symgas and Sehdeva, Ann Surg, 1970) • • • • 14 fistulous communication with the heart 9 innominate vein 8 pulmonary vessel 17 intrapericardial aorta or small wound to the lower descending aorta Penetrating Great Vessel Injury • Diagnosis –H&P • type of weapon • trajectory • pulse exam – CXR • hemothorax/PTX • widening of the mediastium • pleural cap Penetrating Great Vessel Injury • Diagnosis – CT scan • False negative 5% • Findings – hematomas adjacent to vessel – pseudoaneurysm – irregularity of vessel – Arteriogram • “Gold Standard” Penetrating Great Vessel Injury • Treatment – Unstable - ED thoracotomy – Stable • most treated with thoracostomy tube/fluid • 9% require thoracotomy • Indications – > 1500 to 2000 cc with 12-24 hrs with bleeding – blood loss 200-300 cc/hr for 4-5 hrs and CXR with persistent effusion despite proper positioned CT ED Thoracotomy Only with Penetrating ! Time is of the essence classic steps… in sequence !! Penetrating Mediastinal Tracheal Injury • Incisions – anterior lateral thoracotomy • severe shock – posterior lateral thoracotomy • excellent exposure to hemithorax – median sternotomy +/- extension (neck/chest) • thoracic inlet • innominate artery • proximal carotid/subclavian arteries – bilateral “clamshell” Posterolateral Standard thoracic incision 5th intercostal space “up & around the scapula” Rarely done in major trauma Right Subclavian Also can be extended along the clavicle Remember: proximal & distal control ! Left Subclavian “flap incision” “trapdoor” difficult, timely, associated morbidity Mediastinal Tracheal Injury • Incidence – Rare • Bertelsen and Howitz, Thorax, 1972 – 9/1,178 – only 5/9 involved intrathoracic trachea • Kelly et al, Ann Thoracic Surg, 1985 – 100 penetrating tracheal injuries – 13/100 involved intrathoracic trachea – mortality • neck = 14% • thorax = 54% Indications for OR Back et al, J Trauama, 1997 Traditional Transmediastinal Work-up Cost of Mediastinal Work-up Grossman et al, J Trauma, 1998 Challenges to Traditional Dogma • Role of echocardiography – Is TTE as good as TEE? – Can it be used with confidence to rule out cardiac and aortic injury? • Liberal use of CT scan for trajectory – Is it appropriate to use CT scan to eliminate further tests and procedures? • Role of EGD – Is esophagogram the only test needed to rule out esophageal injury? The Cardiac Box: Penetrating Trauma any questions ?