Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Basic Assessment Principles Chapter 2 Measurement Scales Nominal Ordinal Interval Ratio Norm-Referenced Instruments Individual’s score is compared to performance of others who have taken the same instrument (norming group) Example: personality inventory Evaluating the norming group size sampling representation Criterion-Referenced Instruments Individual’s performance is compared to specific criterion or standard Example: third-grade spelling test How are standards determined? common practice professional organizations or experts empirically-determined Norm-Referenced: Sample Scores Robert 72 Alice 82 Beth 94 Amy 77 Porter 62 Miles Paul John Kevin Ling 96 59 82 85 98 Jason 68 Whitney 79 Pedro 86 Jane 85 Kelly 92 Michael 81 Justin 72 Rebecca 88 Sherry 67 Maria 86 Frequency Distribution X f 50-59 60-69 1 3 70-79 4 80-89 90-100 8 4 Frequency Polygon 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-100 Histogram 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-100 Measures of Central Tendency Mode – most frequent score Median – evenly divides scores into two halves (50% of scores fall above, 50% fall below) Mean – arithmetic average of the scores X Formula: M N Measures of Central Tendency Example: Sample scores – 98, 98, 97, 50, 49 Mode = 98 Median = 97 Mean = 78.4 Measures of Variability Range – highest score minus lowest score Variance – sum of squared deviations from the mean Standard Deviation – square root of variance Formula: s X M N 2 Normal Distribution Skewed Distribution Types of Scores Raw scores Percentile scores/Percentile ranks Standard scores z scores T scores Stanines Age/grade-equivalent scores Percentiles X 50 60 70 80 90 f 1 3 4 9 4 % 5% 14% 19% 43% 19% %ile 5 19 38 81 99* Interpreting Percentiles 98th percentile 98% of the group had a score at or below this individual’s score 32nd percentile 32% of the group had a score at or below this individual’s score If there were 100 people taking the assessment, 32 of them would have a score at or below this individual’s score Interpreting Percentiles Units are not equal Useful for providing information about relative position in normative sample Not useful for indicating amount of difference between scores Types of Standard Scores z Scores z score = X-M s Mean = 0 Standard deviation = 1 T Scores Mean = 50 Standard deviation = 10 Stanines Standard Scores: Summary Additional Converted Scores Possible problematic scores Age-equivalent scores Grade-equivalent scores Problematic because: These scores do not reflect precise performance on an instrument Learning does not always occur in equal developmental levels Instruments vary in scoring Evaluating the Norming Group Adequacy of norming group depends on: Clients being assessed Purpose of the assessment How information will be used Examine methods used for selecting group Examine characteristics of norming group Sampling Methods Methods for selecting norming group: Simple random sample Stratified sample Cluster sample Norming Group Characteristics Size Gender Race/ethnicity Educational background Socioeconomic status Is the norming group appropriate for use with this client?