* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Original Contributions
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup
History of invasive and interventional cardiology wikipedia , lookup
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup
Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Heart arrhythmia wikipedia , lookup
Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
259 Original Contributions Central 3-Adrenergic Mechanisms May Modulate Ischemic Ventricular Fibrillation in Pigs Gerald W. Parker, Lloyd H. Michael, Craig J. Hartley, James E. Skinner, and Mark L. Entman Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 A central noradrenergic process may permit expression of the stress-related increase in cardiac vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation (VF). Thus, the effect of central j8-adrenergic receptor blockade with L-propranolol (0.01 and 0.05 mg/kg) on ischemia-induced VF vulnerability was evaluated in the psychologically stressed pig model and compared with Ringer's solution and D-propranolol (0.05 mg/kg). The ischemia of a maximum 15-minute left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion was used since we previously determined that pigs surviving 15 minutes usually do not fibrillate. Time to the onset of VF was analyzed by time-to-event analysis and ranged from 0.75 to 13.8 minutes in vulnerable pigs. Intracerebroventricular administration of L-propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) prolonged the time to VF compared with Ringer's solution and D-propranolol (p<0.05). The high dose of L-propranolol also reduced the incidence of VF (7/15 fibrillated) compared with Ringer's solution (12/12 fibrillated) and D-propranolol (6/7 fibrillated). The lower dose of L-propranolol was without effect on VF vulnerability (7/9 fibrillated). The plasma concentration resulting from central administration of 0.05 mg/kg L-propranolol was found to be 9.05+±3.25 ng/ml, which is significantly below therapeutic antiarrhythmic blood levels. We conclude that the reduced vulnerability to ischemia-induced VF after intracerebroventricular administration of propranolol is due to alteration of a central P-adrenergic receptor-mediated phenomenon as opposed to an effect on the heart directly or to nonspecific membrane stabilization. (Circulation Research 1990;66:259-270) V arious psychological risk factors have been related epidemiologically to cardiac rhythm disturbances in the presence and absence of coronary artery disease.1-6 These rhythm disturbances include ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (VF), the underlying mechanisms of sudden cardiac death. Although some of the psychological stressors are clearly related to acute phasic stress and imminent emotional distress accompanied by hemodynamic alterations consistent with autonomic imbalance, many are related to more tonic From the section of Cardiovascular Sciences (G.W.P., L.H.M., M.L.E., C.J.H.) and Division of Neurophysiology (J.E.S.), Departments of Medicine (G.W.P., L.H.M., M.L.E., C.J.H.), Physiology (G.W.P., L.H.M., M.L.E., JE.S.), and Neurology (J.E.S.), Baylor College of Medicine and the Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas. Supported by National Institutes of Health grants 1-PO1-HL31164-03 and 1-RO1-HL-23161-10. Address for reprints: Mark L. Entman, MD, Section of Cardiovascular Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030. Address for correspondence: Gerald W. Parker, Pathophysiology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21701. Received August 23, 1988; accepted July 24, 1989. psychosocial factors that are often imperceptible.1"5'7 Because the response may be temporally distant from the provocative event, causality of central nervous system-mediated arrhythmias associated with tonic psychosocial stress in humans is often difficult to discern. Our laboratory has developed a unique pig model of sudden cardiac death in which operationally defined tonic psychological stress is associated with the development of ischemia-induced VF. Specifically, lack of behavioral adaptation to the novel laboratory environment is associated with the development of VF in most cases within 15 minutes after occlusion of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Reduction of psychological stress by behavioral adaptation to the laboratory (learned adaptation), however, significantly reduces the vulnerability of the pig heart to ischemia-induced fibrillation.8 Furthermore, cryogenic blockade of a specific frontocortical brain stem pathway is also effective in preventing VF.9 Despite the increased vulnerability observed in the laboratory-unadapted pig, there were no overt signs of stress nor differences in basal heart rate in the unadapted compared with 260 Circulation Research Vol 66, No 2, February 1990 Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 the adapted state.10 Together, these studies indicate that specific cortical influences on the brain stem and autonomic nervous system modulate myocardial vulnerability to ischemia-induced VF evoked by tonic psychological stress associated with the novel laboratory environment. The cerebral neurochemical mechanisms mediating the increased myocardial vulnerability to psychological stress are unknown. Several neurophysiological studies have suggested a central catecholaminergic synaptic mechanism associated with the cerebral response to environmental stimuli. Central catecholaminergic mechanisms are associated with responses to new, noxious, or meaningful stimuli that invoke event-related slow potentials. The event-related slow potentials are characterized by slow membrane potential shifts caused by inactivation of a specific potassium current and are modulated by norepinephrine release and subsequent stimulation of cyclic AMP formation.1112 Additionally, other experiments have suggested a relation between ,3-adrenergic receptor stimulation and synaptic plasticity involved in neurophysiological models of learning.13 Because the concept of environmental stress implies cognition of meaningful stimuli, we hypothesized that central noradrenergic 13-receptormediated mechanisms contribute to the cerebral cortex's influence on autonomic regulation of the heart, which in turn mediates increased sensitivity to ischemia-induced VF. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate myocardial vulnerability to VF in the laboratoryunadapted psychologically stressed pig after central ,/-adrenergic receptor blockade. We demonstrate that administration of L-propranolol into the lateral cerebral ventricles exerts a specific potent effect on vulnerability to ischemic VF. Materials and Methods Experimental Animal Chronically instrumented, conscious Yorkshire-cross pigs (20-25 kg) were used for the study. The pig was selected for several reasons. First, since an individual's response to psychological stressors is a factor contributing to the etiology of sudden cardiac death, it was critical to select an animal model in which vulnerability is similarly modulated by a behavioral response to environmental stimuli. The pig represents an appropriate animal model since operationally defined psychological stressors are known to increase the vulnerability of the pig heart to arrhythmogenesis.81415 Second, since behavior is a variable in this study, which implies that interpretive responses to sensory stimuli need to be controlled, it was necessary to obtain experimental animals having a uniform psychosocial background and thus uniform behavioral response to the laboratory and personnel. Pigs were obtained from a single agricultural source located near our facility. The pigs were raised under identical conditions, transported to our lab in the same vehicle, and housed in the same environment during boarding and while in our laboratory. In addition, it was often possible to obtain littermates to serve as additional controls. A similar constancy of experimental animals is not easily obtained from other commonly used large animal models. These two factors, a constant psychosocial background and vulnerability to psychosocial stressors, made the pig an ideal model for the study. Surgical Preparation Pigs underwent aseptic brain cannula implantation to facilitate drug infusion as well as left lateral thoracotomy for implanting instrumentation. Anesthesia was induced with 15 mg/kg i.m. ketamine and 10 mg/kg i.v. methohexital. After tracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with methoxyflurane and oxygen. The pigs were ventilated with a tidal volume of 10-20 ml/kg and a respiratory rate of 10-15 breaths/min by use of an oxygen-flushed anesthetic machine and ventilator. Two 25-gauge stainless steel spinal needles cut to a length of 50 mm were implanted into the lateral cerebral ventricles of the brain. One needle was inserted into the left ventricle, and the second needle was placed in the right ventricle. The needles were implanted under stereotaxic control at a location 22.5 mm rostral to bregma. Each cannula was inserted to depth of 21.5 mm so that the tip was positioned in the anterior horn of the left and right lateral cerebral ventricle. The needles were permanently secured to the cranium by a cranial acrylic crown attached to the skull with stainless steel screws. Cannula placement in the cerebral ventricles was confirmed at autopsy by observing fluorescein dye in the cerebrospinal fluid, which had been injected into the cannula before death. Placement was also confirmed histologically. Thoracotomy in the fourth left intercostal space exposed the pericardium, which was then opened. The internal mammary artery was cannulated with polyethylene tubing (PE-100) to facilitate arterial blood gas analysis during surgery. One group of pigs was instrumented for measurement of various hemodynamic indexes; a second group assigned to the myocardial vulnerability protocol was instrumented further with a hydraulically activated ligatureoccluding device capable of effecting reversible myocardial ischemia at a later time in the conscious state.8 The occluder was positioned on the proximal LAD coronary artery 1 cm distal to its bifurcation with the circumflex coronary artery. A pulsed Doppler blood flow velocity probe was placed distal to the occluder. Doppler ultrasonic wall-thickening probes for evaluating regional myocardial function were sutured to the epicardial surface in the region to be rendered ischemic (anterior wall) as well as in the nonischemic region (posterior wall) of the left ventricle. A high fidelity pressure transducer (model P7, Konigsberg) was positioned in the chamber of the left ventricle via a stab incision in the apex in those pigs assigned to the hemodynamic protocol. Stainless steel wire electrodes were sutured through the skin on all four extremities for monitoring standard lead Parker et al Central f3-Adrenergic Modulation of Ischemic VF electrocardiograms. The distal end of the lead wires, catheter, and occluder were exteriorized caudal to the scapula and secured to the animal with a waterproof bandage. A chest tube was placed in the thoracic cavity before closing the thoracotomy and was removed postoperatively on evacuation of the pneumothorax. The animals were allowed 7-10 days postoperative recovery before beginning experimental manipulations. The animals were afebrile, eating well, and gaining weight by this time. Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 Behavioral Protocol The behavioral response to experimental handling of the pig is known to be a critical factor influencing myocardial vulnerability to ischemia-induced VF. Therefore, the psychological state of the animal was experimentally controlled by providing consistent care in handling of the animals. The pigs were transported from their home cage in the vivarium to the laboratory on a portable cart. Minimal restraint was effected by taping the legs together in an extended position. In the laboratory, the pigs were placed in right lateral recumbency in a specially designed study chamber. This exposure to the unfamiliar laboratory, in effect, constitutes a set of novel stimuli that is associated with increased vulnerability to ischemia-induced arrhythmias. Behavioral adaptation, however, occurs after 6-8 daily experiences in the laboratory, and VF no longer occurs during identical ischemic insults.8 Thus, evaluation of VF latency after central administration of propranolol in this study was conducted in the laboratory-unadapted state, when pigs are known to manifest VF within 15 minutes after LAD coronary artery occlusion. Experimental Protocol Hemodynamic alterations as a function of laboratory adaptation. Pigs were transported to the laboratory as described above on a daily basis for 8 days to assess hemodynamics as a function of laboratory adaptation. This was done to more fully evaluate hemodynamic status in this paradigm of tonic psychosocial stress in the pig. The Konigsberg pressure transducer, previously calibrated in vitro, measured left ventricular systolic and end-diastolic pressures. The first derivative of left ventricular pressure (dP/dt) was obtained by electronic differentiation. A triangular wave signal with known rate of change was used to provide direct calibration of the differentiator amplifier. A cardiotachometer triggered by the electrocardiogram provided instantaneous and continuous record of heart rate. LAD coronary artery blood flow velocity and regional myocardial wall thickening (left ventricular systolic thickening fraction) were recorded by their respective ultrasonic Doppler probes.16-18 The initial onset of the upstroke of left ventricular systolic pressure and peak negative dP/dt were used for timing the beginning and end of systole necessary for calculating systolic thickening fraction. To minimize recent phasic stress-induced hemodynamic alterations associated with moving the pig 261 from the vivarium to the laboratory, data were not collected for 30 minutes after arrival in the laboratory and attachment to the physiograph preamplifier patient cables. Heart rate, left ventricular systolic and end-diastolic pressure, maximum rate of left ventricular pressure development, left ventricular systolic wall thickening, and LAD coronary artery blood flow were continuously recorded on an eightchannel recorder (Gould, Cleveland, Ohio). The above indexes were measured three times at 10minute intervals while the pig was in a quiescent state. Once it was determined that significant differences did not exist among the three measurements (repeated analysis of variance, p=NS), the mean was used to represent baseline hemodynamic status on a given day in the laboratory. Effect of centrally administered propranolol on hemodynamics. These same pigs were then used to evaluate the effect of centrally administered Lpropranolol on the chronotropic and inotropic state of the heart. Once these baseline recordings had been obtained, either 0.01 mg/kg L-propranolol or Ringer's solution (vehicle control) was slowly infused into the lateral cerebral ventricles via the brain cannula. The volume administered was held constant (250-300 ,ll) among the pigs and was given by slow infusion over a 10-minute period. The presentation of drug treatment was alternated with respect to laboratory day exposure so that Ringer's solution was given on lab days 1, 3, 5, and 7 and L-propranolol was given on lab days 2, 4, 6, and 8. The data were initially analyzed for propranolol-induced changes with respect to the number of days of accrued laboratory adaptation. The number of daily experiences in the laboratory, however, was found not to be a factor in the observed hemodynamic alterations. Thus, the values from all the days within each drug treatment were pooled. A separate set of pigs was similarly instrumented and studied with a higher dose of L-propranolol (0.05 mg/kg i.c.v.) and the dextrorotatory isomer, D-propranolol (0.05 mg/kg i.c.v.). VF latency determinations. Initial handling of the pigs and data collection were performed in an identical manner as described above. Once baseline hemodynamic indexes were recorded, pigs were given either 0.01 or 0.05 mg/kg L-propranolol, 0.05 mg/kg D-propranolol, or Ringer's solution (vehicle control) infused slowly into the lateral cerebral ventricles over a 10-minute period. LAD coronary artery occlusion was effected 10 minutes after completion of the drug infusion. Completeness of coronary occlusion was verified by the LAD blood flow velocity signal, electrocardiographically, and by observing paradoxical left ventricular systolic wall thinning in the ischemic region.19 The time to the development of VF (VF latency) of a maximum 15-minute coronary artery occlusion was determined. A maximum 15-minute occlusion was selected because earlier studies demonstrated that VF will occur within 14 minutes after complete occlusion of the LAD coronary artery in unadapted pigs.8 Furthermore, adapted pigs not sus- 262 Circulation Research Vol 66, No 2, February 1990 Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 ceptible to VF remained so for at least 24 hours.8 Thus a 15-minute occlusion provided sensitivity for detecting antifibrillatory efficacy while minimizing the occurrence of occlusion/reperfusion-associated myocardial damage. If VF occurred, the occlusion was released, and the animal was electroconverted (200-250 Wsec extrathoracic shock) while unconscious. Reperfusion was also instituted if fibrillation did not occur after 15 minutes of ischemia. Some pigs were additionally used in a within-subject control protocol. These pigs were used on a subsequent occlusion trial only if recovery from occlusion/ reperfusion-induced regional myocardial dysfunction could be prospectively documented by the ischemic zone wall-thickening data and if animals were free of electrocardiographic abnormalities. Gross, histochemical (triphenyl tetrazolium chloride stain), and histological examinations of the hearts were also performed to confirm the prospective characterization of these pigs. In the within-subject experimental design, presentation of drug treatment was randomized with respect to laboratory day exposure or occlusion trial. Pharmacokinetics of centrally administered propranolol. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma levels of propranolol were determined at 5 and 10 minutes after intracerebral ventricular administration of 0.05 mg/kg Lpropranolol in a separate group of pigs. The samples were obtained under anesthesia (ketamine, sodium methohexital, and methoxyflurane) to facilitate cerebrospinal fluid collection at a site distant from drug infusion. Otherwise, infusion of L-propranolol into the right and left lateral cerebral ventricles was performed in an identical manner as previously described for VF latency determinations and hemodynamic evaluation. Cerebrospinal fluid samples were obtained at the level of the cisterna magna with a 20-gauge, 4-inch spinal needle. Blood was simultaneously collected from a femoral venous catheter. Intravenous infusion of 0.05 mg/kg L-propranolol via a lateral ear vein was also performed in three pigs to allow comparison of cerebroventricular versus intravenous administration. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid samples were stored at -70° C until analyzed. Propranolol concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.20 Statistical Analysis The time to the onset of VF subsequent to LAD coronary artery occlusion (VF latency) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier time-to-event or survival-curve analysis followed by Gehan's test of significance.21 Hemodynamic indexes within each treatment group and for laboratory adaptation were analyzed by repeatedmeasure analysis of variance. When an overall treatment effect was detected, between-group analysis of either percent change or absolute change from baseline was used to isolate specific drug effects at individual time points (analysis of variance followed by the Bonferroni multiple-comparison t test). The latter was preceded by evaluating the homogeneity of baseline values between the four treatment groups (analysis of variance).22 Data are expressed as mean±+SD. Results VF Latency Determination The latency to the onset of VF subsequent to complete occlusion of the LAD coronary artery in the psychologically unadapted pig was determined after intracerebroventricular administration of 0.05 and 0.01 mg/kg L-propranolol, 0.05 mg/kg D-propranolol, and Ringer's solution. Survival curve analysis revealed that L-propranolol at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg was an effective pharmacological intervention in prolonging the time to the development of VF as well as reducing the incidence of VF after acute occlusion of the LAD coronary artery (Figure 1). Ischemia-induced VF occurred in all 12 occlusion trials in the Ringer's solution treatment group with VXF latencies ranging from 0.75 to 12.5 minutes. L-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg i.c.v.), however, prolonged the time to VF compared with Ringer's solution (p<0.01) and D-propranolol (p<0.05). The incidence of ischemia-induced VF was also reduced to 47% (7/15 fibrillated) compared with Ringer's solution (12/12 fibrillated) and D-propranolol (6/7 fibrillated). VF latencies in the vulnerable pigs ranged from 1.5 to 13.8 minutes. There were no significant differences between the lower dose Lpropranolol (7/9 fibrillated) and D-propranolol (6/7 fibrillated) treatment groups compared with the Ringer's group. A within-subject experimental design was also used to minimize between-subject variability.23 LPropranolol (0.05 mg/kg i.c.v.) prolonged the time to the onset of VF compared with Ringer's solution and D-propranolol in all cases (Figure 2). VF latencies after randomized presentation of L-propranolol and Ringer's solution were 12.72±1.42 and 6.18+1.42 minutes, respectively (p =0.016; one-tail paired t test). A similar randomized presentation of L-propranolol and D-propranolol resulted in VF latencies of 9.75+3.21 and 7.29±2.43 minutes (p=0.0432). In these nine pigs in which experimental presentation of drug treatment was randomized with respect to laboratory day exposure, only four (44%) developed VF subsequent to LAD coronary artery occlusion after central administration of 0.05 mg/kg L-propranolol. Ischemia-induced VF occurred in all nine of those same pigs after central administration of either Dpropranolol or Ringer's solution. Hemodynamic Effect of Centrally Administered Propranolol Hemodynamics were also evaluated at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes after intracerebroventricular administration of 0.05 and 0.01 mg/kg L-propranolol, 0.05 mg/kg D-propranolol, and Ringer's solution (vehicle control) in a separate group of pigs. Data for each treatment are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 3 and indicate the following: 1) Baseline heart rate, left ventricular systolic pressure, maximum left ventricu- Parker et al Central f3-Adrenergic Modulation of Ischemic VF 263 FIGURE 1. Graph showing latency to the onset of 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 LL. 0 z 0 -' .0 0 CL ventricularfibrillation (VF) subsequent to complete occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery in the psychologically stressed pig. Pigs were given either Ringer's solution (vehicle control), 0.05 mg/kg D-propranolol (d-P on figure), or 0.05 mg/kg and 0.01 mg/kg L-propranolol (I-P on figure) infused slowly into the lateral intracerebral ventricles 10 minutes before coronary artery occlusion. VF 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 TIME (min) lar dP/dt and dP/dt per developed pressure, and left ventricular systolic wall thickening were similar between the four treatment groups (p=NS by analysis of variance). 2) L-Propranolol (0.05 and 0.01 mg/ kg) induced a moderate decrease in heart rate, maximum left ventricular dP/dt, and maximum left ventricular dP/dt per developed pressure (p<0.0005 by repeated-measure analysis of variance). The peak heart rate decrease after 0.05 mg/kg i.c.v. Lpropranolol was 27 beats/min and after 0.01 mg/kg i.c.v. L-propranolol was 13 beats/min. The maximum decrease in left ventricular dP/dt after 0.05 and 0.01 mg/kg i.c.v. L-propranolol was 19% and 16%, respec- latencies for the treatment groups were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis in which estimated probabilities for not developing VF (ordinate) are plotted against time (abscissa). VF occurred in all 12 occlusion trials in the Ringer's treatment group and in six out of seven occlusion trials in D-propranolol-treated pigs. VF latencies ranged from 0. 75 to 12.5 minutes. L-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg), however, prolonged the time to VT compared with both Ringer's solution ( p <0. 01) and D-propranolol ( p<O.OS). The incidence of VT was reduced to 47% (7/15 fibrillated) in the 0.05 mg/kg L-propranolol-treated pigs. The lower dose of Lpropranolol and D-propranolol were not significantly different from Ringer's solution. *p <0.05 compared with Ringer's solution or D-propranolol. tively. Maximum left ventricular dP/dt per developed left ventricular systolic pressure achieved a maximum decline from baseline of 16% and 13%. The above hemodynamic effects were observed as early as 5 minutes after completion of drug infusion, but peak responses were not achieved until 15-25 minutes in individual animals. Between-group analysis of either absolute change or percent change from baseline at individual time points revealed a dose-dependent L-propranolol effect on heart rate but not on maximum left ventricular dP/dt or dP/dt per developed pressure (Figure 3). 3) L-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) was associated with a slight reduction in systolic wall FIGURE 2. Bar chart showing ventricular fibrillation (VF) latency in the psychologically stressed pig subsequent to complete occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (within-subject experimental design). Pigs were given either 0.05 mg/kg L-propranolol (1-prop on figure), 0. 05 mg/kg Dpropranolol (d-prop on figure), or Ringer's solution infused slowly into the lateral intracerebral ventricles 10 minutes before coronary artery occlusion. Each bar represents the VF latency of an individual pig. Successive experiments in the same pig are connected by a common baseline. Drug treatments were randomized with respect to laboratory day exposure and paired within each animal. In these nine pigs, only four (44%) given L-propranolol developed VF 5 0 M I-prop (o.OS mg/Kg) 10 VF LATENCY (min) C Cl 15 CDZ d-prop (0.05n to left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion. Ischemia-induced VF occurred in all nine of these same pigs when given either Dpropranolol or Ringer's solution. 20 subsequent e99) --, 264 Circulation Research Vol 66, No 2, Februaty 1990 Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 TABLE 1. Hemodynamic Response After Intracerebroventricular Administration of L-Propranolol, D-Propranolol, and Ringer's Solution After drug administration n Baseline 5 min 10 min 15 min 20 min 30 min p Heart rate (beats/min) L-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) 14 142.6±10.6 123.2±7.9 121.4±7.4 118.9±6.6 113.4+6.5 115.7±9.4 <0.0005 L-Propranolol (0.01 mg/kg) 16 130.1±19.6 124.3±23.5 120.6±20.3 118.9+19.3 116.7±18.3 117.2±18.7 <0.0005 D-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) 8 129.8±16.3 128.8±15.7 128.2+12.8 129.4+16.3 128.4±16.7 127.2±15.5 NS Ringer's solution 14 131.3±17.9 132.2±22.9 129.4±18.0 126.4+19.8 129.4±18.0 132.6±20.2 NS LVSP (mm Hg) L-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) 9 112.1±8.17 107.1±6.9 107.8+7.4 107.5+6.2 108.1±5.5 109.2+4.8 NS L-Propranolol (0.01 mg/kg) 16 103.2±5.6 100.8+7.1 101.2±7.9 101.5+7.2 101.9+7.9 102.9+6.8 NS D-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) 5 107.6±2.7 109.5±5.6 108.4±1.6 110.2±3.3 109.3±5.9 110.8±3.1 NS Ringer's solution 14 102.1+5.7 101.2±8.7 101.2+7.1 102.6±7.9 102.8+7.9 105.0±8.8 NS LVEDP (mm Hg) L-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) 9 5.9+3.8 7.0+3.8 7.4±3.6 7.6+3.6 8.0±4.5 7.0±3.5 NS L-Propranolol (0.01 mg/kg) 16 8.0±3.4 8.9+4.0 9.9±4.5 9.4+4.2 9.2+3.1 9.9±3.5 NS D-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) 5 4.6+3.7 5.3+5.6 4.8+3.6 6.4±3.5 6.7+4.8 5.8+1.8 NS Ringer's solution 14 8.2+3.3 8.9+4.8 8.1+4.1 8.7+4.5 8.8+4.2 9.5+5.1 NS LV+dP/dt L-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) 9 3,551±575 2,967+301 2,999±528 2,861+397 <0.0005 2,903+469 2,835+421 L-Propranolol (0.01 mg/kg) 16 3,518+522 3,024+502 2,947+546 3,072+446 2,946+474 2,995-+547 <0.0005 D-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) 5 2,916±250 2,972±215 2,962+222 3,070+251 NS 2,961+209 2,921+199 Ringer's solution 14 3,479±553 3,392+534 3,346±542 3,423±459 3,571+580 NS 3,426+440 LV+dP/dt/P L-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) 9 33.3+3.7 29.6±2.9 29.8+4.1 28.9±3.7 28.1+3.7 28.0+3.2 <0.0005 L-Propranolol (0.01 mg/kg) 16 36.8±4.4 33.4+4.1 33.1+2.4 31.9±4.6 31.7±3.9 32.0+4.5 <0.0005 D-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) 5 30.9+2.3 31.0+2.5 31.1±2.4 32.2±3.3 31.4+2.5 30.2+3.2 NS Ringer's solution 14 36.9+3.9 36.7+3.8 35.8±4.1 36.4±3.2 36.5+2.9 37.2+4.3 NS LV systolic TF (%) L-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) 7 28.6+9.4 26.1+6.6 25.9±7.0 27.3+7.5 27.0±7.7 27.0±7.7 <0.05 L-Propranolol (0.01 mg/kg) 13 26.7±9.9 25.8+9.1 25.5±9.8 25.9+9.7 25.8±10.1 25.7±10.5 NS D-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) 5 33.1±8.2 32.3±7.7 32.4+7.7 32.5±8.4 31.7+7.8 31.5±7.5 NS Ringer's solution 11 29.1±8.9 29.8±9.9 28.6±8.5 29.4±9.1 29.0+9.3 29.0±9.4 NS Values are mean±SD. Values of p are by repeated-measure analysis of variance. LVSP, left ventricular systolic pressure; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; LV+dP/dt, maximum left ventricular dP/dt; LV+dP/dt/P, LV+dP/dt per developed left ventricular pressure; LV systolic TF, left ventricular systolic wall thickening fraction; NS, not significant. thickening (p<0.05), but statistical significance was only marginal. Furthermore, analysis of percent change from baseline between the four treatment groups at individual time points did not reveal a significant between-group effect. 4) Left ventricular systolic and end-diastolic pressures were not significantly affected by any of the four treatment regimens (p=NS). 5) DPropranolol and Ringer's solution after intracerebral infusion were not associated with significant alterations in the measured hemodynamic indexes. Heart Rate Response to LAD Coronary Artery Occlusion Baseline heart rate in the quiescent state was similar in the L-propranolol (0.05 mg/kg and 0.01 mg/kg), D-propranolol, and Ringer's solution treatment groups (Table 2; p=NS by analysis of variance). Although heart rate can fluctuate markedly after LAD coronary artery occlusion in the conscious pig, the general trend evoked by ischemia consisted of a biphasic heart rate response in most pigs. Heart rate increased in the early phase of ischemia (0-4 minutes) in all cases and in all treatment groups; this increase was followed by a later decline in those individual pigs with VF latencies greater than 4 minutes. The highest heart rate (peak) reached during the first 4 minutes of ischemia was lower in the 0.05 mg/kg L-propranolol group compared with the Ringer's group (Table 2; p<O.05). However, there was no difference in peak heart rate in the 0.05 mg/kg L-propranolol compared with both the Dpropranolol and low-dose L-propranolol treatment groups, despite differences in VF vulnerability (Table 2; p=NS). Likewise, the heart rate measured at the last period of sinus rhythm before VF (or at 15 minutes) was also moderately depressed in pigs receiving 0.05 mg/kg L-propranolol compared with pigs receiving Ringer's solution (p<0.05; Table 2) but not compared with the other two groups (p=NS; Table 2). Since heart rate may be a determinant of the Parker et al Central f3-Adrenergic Modulation of Ischemic VF 265 10 WI ,:::z-,1, \ -, t- 'IA-1 1 1 -100 - T T T 0 .L I 0 E -20 1 U) 0 0 0 0 -30 1 0* FIGURE 3. Graphs showing heart rate and maximum left ventricular dPI dt (MAX LV dP/dt) after cerebroventricular administration of 0.05 mg/kg L-propranolol (I-prop on figure), 0.01 mg/kg L-propranolol, 0.05 mg/kg Dpropranolol (dprop on figure), and Ringer's solution (vehicle control). Heart rate is expressed as absolute change from baseline in beats/min; MAX LV dP/dt is expressed as percent change from baseline. Values represent mean ±+SEM. *p<O.01 compared with Ringer's solution. **p<O.01 compared with the lower dose of L-propranolol. -40 I -50 Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 20 10 a10 ~-J fi o C 01 -10 0 0 c 0 -20 -30 -40 -50 0 *-* I-prp.05 30 20 TIME (min) 10 I-oPop.01 0-0 A - -A lbw 40 A-A dprop TABLE 2. Heart Rate After Intracerebroventricular Administration of L-Propranolol, D-Propranolol, Ringer's Solution, and Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Occlusion HR after drug administration Treatment n L-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) L-Propranolol (0.01 mg/kg) D-Propranolol (0.05 mg/kg) Ringer's solution 15 7 7 12 Baseline HR (beats/min) 1 2 3 143±15 140±14 140±14 145±14 141±14 145±15 136±14 134±18 132±14 137±20 137±19 132±20 (beats/min) 1 min 120±15 136±16 129±18 131±17 5 min 115±16 131±15 128±16 128±18 10 min 112±17 128±15 127±15 128±19 HR after LAD occlusion (beats/min) Phase 1 Phase 2 145±19* 130±18* 162±26 144±15 160±22 138±23 164±30 177±27 0.870t F value 4.25: 5.23t 2.14t 2.71t 1.83t 0.626t 0.706t Values are mean±SD. HR, heart rate; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; phase 1, peak HR during early phase of ischemia (0-4 minutes); phase 2, stable HR within 1 minute of the onset of ventricular fibrillation or reperfusion. Three baseline measurements were made before drug infusion. Resting HR is given for 1, 5, and 10 minutes after drug infusion and before ischemia. F values are by one-way analysis of variance. *p<0.01 compared with Ringer's solution by t test with Bonferroni correction. tp=NS for the four treatment groups. tp<O.Ol for the four treatment groups. 266 Circulation Research Vol 66, No 2, February 1990 250 r * O A A A A 200 F A A 0 I-: I- 0 A * A o 150 h AA U 11 I: ~~~~0 n 100 r = -0.29 0 6 3 9 VF LATENCY (min) 250 Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 200 _A A A LLi ,: A A 0 150 _ I-c LI 100 F 0 * 50 L- d-P (0.05mg/kg) Ringers A A W I-P (0.05mg/kg) I-P (0.01mg/kg) 0 0~~~~~~~~ 0 FIGURE 4. Graphs showing relation between heart rate and ventricular fibrillation (VF) latency after administration of L-propranolol (l-P), D-propranolol (d-P), and Ringer's solution. Top panel: Relation between peak heart rate in the first 4 minutes of 12 15 ischemia (ordinate) and VF latency (abscissa). Data from all treatment groups were pooled and analyzed by Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient; however, individual data points from respective * I-P (0.05mg/kg) o l-P (0.01mg/kg) treatment groups can be visualized as indicated in A d-P (0.05mg/kg) A Ringers the figure legend. There was no correlation between peak heart rate and VT latency (r= -0.29; p>0.05). Bottom panel: Relation between sinus rhythm heart rate nearest the onset of VF or at 15 minutes (ordinate) and VF latency (abscissa). A relatively weak correlaA tion was observed (r= -0.566; p<O0.05). A A A 0 r = -0.57 50 0 3 6 9 12 15 VF LATENCY (min) propensity to develop VF, the relation between peak heart rate and VF latency from all the pigs was analyzed. A correlation between VF latency and peak heart rate in the first 4 minutes of ischemia was not observed (r= -0.296, p>O.05; Figure 4, top panel). A relatively weak correlation, however, was observed between VF latency and heart rate nearest the onset of VF (r=-0.566, p<O.05; Figure 4, bottom panel). Although heart rate may be one mechanism contributing to the differences observed in VF vulnerability, the data suggest that other factors are involved. Hemodynamics as a Function of Laboratoty Adaptation Heart rate, left ventricular systolic and enddiastolic pressure, maximum rate of left ventricular pressure development, left ventricular systolic wall thickening, and coronary artery blood flow were evaluated on a daily basis for 8 days (Figure 5). The initial transport of the pig from the vivarium to the laboratory is accompanied by acute hemodynamic alterations. This acute phasic stress variable was minimized by allowing 30 minutes to elapse before beginning data collection. Significant differences were not observed (repeated-measurement analysis of variance) in the above hemodynamic indexes dur- ing psychological adaptation to the unfamiliar environment. The lack of overt hemodynamic alterations in the unadapted compared with the adapted pig occurred despite the known increased myocardial vulnerability to ischemia-induced VE associated with initial exposure to a novel laboratory environment.8 Propranolol Pharmacokinetics Cerebrospinal fluid and blood plasma analysis of L-propranolol levels after intracerebral administration of 0.05 mg/kg propranolol revealed concentrations of 1,201-5,991 ng/ml propranolol in the cerebrospinal fluid as opposed to 4.9-13.7 ng/ml propranolol in the plasma 10 minutes after completion of drug infusion (Table 3). Intravenous administration of the same dose of L-propranolol, on the other hand, produced cerebrospinal fluid levels of only 1.2-1.4 ng/ml, while 6.7-62.5 and 2-15.4 ng/ml were detected in the plasma at 5 and 10 minutes, respectively (Table 4). Discussion Ventricular tachycardia degenerating into VF is the most consistently observed mechanism of sudden cardiac death.4,24 Although myocardial ischemia and infarction are known contributing factors in predisposing to VF, not all persons with ischemic heart Parker et al Central 1-Adrenergic Modulation of Ischemic VF 170 12 150 10 8 L;R Ic 130 g C) 0 - 0 z 6 W 1- C 110 W 1- T A- .0 I - A- A& j1 4 1 1 0 90 . 2 I 70 U 130 30 110 20 3 m Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 V) 0I 3 J EE I- X ~0 10 90 TIl%.. T ..0 .1 1 70 l 100 v 4000 80 . K,-, 10.0 0) m > -JI FIGURE 5. Graphs showing heart rate, left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery blood flow, left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), maximum left ventricular dP/dt (MAXLVdP/dt), and left ventricular (LV) systolic thickening fraction (%TF) as a function of laboratory adaptation in the conscious pig. Values represent mean+±SEM. 0 5000 0 267 1 60 -< ) :Eg 3000 -.1~ x.EE 2000 `- ,Lvvv I. 20 Z z z C) 1 000 1 2 3 4 5 0 6 7 8 LAB DAY disease or infarction die unexpectedly. Furthermore, acute pathological lesions of the coronary arteries and myocardium are not observed or are inadequate to account for the fatal event in 10-15% of the cases.25 Thus, although ischemia is a major factor triggering VF, other factors in addition to diffuse coronary artery disease may mediate increased vulnerability in susceptible individuals. This study provides further evidence in an animal model that central nervous system input is one such TABLE 3. Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Propranolol Concentrations After Intracerebroventricular Administration of 0.05 mg/kg L-Propranolol in the Pig Cerebrospinal fluid (ng/ml) Plasma (ng/ml) Pig 41 41A 44 45 49 50 5 min 6.4 16.7 12.7 7.5 16.8 11.2 10 min 4.9 13.7 8.4 6.1 10.9 10.3 S min 10 min ... ... 3,365.6 3,054.9 5,160.0 25,572.0 2,933.9 1,490.2 1,201.4 2,100.0 5,991.0 2,533.5 268 Circulation Research Vol 66, No 2, February 1990 TABLE 4. Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Propranolol Concentrations After Intravenous Administration of 0.05 mg/kg LPropranolol in the Pig Pig 42 44 45 5 min 62.5 6.7 56.9 Plasma Cerebrospinal fluid (ng/ml) (ng/ml) 10 min 13.4 2.0 15.4 5 min ... 1.7 1.5 10 min ... 1.4 1.2 Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 factor capable of influencing myocardial vulnerability. As has been shown previously, all pigs exposed to a novel laboratory environment develop VF within 14 minutes after the onset of ischemia. Pretreatment with direct intracerebral administration of L-propranolol, however, significantly prolonged the time to the onset of VF as well as reduced the incidence of ischemic VF from 100% to 47%. The dextrorotatory isomer that has less than 1% of the potency of the levorotatory isomer in antagonizing ,8-adrenergic receptors, however, failed to reduce the environmental stress-related vulnerability to ischemia-induced VF. Thus, the major finding of this study is that a central f3-adrenergic receptor-mediated phenomenon appears to be involved in modulation of myocardial vulnerability to environmental stressrelated arrhythmogenesis. Since propranolol distribution into the blood compartment was expected to occur after intracerebroventricular administration, plasma and cerebrospinal fluid levels of the drug were determined to firmly establish the relative site of action (central vs. peripheral). Direct administration of 0.05 mg/kg Lpropranolol into the lateral cerebral ventricles did result in measurable blood levels at 5 and 10 minutes after drug infusion. Plasma concentrations of propranolol that are associated with therapeutic effects are known to vary widely (20-1,000 ng/ml), particularly with reference to suppression of arrhythmic activity. Intravenous infusion of 10 mg racemic propranolol (1 mg/min) suppressed spontaneous ventricular ectopy in eight out of 12 patients, whereas, D-propranolol was without effect. Plasma levels associated with ectopy suppression following intravenous administration were in the range of 40-85 ng/ml.26 This level is comparable with plasma concentrations required to cause considerable cardiac ,B-adrenergic receptor antagonism as evidenced by a 40-80% inhibition of exercise-induced tachycardia.27 However, concentrations ranging from 100-800 ng/ml are sometimes necessary to control ventricular arrhythmias in humans.28 Thus, the measured plasma concentration of 9+3.2 ng/ml observed after intracerebroventricular injection should be below therapeutic antiarrhythmic blood levels. Cerebrospinal fluid levels, on the other hand, were on the order of 200300 -fold higher. Five minutes after the completion of drug infusion, plasma concentration for intravenous administration of L-propranolol was four times higher than for intracerebral administration; at 10 minutes, the plasma concentration was similar for intravenous and intracerebral propranolol. This further suggests that a plasma concentration in the 10 ng/ml range would not be associated with an antifibrillatory effect due to myocardial receptor antagonism since previously used intravenous doses of 0.2 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg racemic propranolol (4-40 times the dose as used in the present study), which would be associated with even higher plasma levels, were not effective in preventing VF in this same pig model.8 Moreover, propranolol was specifically evaluated for potential antifibrillatory efficacy in the pig, and a plasma level of 600 ng/ml was without effect in reducing the occurrence of VF after LAD coronary occlusion.29 Baseline hemodynamic and cardiac function before occlusion is also not expected to influence or be predictive of increased myocardial vulnerability to VF in this model since no significant changes were observed in the measured indexes of cardiac inotropy and chronotropy during an 8-day laboratory adaptation protocol. This observation extends a previous finding that resting heart rates were similar in laboratory-unadapted compared with laboratoryadapted pigs despite their known difference in vulnerability to ischemia-induced VF.10 The lack of hemodynamic alterations and overt signs of stress associated with exposure to a novel environment confirm the utility of this paradigm in modeling the influence of the often imperceptible tonic psychosocial stress associated with life-change events on myocardial vulnerability in man.1'5,7 It also points out the need to recognize psychological variables, whether in animals or man, when evaluating antiarrhythmic efficacy. Decreased vulnerability to ischemia-induced VF after central administration of propranolol, however, is associated with moderate hemodynamic alterations. Both doses of L-propranolol resulted in a moderate, but a significant, decrease in heart rate and maximum left ventricular dP/dt but no effect on left ventricular systolic pressure and end-diastolic pressure. There were no significant hemodynamic alterations after central administration of D-propranolol and Ringer's solution. After induction of ischemia, peak heart rate in the first 4 minutes of ischemia and the stable heart rate nearest the onset of VF were moderately depressed in the high-dose L-propranolol-treated pigs compared with pigs receiving Ringer's solution. However, both peak heart rate and heart rate nearest the onset of fibrillation were not different in pigs receiving 0.05 mg/kg L-propranolol, 0.01 mg/kg L-propranolol, and D-propranolol despite differences in VF vulnerability. Furthermore, there was no correlation between VF latency and peak heart rate in the early phase of ischemia and only a relatively weak correlation near the onset of VF. The hemodynamic and heart rate data, therefore, do not identify a specific physiological parameter that predicts antifibrillatory action. Studies in other species have also reported a negative chronotropic effect as well as a decrease in mean arterial blood pressure after administration of pro- Parker et al Central ,-Adrenergic Modulation of Ischemic VF Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 pranolol into the cerebroventricular system.30-32 Reduction of sympathetic nervous system activity33 and a decrease in plasma norepinephrine concentration34 accompany the physiological response after cerebroventricular injection of propranolol. Thus, there is no doubt that centrally administered propranolol alters autonomic tone and stimulation of the heart by reducing (in all likelihood) sympathetic outflow. Several studies have demonstrated a reduction in the incidence of ischemia-induced lethal ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial 8-adrenergic blockade; however, there are conflicting reports. Peripheral myocardial ,B-adrenergic receptor antagonism achieved by the intravenous administration of /-blockers afforded protection against VF during coronary artery occlusion in the dog.35 Furthermore, 0.2 mg/kg i.v. propranolol significantly reduced the incidence of ischemia-induced VF with experimentally induced sympathetic hyperactivity in cats36; the cardioselective ,B-blocker tolamolol (4 mg/kg i.v.), resulted in a 50% reduction in the repetitive extrasystole VF threshold in a psychologically stressed dog model.37 In contrast, peripheral administration of 0.2 and 2 mg/kg i.v. racemic propranolol in the psychologically stressed pig was ineffective in providing protection against acute ischemia-induced VE8 The present study demonstrates in the same pig model that central administration of 0.05 mg/kg L-propranolol provides a salutary antifibrillatory effect. The reason for the disparity of results in the pig compared with other models concerning cardiac /3-adrenergic receptor blockade is only speculative. However, it is known that the pig is intrinsically sensitive to environmental stressors.14,38,39 It may be that vulnerability to the deleterious effects of environmental stress modulates the observed differences. If so, this vulnerability is likely shared by the pig and at least some patients. The rationale for the present study stemmed from observations that various operationally defined stressor events (novel stimulus, unexpected cutaneous shock, and physical restraint) all appear to evoke a cortical noradrenergic ,/-receptor process of which the electrochemical correlates are known. These same stressor events also increase the susceptibility to lethal arrhythmias in pigs. The present study demonstrates that antagonism of cerebral /3-adrenergic receptors reduces the susceptibility to environmental stressrelated VF. The data suggesting that this is a centrally mediated /3-adrenergic effect are 1) isomeric specificity of propranolol effect, 2) pharmacokinetic data demonstrating negligible peripheral propranolol levels with central administration, and 3) inability of peripheral (intravenous) administration to alter vulnerability to ischemic VF. References 1. Rahe RH, Bennet L, Romo M, Seltanen P, Arthur RS: Subject's recent life changes and coronary heart disease in Finland. Am J Psychiatry 1973;130:1222-1226 2. Reich P, De Silva RA, Lown B, Murawski J: Acute psychological disturbances preceding life-threatening arrhythmias. JAMA 1981;246:233-235 269 3. Wolf S: Psychosocial forces in myocardial infarction and sudden death. Circulation 1969;39/40(suppl IV):IV-74-IV-81 4. Cobb LA, Baum RS, Alvarez H, Schaffer WA: Resuscitation from out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: 4 year follow up. Circulation 1975;52(suppl III):III-223-III-235 5. Parks CM, Benjamin G, Fitzgerald RG: Broken heart: A statistical study of increased mortality among widowers. Br Med J 1969;1:740-743 6. Engel GL: Psychologic factors in instantaneous cardiac death. N Engl J Med 1976;294:664-665 7. Holme I, Helgeland A, Hjerman I, Leren P, Lund-Larsen PG: Four year mortality by some socioeconomic indicators: The Oslo Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1980;34:48 8. Skinner JE, Lie JT, Entman ML: Modification of ventricular fibrillation latency following coronary artery occlusion in the conscious pig: The effects of psychological stress and betaadrenergic blockade. Circulation 1975;51:656-667 9. Skinner JE, Reed JC: Blockade of a frontocortical-brainstem pathway prevents ventricular fibrillation of the ischemic heart in pigs. Am J Physiol 1981;240:H-156-H-163 10. Skinner JE, Beder SJ, Entman ML: Psychological stress activates phosphorylase in the heart of the conscious pig without increasing heart rate or blood pressure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1983;80:4513-4517 11. Skinner JE, Reed JC, Welch KMA, Nell JH: Cutaneous shock produces correlated shifts in slow potential amplitude and cyclic 3',5'-adenosine monophosphate level in the parietal cortex of the conscious rat. J Neurochem 1978;30:699-704 12. Skinner JE, Molnar M: Event-related extracellular potassium ion activity changes in the frontal cortex of the conscious cat. J Neurophysiol 1983;49:204-215 13. Grey C, Freeman WJ, Skinner JE: Chemical dependencies of learning in the rabbit olfactory bulb: Acquisition of the transient spatial pattern change depends on norepinephrine. Behav Neurosci 1986;100:585-596 14. Johansson G, Jonsson L, Lannek N, Blomgren L, Linberg P, Poupa 0: Severe stress cardiomyopathy in pigs. Am Heart J 1974;87:451-457 15. Johansson G, Olsson K, Haggendal J, Jonsson L, HorenTolling K: Effect of amygdalectomy on stress-induced myocardial necrosis and blood levels of catecholamines in pigs. Acta Physiol Scand 1981;113:553-555 16. Hartley CJ, Cole JS: An ultrasonic pulsed doppler system for measuring blood flow in small vessels. J Appl Physiol 1974; 27:626-629 17. Hartley CJ, Latson LA, Michael LH, Seidel CL, Entman ML, Lewis RM: Doppler measurement of myocardial thickening with a single epicardial transducer. Am J Physiol 1983; 245:H-1066-H-1072 18. Zhu W, Myers ML, Hartley CJ, Roberts R, Bolli R: Validation of a single crystal for measurement of transmural and epicardial thickening. Am J Physiol 1986;251:H-1045-H-1055 19. Vatner SF: Correlation between acute reductions in myocardial blood flow and function in conscious dogs. Circ Res 1980;47:201-207 20. Taburet AM, Taylor AA, Mitchell JR, Rollins DE, Pool JL: Plasma concentrations of propranolol and 4-hydroxypropranolol in man measured by high pressure liquid chromatography. Life Sci 1979;24:209-217 21. Brown BW, Hollande M: Statistics: A Biomedical Introduction. New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1977, pp 341-359 22. Wallenstein S, Zucher CL, Fleis JL: Some statistical methods useful in circulation research. Circ Res 1980;47:1-9 23. Michelson EL, Davies JL, Naito M, Kaplinski E, Dreifus LS: Importance of the spontaneous variability of ventricular fibrillation following acute coronary ligation to arrhythmia drug therapy (abstract). Circulation 1981;64(suppl IV):IV-273 24. Cobb LA, Werner JA, Trobaugh CB: Sudden cardiac death: A decade's experience with out-of-hospital resuscitation. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis 1980;49:31-36 25. Schwartz CJ, Gerritz RG: Anatomical pathology of unexpected cardiac death. Circulation 1975;52:18-26 270 Circulation Research Vol 66, No 2, February 1990 Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 26. Coltart DJ, Gibson DG, Shand DG: Plasma propranolol levels associated with suppression of ventricular ectopic beats. Br Med J 1971;1:490-491 27. Coltart DJ, Shand DG: Plasma propranolol levels in the quantitative assessment of /8-adrenergic blockade in man. Br Med J 1970;3:731-734 28. Woosley RL, Shand D, Kornhauser D, Smith R, Reele S, Higgins SB, Nies AS, Shand DG, Oates JA: Suppression of chronic ventricular arrhythmias with propranolol. Circulation 1979;60:819-827 29. Muller CA, Opie LH, Hamm CW, Peisach M, Gihwala D: Prevention of ventricular fibrillation by metrolol in a pig model of acute myocardial ischemia: Absence of a major arrhythmogenic role for cyclic AMP. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1986; 18:375-387 30. Reid JL, Lewis PJ, Myers MG, Dollery CT: Cardiovascular effects of intracerebroventricular D-, L-, and DL-propranolol in the conscious rabbit. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1974;188:394- 399 31. Day MD, Roach AG: Central alpha and beta-adrenoceptors modifying arterial blood pressure and heart rate in the conscious cat. Br J Pharmacol 1974;51:325- 333 32. Tackett RL, Webb JG, Privitera PJ: Cerebroventricular propranolol elevates cerebrospinal fluid norepinephrine and lowers blood pressure. Science 1981;213:911-913 33. Lewis PJ, Haeusler G: Reduction in sympathetic nervous activity as a mechanism for the hypotensive action of propranolol. Nature 1975;256:440 34. Privitera PJ, Webb JG, Walle T: Effect of centrally administered propranolol on plasma renin activity, plasma norepinephrine, and arterial pressure. Eur J Pharmacol 1979; 54:51-60 35. Khan MI, Hamilton JT, Manning GW: Protective effect of beta adrenergic blockade in experimental coronary artery occlusion in conscious dogs. Am J Cardiol 1972;30:832-837 36. Schwartz PJ, Vanoli E, Zaza A, Zuanetti G: The effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on life-threatening arrhythmias induced by the interaction between acute myocardial ischemia and sympathetic hyperactivity. Am Heart J 1985;109:937-948 37. Matta RJ, Lawler JE, Lown B: Ventricular electrical instability in the conscious dog: Effects of psychological stress and beta-adrenergic blockade. Am J Cardiol 1976;38:594-598 38. Bergmann V: Changes of cardiac and skeletal muscle in pigs following transport stress. Exp Pathol 1979;17:243-248 39. Nelson TE, Jones EW, Henrickson RL, Falk SN, Kerr MS: Porcine malignant hyperthermia: Observations on the occurrence of pale, soft, exudative musculature among susceptible pigs. Am J Vet Res 1974;35:347-350 KEY WORDS * propranolol * ventricular fibrillation * pigs psychological stress Central beta-adrenergic mechanisms may modulate ischemic ventricular fibrillation in pigs. G W Parker, L H Michael, C J Hartley, J E Skinner and M L Entman Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 Circ Res. 1990;66:259-270 doi: 10.1161/01.RES.66.2.259 Circulation Research is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231 Copyright © 1990 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0009-7330. Online ISSN: 1524-4571 The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://circres.ahajournals.org/content/66/2/259 Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published in Circulation Research can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office. Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located, click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about this process is available in the Permissions and Rights Question and Answer document. Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at: http://www.lww.com/reprints Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to Circulation Research is online at: http://circres.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/