Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
USING THE IMMUNOSTIMULANTS AS A FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENT IN CONTROLING THE VIRUS DISEASES ON THE SHRIMP AQUACULTURE IN INDONESIA*1 1) Alexander Rantetondok Department of Fisheries Faculty of Marine Science and Fisheries, Hasanuddin University, Makassar Indonesia Fax: 0411-586025; E-mail: alexander_ tondok@yahoo.com ABCTRACT Shrimp is the main exporting product from fishery sector of Indonesia. In 1991, Indonesia is the second rank producer of shrimp next to Chinese by total production more than 660.000 metric tons. Since 1993, however the production of shrimp have been decreasing, dramatically. To control disease,especially bacterial disease,currently has been used many kinds of antibiotic such as chloramfenicole,amphisiline, gentamisine, neosine, tetrasicline, penicilline G. on others. Nevertheless ,in the reality many of antibiotic are referred [as] generate strain new bacterium that resistant’s is not effective in battling the disease. Nowadays, prevention and disease controling become main priority in maintaining continuity of shrimp culture industry. Immunology of shrimp is a key element in determining strategy for disease control at shrimp culture. The usage of immunostimulants for example β-glucant and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) can improve nonspesifik immune response because it can improve phagocytoses activity from cellular defence, that have : effect on bactericidal activity. Using the immunostimulants in the shrimp culture for control the disease is a friendly environment because materials of the immunostimulants easy to reduse in the environments. Keywords: Immunostimulants, enviroments, antibiotic, bactericidal Foot Note: Field Study option: Aquaculture (Budidaya Perikanan) Introduction Shrimp is the main exporting product from fishery sector of Indonesia. In 1991, Indonesia is the second rank producer of shrimp next to Chinese by total production more than 660.000 metric ton (Anonymus, 1991 in Prayitno,1997). This succeeded is a short period because there is a failure of shrimp culture since 1989. The biggest failure of shrimp culture was occurred in 1993,where the production of shrimp downwardness till reaches 100.000 metric ton ( Anonymus,2002). According to Dahuri (2001), production of shrimp Indonesia in 1998 only around 167.550 metric ton, so the percentage of increase/year from 1994-1998 only 5.56%. In 2000 Indonesian shrimp productions was only 97.710 metric ton. (Anonymus,2002). In comparison with production in 1991, there was a degradation production account for 14,80%. The main cause of shrimp failure culture was disease virus outbreaks and conducting culture management that unfavorable and ecological potency degradation, as a consequence decreasing of shrimp resistance to diseases. Loss that generated by shrimp disease reaches 300 billion rupiahs per year for all ponds area in Indonesia (Rukyani and Sunarto,1998). Hawever, grace on the encourage of fish farmers and the applied of Shrimp Culture Health Management the production of shrimp by brackish-water ponds have been increased from 242,500 ton in 2004 to 300,000 ton in 2005 (Putro, 2005). In 2008 the production of acuaculture include shrimp increase up to 1690,000 tons, just the fourth rank after China with the total production of 32736,000 tons ( Dahuri, 2011). Based on the observation on the shrimp export data from 2000 to 2004,(Table 1) both the export volume and value (price in US, dollar) have been fluctuated due to fluctuation of the price ( export vulue tendency decrease ). Tabel 1. Indonesian Shrimp Export Year Volume (ton) Value (Million US $) 2000 114,035.1 1003.26 2001 127,344.3 940.1 2002 122,050.0 840.35 2003 134,241.6 852.72 2004 127,846.3 823.96 (Source: Indonesian Statistic, 2004) If we observe the shrimp export from Indonesia to US from January to August 2006 it is indicated that the volume of shrimp export is smaller than of Thailand and China. From January to September 2006 the volume of shrimp export from Indonesia to Japan is smaller than Vietnam (Kompas, 6 Novem ber. 2006). Acording to the Kompas News (N0v. 2006), the volume of shrimp export from Thailand to US (Jan. to August 2006) was 120,872 ton; from China to US was 49,446 ton from Indonesia to US was 43,655 ton and from Vietnam to US was 22,954 ton. From January .to September, 2006, the volume of shrimp export from Vietnam to Japan was 32,364 ton; from Indonesia to Japan was 29,004 ton; from Thailand to Japan was 17,531 ton and from China to Japan was 10,663 ton. In 2006 the target of shrimp production of Indonesia was 350,000 ton. To get this target the government of Indonesia introduced the new species Vannamei (Litopenaeus vannamei) from Hawai (US). This new species was cultured in both tradisional and semi intensive brackish-water ponds to increase the shrimp production that decrease due to the diseases outbreaks. Actually Litopenaeus vannamei is not resistance against the virus the same as tiger shrimp P. monodon (endogenous species). Recently, Myo Necrosis Virus has been reported to cause mortalities L.vannamei reared in brackish-water ponds in Situbondo (East Java) and others palce in Indonesia. Therefore, the research on the genetical engineering to produce the brootstock that resistance to disease is needed, especially to improve the genetic of the endogenous species tiger shrimp P. monodon. To control disease,especially bacterial disease, currently has been used some kinds of antibiotic such as chloramfenicole,amphisiline,gentamisine, neosine,tetrasicline,penicilline G. Nevertheless ,in the reality many of antibiotic are referred [as] generate strain new bacterium that resistant’s is not effective in battling the disease. According to Rosily (1987), there are about 200 new strains from bacterium Vibrio that resistant to more than two antibiotics. In consequence, it’s required to look for new methods in effort for disease problem. One of way to control disease is by increasing immune system of shrimp. Nowadays, prevention and disease control become main priority in maintaining continuity of shrimp culture industry. Immunology of shrimp is a key element in determining strategy for disease control at shrimp culture. In consequence, direct research at development come [from] (experiment) to evaluate and monitor impenetrability level shrimp must be conducted (Bacheré, 2000). According to Secombes (1994), the usage of immunostimulant for example β-glucant and lipopolysaccaride (LPS) can improve nonspesifik immune response because it can improve phagocytoses activity from cellular defence, that have : effect on bactericidal activity. Research on using β-glucant and lipopolysaccaride as a immunostimulant for disease prevention in tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon Fabricius) have been conducted inat in door tank and out door (brackish-water ponds). The results of this research indicated that both immunostimulants can enhance the immune response of shrimp to prevent the outbreaks of disease especially the White Syndrome Baculovirus or White Spot Syndrome Virus (Table 2) Rantetondok, 2002). This immunostimulant suggest as a friendly environment due to the materials used will preven the disease and do not destroy the enviromnts. The materials contens of the immunostimulants easy to reduce so that the immunostimulants do not contaminate the shrimp . Nowadays, prevention and disease control become main priority in maintaining continuity of shrimp culture industry. Immunology of shrimp is a key element in determining strategy for disease control at shrimp culture. In consequence, direct research at development come [from] (experiment) to evaluate and monitor impenetrability level shrimp must be conducted (Bacheré, 2000). Tabel 2. The Avarage of Survival Rate (%) Post Larvae of Tiger Shrimp Using Imunostimulant β-glucant and LPS after challenged test of White Spot Baculovirus or White Spot Syndrome Virus during 96 hours Treatments Average Duncan Range Test Glucant 5 g/kg feed 9.670 A LPS 30 g/kg feed 6.840 BA LPS 20 g/kg feed 6.630 BA Glucant 10 g/kg feed 6.170 BA Glucant 15 g/kg feed 4.340 BA Control 0.710 B LPS 10 g/kg feed 0.710 B Explanation: Treatment with average shown by Duncan test with the same character not significantly difference . Immunostimulants β-glucant can increase the survival rate and immune response in tiger shrimp P. monodon cultured in fiber glass tanks (Rantetondok,2000). Research on β-glucant and LPS as a immunostimulant for control disesae in tiger shrimp indicated that these immunostimulants can increase the survival rate and the resistance against White Syndrome Baculovirus or White Spot which one of a very dangerous disease in brackish water ponds (tambak) in Indonesia (Rantetondok, 2002). The research on the effect of two immunostumulants that is β-glucant and lipopolysaccaride (LPS) on respiratory burst conducted by the authors indicated that there was the strong relationship between respiratory burst and survival rate of the tiger shrimp. Dose LPS 30 g/kg feed showed the highest both in activity of respiratory burst and survival rate of the tiger shrimp when fed in net enclosured during the juvenile growing (called “Pembantutan”)n brackish-water ponds. Immune response can be seen in the increase of the respiratory activity of cell of the shrimp (Rantetondok, et al, 2004). The method of shrimp (invertebrate) to develop the immune-system called ProPO System as shown in Fig. 1 (Modified by Alday-Zanz, 1965). Hemocyte Release the proPO when in contact with foreign material ProPo System activated by: Fungi Bacteria (β-3,glucans) Gram negative (LPS) Gram positive (Peptidoglycans) Phenoloxidase PHENOL QUINONES MELANIN Fig. 1.Scheme ProPo System (Alday-Zanz, 1995) Immunostimulant Agents One of the methods to encrease the non-spesific defence of animal in aquaculture is to apply immunostimulants such as β-glucant and lipopolysaccaride (LPS. This is the of one the best methods to prevent the disease in aquaculture system (Scombes, 1994). Nowdays some of antibiotics have been used to preven the bacterial disease such as Furazolidone 12 ppm, Teramicyn 450 mg/kg body weight of shrimp added to feed, and Furanace 1,3 ppm that effective as bactericidal especially to control Vibriosis (Taren, 1985). In the other hand however, the residual of these antibiotics have a side effect to shrimp and humen due to the resintence of the phatogenic bacteria such as Vibrio to Chloramphenicol, Penicilin G. others. The recidue of the these antibiotics can stay in the body of shrimp 2 weeks after initial treatments, and these will be harmful for humen being as a consumer whose dirctly withought waiting for 2 weeks afer initial of treatments. These indicated that antibiotic can react as a theraupitic but it can be a lethal for shrimp because at the dose over the tolerant limit it can be destructed the potensial cell. Use of the antibiotic for long period an be resulted I in resistance of the bacteria to some of the antibiotics. Therefore using of immunostimulats is a good choice for control disease and it a friendly environments methods. β-glucans are branched β-1,3 and β-1,6 linked polyglucoses and are major structure polysaccharide in cell walls of most fungi yeast and mycelia fungi. High organism have depeloped various recognition mechanisms for these conservative fungal wall components. Β-gulcans are thuse able to stimulate non specific defence mechanism in animal as well as palnts. It is well estabiblished that β-glucans in mammals increase the resistance against microbial infections and stimulate anti-tumor mechanism. There is now a growing body of evidence that β-glucans also function as a immunostimulator in fish. They thus have a potential as a feed additives to counteract in immuosuppressive states of fish and as vaccine adjuvants (Robertsen et al. 1994). Fungi Mitake (Grifora frondosa) found ii Japan is branched and β-1,6 linked polyglucoses and it have a potential as immunostimulator to increase non-spesific defence mechanisms in humen (Ganjar, 1997). Futhermore it was decided that β-glucans can stimulate the immune system of the body such as macrophages, natural cell killer, T cell killer (cytotoxic), T cell helper, limfokine, interleukin-1, and interleukin-2 which can inbihibit the growth of cancer and virus. According to Tahir (1996) β-glucans have a important prospect as a immunostimulator. Tiger shrimp which is treated with β-glucans at concentration of 0.5-1 mg/ml (immersion treatmen) following the challenger test by bacteria V. vulnivicus at consentration of 5 x 104 CFU/ml for 12 hours indicated that there was an increasing in phenoloxidase activity of hemocyte 1 month after the initial treatments. P. javonicus, orally treatment by β-1,3 glucans (extracted from Schizophyllum commune) showed the increasing of fagocytic activity of hemocyte defence mechanisms against bacteria Vibrio sp (JICA, 1994). Trout immersed by chitosan or glucan for 30 minutes or injection for 1-3 h days before challenger test by bacteria Aeromonas salmonicida indicated the good defence mechanisms of this spesies. Injection administration (treatment) is better than the inmersion (Anderson,and Siwicki, 1994). β-glucans are major structural polysaccharides in cell walls of most yeast,filamentous fungi and mushrooms are also secreted as a slime or mucilage by some fungi (Rosenberger, 1976 in Robersten, 1994). From an evolutionary point of view, these structure probably represent one of the most ancient micronial cell wall components. Consequently, higher organism may have develop various recognism mechanism for these conserved fungal wall polysaccharide early in the evolution. This may be the reason why β-glucans have been found to stimulate or activate the non-spesipic defence mechanism in a wide range of higher organisms,plants (Darvill and Albersheim, 1984 in Robersten et al., 1994). Tiger shrimp treated by Chitin in different dose can increase the chitinase activity in the ingestion canal of the shrimp. Chitinase activity increase accordingly to the increasing of chitinase percentage in feed (Fox, 1993). Extract of abalone which are a glycoprotein component can increasing the fagositic activity and chemiluminesence of kidney leukocitye when intraperitonial injection to the rainbow trout at the dose of 20 mg/kg feed. This encreasing accur 5 days afre treatments and following bt the increasing of defence mechanism against V. anguillarium attact (Secombes, 1994). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are O-antigen and endotoxin in Gram-negative bacteria can increase the fagositic activity of leucocite in sea bream Pagrus major and limp macrophages in plate fish Pleuronectes platessa when in jection at dose of 500 μg for 5 days and showed the increasing of higher migration compare to the control (MacArthur et al., 1985). Futhermore, LPS also can stimulate directly the fagositic in culture medium. Bacterium cell, Vibrio sp killefd by 0.5% formaldehide and added in feed encapsulated can increase the survival rate in tiger shrimp larvae. It is assumed that the bacterium cell are a substance whuch can increase the defense mechanisms in shrimp larvae against the attact of bacteria in water (Itami, et al., 1991). LPS extracted from Cytophaga bacteria, and injection to turbotfish, Scophthalmus maximus than challenger tested by the same bacteria 21 days after initial injection can decrease the mortality 0-5 % lower than control of 90-100 % mortality. Fish vaccinated showed the higher haemoglutination titer compare to the control ( Al-Harbi and Austin, 1992). The result of the challenger test by the Vibrio spp against the tiger shrimp poslarvae (PL 20) treated for 96 hours by LPS extracted from E. coli showed the tendency of the more dereasing the mortality the more increasing the dose of LPS and the duration of treatment(Tahir,1996). They thus have a potential as feed additives to increase the phagositosis of bacteria so that it can increase defence mechanism against the micropatogen in the brackish-water ponds. Lysozyme Lysozyme is one of the indicators to decide the effectifness of the immunostimulants or immune response of the organism. According to Ellis (1990), lysozime has anti bacterium activity that caused lisis and can also personate opsonim. Specific substrat was found on lysozime is β-(1-4) “linked” with N-acetyl-D-Glikosamin, N-acetyl-asam muramil peptidoglucant that found at some wall cell of bacterium and if it was digested will cause plasma fall to pieceses caused by osmosis pressure. When that's lysozime at haemomocyte shrimp will have the character of anti bacterium that mean that immune system of shrimp has been activated. Thus giving β-glucant and LPS that functioned as [the] goals from recognition of protein form (Pattern Recognition Protein) can generate power of body defence shrimp pass by improvement lysozime. Besides direct influence as anti bacterium, lysozime is also reported can improve phagocytosis. Lysozyme found in serum or mucus of fish especially the tissue wich enreach in leucocyte such as kidney, gaster, and limp (Engstad, et al,1992). Tiger shrimp treated by β-glucant and LPS indicated the increasing of the lysozyme activity which can be seen in the high survival rate of the juvinel after perform the challenger test by Vibrio harveyi bacteria. (Fig. 2) (Rantetondok dkk, 2003) LPS 20 Figure 2. The average of lysozyme activity by the treatments Note : LPS 30 g/kg feed cannot be determinated The Methods of Immunostimulants Applied to Shrimp β-glucant : Immunostimulant was given to shrimp through mix with crumble feed with 3 doses each : 5 gr/kg feed, 10gr/kg feed and 15gr/kg feed . Feed amount that given is 10% from shrimp biomass weight per day and decreasing according to age of shrimp, at the end of research only 5% from shrimp biomass weight. Feed with immunostimulant was given only at first day once a week, and the observation of the effect immunostimulant was conducted at week 2, 4, 6, 8th. Shrimp sampling was conducted every week to weight shrimp biomass that will be a reference to count amount of given feed. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) : was given to shrimp through mix LPS with crumble feed with 3 doses each 10gr/kg feed, 20gr/kg feed and 30gr/kg feed. Immunostimulant giving method through shrimp feed is precisely the same with at B-glucant. Shrimp that has been stimulated its immune system by using both types of immunostimulant was challenged infected by pathogen bacterium Vibrio harveyi with dose 5 x 104 CFUs/ml through inverted for 96 hour. (Sung et al,1998). Challenger test was conducted at the end of culture period of larvae phase at week 2, 4, 6, 8th, from each set of experiment unit to calculate survival rate. The method to calculate survival rate was by undertake shrimp sampling account for 10 shrimps of each container of research basin. Hereinafter, shrimp was put into 21 units- 1 litre glass based on replicate and type of its immunostimulant. Shrimp prior to put into glass was given disinfectant KMnO4 4 ppms for 1 hour. The water that will be used to challenge test was sterilized with ultra violet ray. Hereinafter each unit of experiment glass was infected by V.harveyi bacterium with dose and time such as those which have been mentioned above. The methods of the immunostimulants applied to shrimp is useful to improve the oral administration because this is one of the best methos beside the others methods such injection,immersion, spraying and others. Nevertheless it is needed to improve the administration of immunostimulant applied to shrimp eg. using the microencapsulated feed for shrimp larvae and the ability of the shrimp to eat the such feed in culture medium ( brackish-water ponds or net enclosures for culture the post larvae). The develop of research on the applied of immunostimulants in the field is needed inconneting to pruduce the seed which specipic patogen resistant. On the other hands the research on the geneticall engineering to produce the seed which resistance to disease is also needed so that the production of the shrimp can be increased in Indonesia. References Alday-Zanz, V. 1995. Technical report. Short course on shrimp diseases and health management. Marine SAcience Education Project, Ujung Pandang 90 pp Anonymous. 1996. Kilas balik produksi udang tahun 1994. Asian Shrimp News. Asian Shrimp Culture Council,21:1-4 Anonymous. 2002.http/www foodmarketexchange. Com. Bachere`,E. 2000. Shrimp immunity and disease control. Aquaculture, 191:3-11 Dahuri,R. 2001. The application of agro industrial based on fisheries (in Indonesian). Paper Presented at the Seminar and National Congress on Food and Nutrition. Makassar. 16 pp. Dahuri, R. 2011. Pengembangan net working daalam pembangunan akuakultur sebagai solusi untuk krisis pangan, energy dan global warming. Paper dipresentasekan sebagai pembicara kunci pada Kongres Masyarakat Akuakultur Indonesia, Semarang 2-3 Desember 2011 Ellis, A.E. 1990. Lysosyme assays. Techniques in fish immunology (eds). SOS Publ, 43 DeNormandie Ave, Fair Haven. NJ. USA. Fish Immunology Technical Communication, 1: 101 – 103. Engstad, R.E, B. Robersten,. and E.Frifold. 1992. Yeast glucant induced increse in lysosyme and complement-mediated haemolytic activity in atlantic salmon blood. Fish and Shellfish Immunology. 2:287-297. Engstad, R.E, B. Robersten. 1994. Recognition of yeast cell wall glucan by atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L macrophages. Developmental and Comperative Immunology, 17:319-330. Fox, C. J. 1993. The effect of dietary chiti on the growth, survival rate and chitinase level in the digestive gland of juvenile P. monodon (Fab.). Aquaculture, 109:39-49. Ganjar, B. 1997. The alternatif of cancer terapy and other diseases (in Indonesian). One day Seminar, Multicare, Ujung Pandang, 25 pp Guiterrez, M.A., and Myazaky, T. 1994. Responses of japanese ell to oral challenge with Edwardsiella tarda after vaccination with formalin-killed cells of lipopolysaccharide 0f the bacterium. Jor. Aqua. Anim. Heal., 6:110-117. Itami, T., Tkahasi,Y., Yoneoka,K. And Yan Y. 1991. Survival of larval giant tiger prawn P. monodon after addition with killed Vibrio cells to a microencapsulated diet. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health, 3: 151-152. JICA GROUP. 1994. Training course in fish physiology and prevention of epizootics. Seminar on Fish Physiology and Prevention of Epizootics, Jakarta, 7 pp. Kompas, January 2006. Brackish-water ponds revitalization. 11,000,000 for 28,300 ha (in Indonesian). It is needed cost of Rp. --------, November, 2006. The Indonesian shrimp production gradually decrease (in Indonesian). MacArthur, J.I., Thomson, A.W. and Fletcher, T.C. 1985. Aspect of leucocyte migration on the plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L. J. of Fish Biology, 27: 667-676. Prayitno, S.B. 1997. Use of remedial bacterium for the accumulation of organic matter and ammonia in brackish-water ponds (in Indonsian). Proceeding of Seminar on National Biology XV, 767-771. Putro Sumpono. 2006. The strategy of shrimp export development (in Indonesian). Indonesian shrimp commission. Rantetondok, A. 2000. The effect of immunostimulants β-glucant on survival rate and immune response in tiger shrimp P. monodon (FAB.) under control environments. Proc. of the JSPS-DGHE Int. Symp. Sustainable Fisheries in Asia and the New Millenium, p.226-273. --------------------. 2002. The effect of immunostimulants β-glucant and lipopolysaccharide on immune response and survival rate in tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon Pabricius (in Indonesian). Ph. D. Disertation. Not Published. Post Graduate Programe, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, 146 pp. Rantetondok. A., Nessa, M.N., Muslimin, L., Tahir. A., and Hatta M . 2004. The effect of immunostimulats, β-glucant and lipopolysaccharide on immune response: Respiratory burst activity (anion superoxide detection) intracllulair in tiger shrimp (P. monodon Fabricius). Proceedings of the Fish Diseases and Shrimp Control Based on Immunization and Biosecurity. Seminar on Fish and Shrimp Diseases. Purwokerto, May 18-19, 2004. Rosyli,N.P. 1987. Drugs resistent Vibrio sp. associated with larvae of prawn Pennaeus indicus. Univ.Sci.Tech.Mar.Sci.Cochi.India. Rukyani, A, and A. Sunarto,. 1998. Non spesific pathogen resistant (Ns PR) Pennaeus monodon a complementary SPF broodstock development. Paper Presented in the Workshop on the Development of Pennaeus monodon Disease free Broodstock in Asian Countries, on 23-24 March 1998 at Bumi Wijaya Hotel. Jakarta. 15 pp. Secombes, C.J. 1994. Enhancement of fish phagocyte activity. Fish and Shellfish Immunology. 4: 421-436. Sung, H.J, Chang ; C.H. Her, J.C. Chang, and Y.L. Song. 1998. Phenoloxydase activity of hemocyte drived from Pennaeus monodon and Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Journal of Invertebrate Phatology, 71:26-33. Tahir, A. and C.J. Secombes. 1996. Modulation of dab (Limanda limanda, L) macrophage respiratory Immunology,6:135-147. burst activity. Fish and Shellfish Tareen, I.U. 1982. Control of diseases in the culture population of penaid shrimp, P. semisulcatus (de Haan). J. World Maricul. Soc. 13: 157-161