Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
AMER. ZOOL., 39:783-795 (1999) Evolutionary Conservation in Retinoid Signalling and Metabolism1 BARBARA R. BECKETT AND MARTIN PETKOVICH 2 * Cancer Research Labs, Botterell Hall, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada •Tel: 613 545 6791, Fax 6830—to whom correspondence should be addressed SYNOPSIS. In accord with the notion that retinoid signalling is of central importance in vertebrate evolution, a number of its components are evolutionarily conserved. Retinoid X nuclear receptors (RXRs), which interact directly with a number of signalling pathways, are highly conserved among mammals, Xenopus, and chick. We have studied RXRs in zebrafish and find that they are also very well conserved with respect to amino acid sequence and function, compared to mammalian RXRs. However, zebrafish has additional subtypes (RXRS and RXRe) which are altered in structure and function. New information which has come to light since these were first described suggests ways in which these unique subtypes could fine-tune retinoid signalling in zebrafish. We have performed phylogenetic analysis with the zebrafish RXRs and RXRs from other species to try to understand the evolutionary relationships among them. In addition, we have found a retinoic acid (RA)-inducible, RA-metabolizing cytochrome P450 (P450RAI/CYP26) which is evolutionarily conserved among vertebrates and has an important role in controlling retinoid signalling by regulating the level of biologically available RA. INTRODUCTION The retinoid signalling system Retinoid signalling involves a complex system of interacting proteins and small molecules which play critical roles in the development of a diverse range of organisms. The components of this system include two families of nuclear receptors, interacting nuclear proteins which modulate the transcriptional activity of the receptors, a number of high affinity cellular retinoid binding proteins, an array of naturally occurring ligands, and enzymes which synthesize and metabolize these ligands. We discuss the evolutionary conservation of two of these components that we have studied in zebrafish (Danio rerid), the retinoid X receptors and cytochrome P450RAI (CYP26), and their possible roles in retinoic acid signalling. Biological effects of vitamin A Vitamin A (retinol) is essential for a number of biological processes, including ' From the Symposium Evolution of the Steroid/Thyroid/Retinoic Acid Receptors presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, 3-7 January 1998, at Boston, Massachusetts. 2 E-mail: petkovic@post.queensu.ca growth, vision, reproduction, hematopoiesis, immune function, and maintenance of epithelial tissues. Retinoic acid (RA), the principal active metabolite of vitamin A, affects the growth and differentiation of many different cultured mammalian cell lines in vitro and has been found to affect the expression of a wide variety of genes (see Gudas et al., 1994). RA also has spectacular effects on vertebrate development, influencing the establishment of the embryonic axes and morphogenesis of the nervous system and limbs (for review see Hofmann and Eichele, 1994). The effects of vitamin A have been observed in conditions of vitamin A excess and vitamin A deficiency (for references see Chambon, 1994). During embryonic development vitamin A deficiency results in congenital malformations of many structures including the eye, heart, and genito-urinary tract. Administration of teratogenic doses of RA during mammalian embryonic development results in craniofacial, cardiac, thymic, limb, and central nervous system malformations (Means and Gudas, 1995). Recently, RA has been found to be effective in the prevention and treatment of certain cancers (Hong et al, 1990; Meyskens and Manetta, 1995; Warrell, 1996). Clearly, it is of interest to understand at a 783 784 B. R. BECKETT AND MARTIN PETKOVICH molecular level the effects of a substance forming heterodimers with other nuclear rewhich has such wide-ranging and important ceptors (Leid et al, 1992; Mangelsdorf et effects on adult and developing organisms. al, 1992a). Unlike RARs, which bind both aU-trans and 9-cis RA, RXRs are selective Retinoic acid receptors for the 9-cis RA isomer. In vivo, the role of The discovery of nuclear receptors for 9-cis RA in the activation of RXRs has not retinoic acid was a crucial leap forward in been fully established, although synthetic our understanding of how RA affects gene retinoids with RXR selectivity appear to act transcription (Giguere et al, 1987; Petkov- through these receptors in vivo (Jones and ich et al, 1987). These RA receptors Petkovich, 1996; Lala et al, 1996). In ad(RAR) are members of the large steroid/ dition to its actions as a heterodimer partner thyroid receptor superfamily and are acti- for other nuclear receptors, RXR is also cavated by the binding of RA. There are three pable of homodimerization (Lala et al, forms of RARs; a, (3, and 7 subtypes, each 1996; Mangelsdorf et al, 1992a; Rottman of which has been found to have distinct et al, 1991; Zhang et al, \992b), although tissue distribution and developmental pat- the biological significance of this homoditerns of expression (Ang and Duester, 1997; merization is unclear (Leblanc and StunDolle et al, 1990; Mendelsohn et al., 1992; nenberg, 1995). The result of this promisRuberte et al, 1990, 1991, 1993). The a, cuity in its interactions with other nuclear (3, and 7 subtypes in turn consist of a num- receptors is that the RXR signalling pathber of isoforms generated by alternate splic- ways intersect with, and is able to influence, ing and promoter usage (Leid et al., 1993). many other signalling systems. Among The RARs are classified as type II nuclear these are vitamin D signalling (through inreceptors, along with retinoid X receptors teraction with VDR); thyroid hormone sig(RXRs, see below), vitamin D receptors nalling (through TR); adipogenesis, fatty (VDRs), thyroid receptors (TRs), peroxi- acid metabolism, and glucose homeostasis some proliferator-activated receptors (through PPAR; Mangelsdorf and Evans, (PPARs), and many orphan receptors for 1995; Mukherjee et al, 1997); growth facwhich ligands have not been identified tor signalling pathways (NGFI-B and (Mangelsdorf and Evans, 1995; Meier, NURR1; Perlmann and Jansson, 1995); and 1997). Type II receptors recognize a se- cholesterol homeostasis (LXR; Janowski et quence on the target DNA (response ele- al, 1996; Lehmann et al, 1997). Like ment) consisting of two half sites with the RARs, RXRs are also expressed in distinct consensus AG(G/T)TCA, arranged as direct tissue and developmental patterns (Manor inverted repeats separated by a variable gelsdorf et al., 1992a). but characteristic number of nucleotides (Naar et al, 1991; Umesono et al., 1991). Ligand Modulation in RA signalling: RA These receptors bind DNA in the absence Metabolism and P450RAI of ligand and form heterodimers with RXRs There is also diversity in naturally oc(Mangelsdorf and Evans, 1995). curring retinoids, ligands for retinoid receptors. Among those which have been idenRetinoid X receptors tified are ail-trans and 9-cis RA, 3,4-dideRXRs, first identified in 1990 (Mangels- hydroretinoic acid (Thaller and Eichele, dorf et al., 1990), are necessary for high- 1990); 14-hydroxy-refro-retinol and anhyefficiency DNA binding and transcriptional droretinol (Eppinger et al, 1993); 13,14-diactivation of a large number of nuclear re- dydroxy-retinol (Derguini et al, 1995); 4ceptors in the type II category (see above; oxoretinaldehyde (Blumberg et al, 1996); Bugge et al., 1992; Kliewer et al., 1992; 4-oxoretinol (Achkar et al, 1996); and 4Kliewer et al., 1992; Mangelsdorf and oxo-retinoic acid (Pijnappel et al, 1993). A Evans, 1995; Marks et al, 1992; Yu et al, large number of synthetic retinoids specific 1991; Zhang et al, 1992a). Like RARs, to RAR and RXR subtypes have been synthey exist in a number of different subtypes, thesized, and among these are compounds designated a, (3, and 7, each capable of whose function depends on the receptor RETINOID SIGNALLING AND METABOLISM context. For example, the synthetic retinoid LG100754 is an antagonist in the context of RXR/RXR homodimers, but it activates RXR/PPAR heterodimers ("mixed function retinoid"; Lala et al, 1996). Other synthetic retinoids can antagonize transactivation by RAR, but retain the ability to block the activity of the transcription factor API, characteristic of RA ("dissociating retinoids"; Chen et al, 1995). Naturally occurring retinoids may also prove discriminating. For example, 4-oxo-RA, although a weak agonist, may have selectivity for RAR3 (Pijnappel et al, 1993). The relevance of this selectivity in vivo is not clear at present and will ultimately depend on the intracellular concentrations of RA metabolites. The pathways responsible for synthesis and metabolism of RA and other naturally occurring retinoids have been the subject of investigation for many years. It is known that RA is synthesized from retinal and retinol precursors and that the process may involve cellular retinol-binding protein (CRBP) (Napoli, 1996). Some candidate enzymes have been identified (Ang and Duester, 1997), but the processes have not been well characterized at the molecular level. The oxidative pathways responsible for metabolizing RA have been well-characterized biochemically and are known to involve RA-inducible cytochrome P450 (Roberts et al., 1979a; Roberts et al, 1979b) and intermediates whic include 4OH-RA, 4-oxo-RA, 18-OH-RA, and possibly 5,6-epoxy RA (Fiorella and Napoli, 1994; Frolik et al, 1979; Kurlandsky et al., 1994). Recently a RA-inducible, developmentally-regulated cytochrome P450 (P450RAI or Cyp26) has been cloned and been shown to metabolize RA to 4-OH-RA, 4-oxo-RA, and other metabolites in vitro (Abu-Abed et al., 1998; Fujii et al., 1997; Ray et al., 1997; White et al., 1997; White et al., 1996). Its expression in mammalian cells (Stuart, Chithalen, White, Jones, and Petkovich, personal communication) and in developing mouse embryos (Fujii et al., 1997; B.B. and MR, unpublished data) suggests that P450RAI is responsible for RA metabolism occurring in RA target tissues. 785 Interacting proteins In addition to the complexity resulting from multiple receptors and multiple ligands, retinoid signalling is complicated by a number of other interactions which are shared with other nuclear receptors. The interaction between nuclear receptors and the transcriptional apparatus recently has been found to be mediated by adaptor proteins. These include co-activator and co-repressors and co-integrator proteins which serve as a platform for assembly of these positive and negative effectors (Glass et al., 1997; Korzus et al, 1998; Kurokawa et al, 1998; Shibata et al, 1997; see references in Wolffe, 1997). There is evidence that some coactivators and co-repressors may have tissue-specific expression or be developmentally regulated. In the case of ACTR and N-CoR this has been directly observed (Chen et al, 1997; Soderstrom et al, 1997). Tissue-specific expression of co-regulators has been inferred from the cell-dependent agonistic and antagonistic properties of the antiestrogen tamoxifen. The interactions between nuclear receptors and these modulatory proteins may be allosterically affected by both ligand and DNA sequence. In the case of retinoid receptors, different ligands induce distinct interactions with co-repressors (Lala et al, 1996), suggesting that specificity in the ligand-induced conformational changes that results in differences in the complement of interacting proteins. In addition, the nature and affinity of binding of co-repressors to receptors is influenced allosterically by the sequence of the DNA to which the receptor is bound (Kurokawa et al, 1995). On DR5 response elements, RAR/RXR heterodimers dissociate from the co-repressor N-CoR in response to ligand, whereas on DR1 elements this dissociation does not occur. In addition to these interacting nuclear proteins, there are high-affinity retinol(CRBP) and RA-binding proteins (CRABP) in the cytoplasm which are developmentally regulated (Ruberte et al, 1993) and may have some role in RA synthesis and/or metabolism (Napoli, 1996). However, their biological role is poorly understood; mice in which both CRABP forms have been de- 786 B. R. BECKETT AND MARTIN PETKOVICH leted by homologous recombination have an essentially normal phenotype (Lampron et al, 1995). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION H7 REGION OF LBD: 283 RXKS RXRE RXRa RXRy 309 PKESTHNLGVEAFFDRESSHSAEVGALFDRVLTEL HRNSAHSAGVGAIFDRESAHNAEVGAIFDRVLTEL HRSSAHSAGVGSIFDR VLTEL HRNSAHTAGVGAIFDR VLTEL Evolutionary conservation of zebrafish C-TERMINDS: RXRs 413 422 The preceding discussion gives some inFLMEMLESPH dication of the complexity of the retinoid RXR5 RXRE FLMEMLEAPHOLT signalling system with regard to receptors, RXRa FLMEMLEAPHOIT EiHEiaEAPHOIT ligands, and interacting proteins. RXRs RXRy play a unique role in linking several sig- FIG. 1. Amino acid sequence of zebrafish RXRs (see nalling pathways together, including that for Jones et al., 1995). The sequence from the regions RA. If RXRs in vivo are indeed activated where RXRS and/or RXRe differ significantly from of mammalian RXRs is shown: 1) the region of by 9-cis RA, as much of the in vitro data that the ligand binding domain (LBD) in conserved helical suggest, RA will play a central role in in- domain H7 (Bourguet et al., 1995) in which RXR8 and tegrating these pathways. RXRe have 14 additional amino acids, and 2) the CIn our lab we have cloned RXRs from terminus. The underlined region is the conserved AFzebrafish and we find that the subtypes are 2 core motif (Durand et al, 1994). somewhat different from those which have been cloned from other vertebrates. Unlike amino acid truncation at the C-terminus mammals which have three subtypes of compared to RXRe and the other zebrafish RXR (Leid et al, 1992; Mangelsdorf et al, and mammalian RXRs. The zebrafish 1992), zebrafish have at least 5 distinct sub- RXRs do not have an obvious correspontypes. These include the a and 7 subtypes dence with mammalian RXRs a, (3, or 7 which we have previously described and based on amino acid sequence, and the deswhich bind 9-cis RA and are transcription- ignation of zebrafish RXRa and RXR7 are ally active; the 8 and e subtypes which do based on affinity for 9-cis RA and their exnot bind 9-cis RA and are transcriptionally pression levels of expression in developing inactive; (Jones et al., 1995) and an addi- embryos (Jones et al., 1995) and regenertional subtype which has not been charac- ating caudal fin. The latter is shown in the terized (Jos Joore, personal communica- northern blot in Figure 2, which shows that tion). The 8 and e subtypes have a 14 amino (like mammalian RXRa) zebrafish RXRa acid insert in an alpha-helical region in the mRNA is abundantly expressed, whereas middle of the ligand-binding domain, in the RXR7 mRNA is expressed at much lower conserved alpha-helical region designated levels. H7 in X-ray crystallographic studies (Fig. In order to understand the phylogenetic 1; Bourguet et al., 1995). At the amino acid relationships among the zebrafish RXRs level this insert appears to be an approxi- and those which have been isolated from mate repeat of the preceding region. X-ray other species, we performed neighbor-joincrystallographic studies which have been ing analysis of the RXRs with the complete done on the ligand-binding domains of amino acid sequences of the receptors using RXRa and RAR7 show that while the H7 ClustalX and excluding gaps. Figure 3 helical domain in which the 14 amino acid shows the results of this analysis. Zebrafish insert of RXRS and RXRe is found, does RXR7 appears from the phylogenetic analnot actually form part of the ligand binding ysis to be more closely related to mammapocket, it is very close by, (Wurtz et al, lian RXRa while zebrafish RXRa and the 1996) and it would not be surprising if it uncharacterized zebrafish receptor designatresulted in a subtle change in the confor- ed only "RXR" in Figure 2, group with mation. This could explain the inability of mammalian RXR7 in this analysis (also in RXRs 8 and e to bind 9-cis RA in vitro. It parsimony analysis; V. Laudet, personal should also be noted that RXRS has a 3- communication). Note that the evolutionary 787 RETINOID SIGNALLING AND METABOLISM RXRa RXRy RXR5 RXRe N R N R N R NR 9 kb 6.5kb-v 3.4 kb 2.2 kb FIG. 2. Northern blot of zebrafish RXRs expressed in normal (N) and regenerating (5 days post-amputation; R) zebrafish caudal fin. Northern blots were done using 3 u.g of poly A+ RNA, using the Quik-Hyb (Stratagene) kit as previously described (Jones et al., 1995). Blots were exposed to Kodak X-Omat film for 24 hr. Expression of zebrafish RXRs was not upregulated in regenerating caudal fin, as in the zebrafish RARs (White et al., 1994) but in contrast to the RA-inducible, RA-metabolizing cytochrome P450RAI (White et al., 1996). ZRXR5 ZRXRY xRXRa / hRXRa /n686 hRXR0 zRXR 0.1 FIG. 3. Phylogeny of RXRs based on complete coding sequence, showing the relationship between zebrafish (z), mammalian (h, human), Xenopus (x) and chick (c) RXRs. The zebrafish RXR labelled only "RXR" has not been characterized (Jos Joore, personal communication). The tree was plotted using neighbor joining analysis and the ClustalX package, eliminating gaps. The bar represents 10% difference in sequence and the numbers represent bootstrap values. The Genbank accession numbers for the sequences are: hRXRa (S09592), hRXRfi (P28702), hRXR-y (P48443), xRXRp (P51128), xRXRp (S73269), xRXR-y (P51129), cRXRP (P28701). 788 B. R. BECKETT AND MARTIN PETKOVICH distance between the zebrafish receptors and mammalian RXR7 is much larger than between zebrafish RXR7 and mammalian RXRa. The non-ligand-binding receptors RXR8 and RXRe, although they share a similar 14 amino acid insert in the same location in the ligand binding domain, are actually quite distantly related to each other. They both group with the mammalian RXRp by this analysis and by parsimony analysis (V. Laudet, personal communication). Interestingly, it has been found in mapping studies of the zebrafish genome that RXRe and mammalian RXRp map in regions of the genome which appear to be syntenic (J. Postlethwaite, personal communication), giving credence to the idea that RXRe may be evolutionarily related to mammalian RXR(3. It has been proposed that the ancestral nuclear receptor did not have a ligand, and that ligand-binding nuclear receptors have evolved more recently (Escriva et al, 1997). Perhaps RXR8 and RXRe are "fossils" in the RXR family, representing an older, non-ligand binding form of the RXR. However, when neighbor joining analysis is performed using members of the USP family (the arthropod homolog of RXR) in addition to RXRs (Fig. 4), it is clear that the zebrafish "orphan" 8 and e receptors are no more closely related to the non-ligand binding USP family than are other RXRs. The organization of the introns and exons comprising a gene also give some indication of the evolutionary relatedness of genes. In the case of the mouse RXR7 and RXRa genes, the genomic structure has been found to differ significantly from most other nuclear receptors, for example RAR (Lehmann et al, 1991; van der Leede et al, 1992), androgen receptor (Lubahn et al., 1989), and estrogen receptor (Ponglikitmongkol et al., 1988), in two ways: 1) the intron within the DNA binding (C) domain is located within the first zinc finger, instead of between the two zinc fingers, and 2) there are five introns in the RXR genes instead of the usual four (Liu and Linney, 1993). Examination of a RXRS genomic clone reveals that the intron within the first zinc finger is conserved between zebrafish and mouse, suggesting that the appearance of RXRs 8 and e occurred after the divergence of the RXRs from other nuclear receptors. The fact that there are more RXR genes in zebrafish than in other vertebrates is consistent with what has been found in other gene families isolated from zebrafish. For example, there are more members of the homeodomain protein families Dll (distalless), Msx (muscle segment homeobox), and En (engrailed) in zebrafish than in mammals, and more Hox clusters (M. Ekker, personal communication). In addition, in mapping studies of the zebrafish genome, blocks of genes are found to be repeated (J. Postlethwaite, M. Ekker, etc., manuscript in preparation), indicative of an ancient genome duplication in zebrafish sometime after the divergence of the teleost and mammalian lines. Possible importance of zebrafish RXRS and RXRe Since RXRS and RXRe were cloned, Xray crystallographic studies (Bourguet et al., 1995; Renaud et al., 1995; Wurtz et al, 1996) have localized ligand binding pockets and other studies have indicated that there may be a more important role for the C-terminal domain of RXR in a heterodimer pair than was previously realized. In light of this new information, it becomes easier to appreciate that variant RXRs such as 8 and e may have an important biological role. For some time it was thought that as a member of a heterodimer pair, RXR was a "silent partner," with RXR allosterically blocked by its partner from interacting with its ligand and activation of the heterodimer pair occurring solely as a result of the partner's ligand (Forman et al, 1995; Leblanc and Stunnenberg, 1995). This has been shown very elegantly with direct assays of the binding of receptor-specific ligands and RAR/RXR heterodimers (Kurokawa et al, 1994). However it has been known for several years that under certain circumstances RXR can be an active partner in the RAR/ RXR heterodimer, for example in the presence of RXR ligand (Forman et al, 1995) or on certain retinoic acid responsive elements (RAREs) (Durand et al, 1994). Also 789 RETINOID SIGNALLING AND METABOLISM hRXRy cRXRoc. xRXRy. zRXRy hRXRa xRXRa zRXRa zRXRS V^xRXRp hRXRp mUSP bUSP dUSP FIG. 4. Phylogenies of RXRs and USPs (see Fig. 3 for details). The Genbank accession numbers for the USP sequences are: bUSP (Bombyx mori. P49700), mUSP {Manduca sexla, P54779), dUSP (Drosoplula, P20153). with certain heterodimer partners such as LXR, PPAR, and NGFI-B (Forman et al, 1995; Kliewer et al, 1992; Perlmann and Jansson, 1995; Willy et al, 1995) RXRspecific ligands can in fact bind to and activate the heterodimer. There has also been considerable circumstantial evidence for an active partner role for RXR in biological responses in which RAR and RXR ligands act synergistically, for example in the growth and differentiation of cell lines (Apfel et al, 1995; Lotan et al., 1995; Roy et al., 1995) and in the activation of RA genes (Roy et al., 1995). Recently there has been direct evidence using receptor-specific synthetic ligands and receptors mutated in their C-terminal activation domains, that RXR can be active in RAR/RXR heterodimers (Schulman et al., 1996) and that the AF2 domains of both receptors contribute to activation (Botling et al., 1997). Additionally, fluorescence-based, in vivo footprinting, and proteolytic analyses of RAR/RXR heterodimers have shown physical changes following treatment with RXR ligands, indicative of ligand binding to the RXR part- 790 B. R. BECKETT AND MARTIN PETKOVICH ner in the heterodimer (Kersten et al, 1996; Minucci et al, 1997). It seems that the ability of RXR in a heterodimer partner to respond to ligand can depend on the relative orientation of the receptors, the activation status of the heterodimer partner, and the nature of the response element (La VistaPicard et al., 1996). The C-terminal activation domain, AF-2, is required for ligand-induced binding of co-activators and ligand-induced release of co-repressors from heterodimers. SRC-1 and other co-activators bind to both RXR and its heterodimer partners, and this binding occurs in the AF-2 region (Horwitz et al., 1996; Jeyakumar et al, 1997; Mengus et al, 1997; Shibata et al, 1997). Thus it seems that RXR is likely an active partner with the other receptors in the heterodimer pair, in ligand binding, and in determining interactions with both co-activators and co-repressors. The zebrafish RXR8 receptor is truncated at the C-terminus and is lacking three amino acids forming part of the activation domain AF-2, which are conserved in other zebrafish and mammalian RXRs. RXR8, like other RXRs which have small C-terminal deletions, can have a dominant negative effect on transcription (Durand et al, 1994; Leng et al, 1995; Zhang et al, 1994). If RXR was considered to be a silent partner necessary only to enhance DNA binding, these observations would be puzzling, but in light of the importance of AF-2 for release of co-repressor, the dominant negative effect is easily explained. Another observation for which we can now offer an explanation based on new information in the literature, is the apparent increase in the TR-stimulated activity of TR/RXR8 and TR/RXRe heterodimers by 9-cis RA. This was difficult to explain when the accepted wisdom was that RXR was a silent partner, and was also puzzling because RXR8 and RXRe both failed to bind 9-cis RA in in vitro assays. RXR and its heterodimer partners may allosterically influence each other. The first indication of this came from a study in the Evans lab (mentioned above; Forman et al, 1995) in which it was noted that ligand binding properties of RXR in a RAR/RXR hetero- dimer were altered by ligand binding of the RAR partner. Subsequently it has been found that binding of a ligand specific to RXR can conformationally alter its heterodimer partner (RAR, LXR, or OR1), resulting in binding of co-activator, release of co-repressor, and activation. This has been called the "phantom ligand" effect (Schulman et al, 1997; Wiebel and Gustafsson, 1997; Willy and Mangelsdorf, 1997). In view of these conformational changes imposed by receptors on their heterodimer partners, it is possible that RXRS and RXRe might bind ligand in vivo as part of a heterodimer pair, even though they are unable to bind 9-cis RA in vitro. Clearly more experiments are needed to determine the biological role of RXRS and RXRe. They may have altered affinity for ligand, co-activator, or co-repressor in heterodimers, and may provide an additional way of fine-tuning the RA signalling pathway in zebrafish. Their high level of expression in zebrafish caudal fin (Fig. 2) suggests they are biologically significant. It will be interesting to determine whether other types of fish and other vertebrates also express related RXRs. P450RAI: evolutionary conservation of RA metabolism The enzymes involved in synthesis and metabolism of RA and other biologically active retinoids are an important part of the RA signalling system, and if the RA signalling system is evolutionarily conserved, any enzyme which has a critical role in regulating RA levels should also be conserved. Recently (White et al, 1996; see above) we have cloned a new member of the cytochrome P450 family (P450RAI) from zebrafish. It has been designated CYP26 by the official cytochrome P450 nomenclature committee. P450RAI has features which indicate that it could play an important role in RA metabolism: 1) It is rapidly induced by retinoic acid (Abu-Abed et al, 1998; White et al, 1996) 2) It is developmentally regulated in zebrafish and mouse (White et al, 1996; M.P., unpublished data) 3) When expressed in transfected cells it rapidly metabolizes RA to 4-OH-RA, 4-oxo-RA, 18OH-RA, and water soluble metabolites 791 RETINOID SIGNALLING AND METABOLISM 3374 hP450RAI E1 mP450RAI ' 67% E2 E3 51% E4 65% E5 30% E6 59% E7 31% 3446 FIG. 5. Conservation of genomic structure between human and mouse P450RAI. The numbers above and below the lines represent the first and last nucleotide of the coding region of the human or mouse genes. E1-E7 refer to exons 1—7, and the lines between the exons represent introns. The numbers below the representation of the mouse gene refer to the % nucleotide identity between human and mouse introns. Everything is drawn to scale. (Abu-Abed et al, 1998; White et al, 1997; White et al, 1996) and 4) Expression of P450RAI message and RA metabolic activity are correlated in various cultured cell lines (Abu-Abed et al, 1998; M.P., personal communication). When the amino acid sequence of P450RAI from zebrafish, human, and mouse is compared (Abu-Abed et al., 1998), it can be seen that there is a high level of homology in all three vertebrate species, with overall amino acid identity of 68% between zebrafish and human, and 93% between mouse and human. Regions of nonhomology are short and are distributed throughout the length of the cDNA. Not only is the amino acid sequence of P450RAI conserved among the three species, but also the metabolic activity appears to be identical. It is RA-inducible in all three species, and at least in zebrafish and mouse, the developmental expression profile is similar (White et al, 1996, #62; D. Lohnes, personal communication). We have sequenced genomic clones of P450RAI from both mouse and human, and we find that there is remarkable conservation of the genomic structure and sequence. This is shown diagrammatically in Figure 5, in which it can be seen that the location, size, and sequence of the introns are conserved. Intron locations are identical, intron sizes are almost identical, and the nucleotide sequence varies between 30% and 67% identical. The presence of only 6 introns (like CYP1A) makes it one of the simplest mammalian cytochromes (Degtyarenko and Archakov, 1993). In addition, the sequence of the proximal promoter is very similar among zebrafish, mouse, and human, with a classic DR5 RARE close to the transcription start site (White et al, manuscript in preparation). The gene is very small, with the total size of the coding portion of the gene being 6.5 kilobases. CONCLUSIONS The retinoid signalling system is very complex, with many components including cytoplasmic and nuclear binding proteins, interacting nuclear proteins, and enzymes which synthesize and metabolize retinoids. Among the nuclear proteins that translate the retinoid signal into regulation of gene activity are retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and retinoid X receptors (RXRs). RXRs also interact with a wide range of other signalling systems acting through type II nuclear receptors. We have found that the amino acid sequence of RXRs in zebrafish is highly conserved compared to those of mammals, although there are differences among the subtypes, including two novel subtypes with altered function. In addition, we have found that a newly discovered cytochrome P450 (P450RAI, CYP26), which has properties consistent with its being an important regulator of RA concentration in vivo, is also conserved among zebrafish, mouse and human with regard to amino acid sequence, function, and expression. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Dr. Jim Gerlach for help with the phylogenetic analysis, and Jay White for the sequence of the human P450RAI 792 B. R. BECKETT AND MARTIN PETKOVICH gene. M.P. was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute of Canada and from the Medical Research Council of Canada. REFERENCES Abu-Abed, S. S., B. B. Beckett, H. Chiba, J. V. Chithalen, G. Jones, D. Metzger, P. Chambon, and M. Petkovich. 1998. Mouse P450RAI (CYP26) expression and retinoic acid-inducible retinoic acid metabolism in F9 cells are regulated by retinoic acid receptor y and retinoid X receptor a. J. Biol. Chem. 273:2409-2415. Achkar, C. C , F. Derguini, B. Blumberg, A. Langston, A. A. Levin, J. Speck, R. M. Evans, J. Bolado, Jr., K. Nakanishi, J. Buck, and L. J. Gudas. 1996. 4-Oxoretinol, a new natural ligand and transactivator of the retinoic acid receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 93:4879-4884. Ang, H. L. and G. Duester. 1997. Initiation of retinoid signalling in primitive streak mouse embryos: Spatiotemporal expression patterns of receptors and metabolic enzymes for ligand synthesis. Develop. Dynamics 208:536-543. Apfel, C. M., M. Kamber, M. Klaus, P. Mohr, S. Keidel, and P. K. Lemotte. 1995. Enhancement of HL60 differentiation by a new class of retinoids with selective activity on retinoid X receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 270:xxx-xxx. Blumberg, B., J. Bolado, Jr., E Derguini, A. G. Craig, T. A. Moreno, D. Charkaravarti, R. A. Heyman, J. Buck, and R. M. Evans. 1996. Novel RAR ligands in Xenopus embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 93:4873-4878. Botling, J., D. S. Castro, F. Oberg, K. Nilsson, and T Perlmann. 1997. Retinoic acid receptor/retinoid X receptor heterodimers can be activated through both subunits providing a basis for synergistic transactivation and cellular differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 272:9443-9449. Bourguet, W., M. Ruff, P. Chambon, H. Gronemeyer, and D. Moras. 1995. Crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain of the human nuclear receptor RXR-a. Nature 375:377-382. Bugge, T. H., J. Pohl, O. Lonnoy, and H. G. Stunnenberg. 1992. RXRa, a promiscuous partner of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors. EMBO J. 11:1409-1418. Chambon, P. 1994. The retinoid signaling pathway: Molecular and genetic analyses. Sem. Cell Biol. 5:115-125. Chen, H., R. J. Lin, R. L. Schiltz, D. Chakravarti, A. Nash, L. Nagy, M. L. Privalsky, Y. Nakatani, and R. M. Evans. 1997. Nuclear receptor coactivator ACTR is a novel histone acetyltransferase and forms a multimeric activation complex with P/ CAF and CBP/p300. Cell 90:569-580. Chen, J.-Y., S. Penco, J. Ostrowski, P. Balaguer, M. Pons, J. E. Starrett, P. Reczek, P. Chambon, and H. Gronemeyer. 1995. RAR-specific agonist/antagonists which which dissociate transactivation and API transrepression inhibit anchorage-inde- pendent cell proliferation. EMBO J. 14:11871197. Degtyarenko, K. N. and A. I. Archakov. 1993. Molecular evolution of P450 superfamily and P450-containing monooxygenase systems. FEBS Lett. 332: 1-8. Derguini, F., K. Nakanishi, U. Hammerling, R. Chue, T. Eppinger, E. Levi, and J. Buck. 1995. 13,14dihydroxy-retinol, a new bioactive retinol metabolite. J. Biol. Chem. 270:18875-18880. Dolle, P., E. Ruberte, P. Leroy, G. Morriss-Kay, and P. Chambon. 1990. Retinoic acid receptors and cellular retinoid binding proteins. I. A systematic study of their differential pattern of transcription during mouse organogenesis. Development 110: 1133-1151. Durand, B., M. Saunders, C. Gaudon, B. Roy, R. Losson, and P. Chambon. 1994. Activation function 2 (AF-2) of retinoic acid receptor and 9-cis retinoic acid receptor: Presence of a conserved autonomous constitutive activating domain and influence of the nature of the response element on AF-2 activity. EMBO J. 13:5370-5382. Eppinger, T. M., J. Buck, and U. Hammerling. 1993. Growth control or terminal differentiation: Endogenous production and differential activities of vitamin A metabolites in HL-60 cells. J. Exper. Med. 178:1995-2005. Escriva, H., R. Safi, C. Hanni, M.-C. Langlois, P. Saumitou-Laprade, D. Stehelin, A. Capron, R. Pierce, and V. Laudet. 1997. Ligand binding was acquired during evolution of nuclear receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 94:6803-6808. Fiorella, P. D. and J. L. Napoli. 1994. Microsomal retinoic acid metabolism: Effects of cellular retinoic acid-binding protein (type I) and C18-hydroxylation as an initial step. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1053810544. Forman, B. M., K. Umesono, J. Chen, and R. M. Evans. 1995. Unique response pathways are established by allosteric interactions among nuclear hormone receptors. Cell 81:541-550. Frolik, C. A., A. B. Roberts, T. E. Tavela, P. P. Roller, D. L. Newton, and M. B. Sporn. 1979. Isolation and identification of 4-hydroxy- and 4-oxoretinoic acid. In vitro metabolites of all-trans-retinoic acid in hamster trachea and liver. Biochemistry 18: 2092-2097. Fujii, H., T. Sato, S. Kaneko, O. Gotoh, Y. Fujii-Kuriyama, K. Osawa, S. Kato, and H. Hamada. 1997. Metabolic inactivation of retinoic acid by a novel P450 differentially expressed in developing mouse embryos. EMBO J. 16:4163-4173. Giguere, V., E. S. Ong, P. Segui, and R. M. Evans. 1987. Identification of a receptor for the morphogen retinoic acid. Nature 330:624—629. Glass, C. K., D. W. Rose, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1997. Nuclear receptor coactivators. Curr. Opinion Cell Biol. 9:222-232. Gudas, L. J., M. B. Sporn, and A. B. Roberts. 1994. Cellular biology and biochemistry of the retinoids. In M. B. Sporn, A. B. Roberts, and D. S. Goodman (eds.), ???. Raven Press, Ltd., New York. Hofmann, C. and G. Eichele. 1994. Retinoids in de- RETINOID SIGNALLING AND METABOLISM velopment. The Retinoids: Biology, Chemistry, and Medicine: 387-441. Hong, W. K., S. M. Lippmann, L. M. Itri, D. D. Karp, J. S. Lee, R. M. Byers, S. P. Schantz, A. M. Kramer, R. Lotan, L. J. Peters, I. W. Dimery, B. W. Brown, and H. Goepfert. 1990. Prevention of second primary tumors with isotretinoin in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. New Eng. J. Med. 323:795-801. Horwitz, K. B., T. A. Jackson, D. L. Bain, J. K. Richer, G. S. Takimoto, and L. Tung. 1996. Nuclear receptor coactivators and corepressors. Mol. Endo. 10:1167-1177. Janowski, B. A.. P. J. Willy, T. R. Devi, J. R. Falck. and D. Mangelsdorf. 1996. An oxysterol signalling pathway mediated by the nuclear receptor LXRct. Nature 383:728-731. Jeyakumar, M., M. R. Tanen, and M. K. Bagchi. 1997. Analysis of the functional role of steroid receptor coactivator-1 in ligand-induced transactivation by thyroid hormone receptor. Mol. Endo. 11:755767. Jones, B. and M. Petkovich. 1996. Targeting transcription through nuclear receptors. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2:155-168. Jones, B. B., C. K. Ohno, G. Allenby, M. B. Boffa, A. A. Levin, J. F. Grippo, and M. Petkovich. 1995. New retinoid X receptor subtypes in zebra fish (Danio rerid) differentially modulate transcription and do not bind 9-cis retinoic acid. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:5226-5234. Kersten, S., M. I. Kawson, B. A. Lewis, and N. Noy. 1996. Individual subunits of heterodimers comprised of retinoic acid and retinoid X receptors interact with their ligands independently. Biochemistry 35:3816-3824. Kliewer, S. A., K. Umesono, D. J. Mangelsdorf, and R. M. Evans. 1992. Retinoid X receptor interacts with nuclear receptors in retinoic acid, thyroid hormone and vitamin D3 signalling. Nature 355: 446-449. Kliewer, S. A., K. Umesono D. J. Noonan, R. A. Heyman, and R. M. Evans. 1992. Convergence of 9cis retinoic acid and peroxisome proliferator signalling pathways through heterodimer formation of their receptors. Nature 358:771-774. Korzus, E., J. Torchia, D. W. Rose, L. Xu, R. Kurokawa, E. M. Mclnerney, T.-M. Mullen, C. K. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1998. Transcription factor-specific requirements for coactivators and their acetyltransferase functions. Science 279: 703-707. Kurlandsky, S. B., J.-H. Xiao, E. Duell, J. J. Voorhees, and G. J. Fisher. 1994. Biological activity of alltrans retinol requires metabolic conversion to alltrans retinoic acid and is mediated through activation of nuclear retinoid receptors in human keratinocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 269:32821-32827. Kurokawa, R., M. DiRenzo, M. Boehm, B. Sugarman, B. Gloss, M. Rosenfeld, R. A. Heyman, and C. K. Glass. 1994. Regulation of retinoid signalling by receptor polarity and allosteric control of ligand binding. Nature 371:528-531. Kurokawa, R., D. Kalafus, M.-H. Ogliastro, C. Kious- 793 si, L. Xu, J. Torchia, M. G. Rosenfeld, and C. K. Glass. 1998. Differential use of CREB binding protein-coactivator complexes. Science 279:700703. Kurokawa, R., M. Soderstrom, A. Horlein, S. Halachmi, M. Brown, M. G. Rosenfeld, and C. K. Glass. 1995. Polarity-specific activities of retinoic acid receptors determined by a co-repressor. Nature 377:451-454. La Vista-Picard, N., P. D. Hobbs, M. Pfahl, M I. Dawson, and M. Pfahl. 1996. The receptor-DNA complex determines the retinoid response: A mechanism for the diversification of the ligand signal. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4137-4146. Lala, D. S., R. Mukherjee, I. G. Schulman, S. S. Canan Koch, L. J. Kardashti, A. M. Nadzan, G. E. Croston, R. M. Evans, and R. A. Heyman. 1996. Activation of specific RXR heterodimers by an antagonist of RXR homodimers Nature 383:450453. Lampron, C, C. Rochette-Egly, P. Gorry, P. Dolle, M. Mark, T. Lufkin, M. LeMeur, and P. Chambon. 1995. Mice deficient in cellular retinoic acid binding protein II (CRABPII) or in both CRABPI and CRABPII are essentially normal. Development 121:539-548. Leblanc, B. P. and H. G. Stunnenberg. 1995. 9-cis retinoic acid signaling: Changing partners causes some excitement. Genes Dev. 9:1811—1816. Lehmann, J. M., B. Hoffmann, and M. Pfahl. 1991. Genomic organization of the retinoic acid receptor gamma gene. Nucl. Acids Res. 19:573-578. Lehmann, J. M., S. A. Kliewer, L. B. Moore, T. A. Smith-Oliver, B. B. Oliver, J.-L. Su, S. S. Sundseth, D. A. Winegar, D. E. Blanchard, T. A. Spencer, and T. M. Willson. 1997. Activation of the nuclear receptor LXR by oxysterols defines a new hormone response pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 3137-3140. Leid, M., P. Kastner, B. Durand, A. Krust, P. Leroy, R. Lyons, C. Mendelsohn, S. Nagpal, H. Nakshatri, C. Reibel, M. Saunders, and P. Chambon. 1993. Retinoic acid signal transduction pathways. Annals New York Acad. Sci. 684:19-34. Leid, M., P. Kastner, R. Lyons, H. Nakshatri, M. Saunders, T. Zacharewski, J.-Y. Chen, A. Staub, J.-M. Gamier, S. Mader, and P. Chambon. 1992. Purification, cloning, and RXR identity of the HeLa cell factor with which RXR or TR heterodimerizes to bind target sequences efficiently. Cell 68:377395. Leng, X., J. Blanco, S. Y. Tsai, K. Ozato, B. W. O'Malley, and M.-J. Tsai. 1995. Mouse retinoid X receptor contains a separable ligand-binding and transactivation domain in its E region. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:255-263. Liu, Q. and E. Linney. 1993. The mouse retinoid-X receptor--/ gene: Genomic organization and evidence for functional isoforms. Mol. Endo. 7:651658. Lotan, R., M. R. Dawson, C. C. Zou, L. Jong, D. Lotan, and C. P. Zou. 1995. Enhanced efficacy of combinations of retinoic acid- and retinoid X re- 794 B. R. BECKETT AND MARTIN PETKOVICH ceptor-selective retinoids and alphs-interferon in inhibition. Cancer Res. 55:232-236. Lubahn, D. B., T. R. Brown, J. A. Simental, H. N. Higgs, C. J. Migeon, E. M. Wilson, and F. S. French. 1989. Sequence of the intron/exon junctions of the coding region of the human androgen receptor gene and identification of a point mutation in a family with complete androgen insensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 86:95349538. Mangelsdorf, D. J., U. Borgmeyer, R. A. Heyman, J. Y. Zhou, E. S. Ong, A. E. Oro, A. Kazizuka, and R. M. Evans. 1992. Characterization of three RXR genes that mediate the action of 9-ci.v retinoic acid. Genes Dev. 6:329-344. Mangelsdorf, D. J. and R. M. Evans. 1995. The RXR heterodimers and orphan receptors. Cell 83:841850. Mangelsdorf, D. J., E. S. Ong, J. A. Dyck, and R. M. Evans. 1990. Nuclear receptor that identifies a noval retinoic acid response pathway. Nature 345: 224-229. Mangelsdorf, D. J., K. Umesono, S. Kliewer, U. Borgmeyer, E. Ong, and R. Evans. 1992. A direct repeat in the cellular retinol-binding protein type II gene confers differential regulation by RXR and RAR. Cell 66:555-561. Marks, M. S., P. L. Hallenbeck, T. Nagata, J. H. Segars, E. Appella, V. M. Nikodem, and K. Ozato. 1992. H-2RIIBP (RXRp) heterodimerization provides a mechanism for combinatorial diversity in the regulation of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone responsive genes. EMBO J. 11:1419-1435. Means, A. L. and L. J. Gudas. 1995. The roles of retinoids in vertebrate development. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 64:201-233. Meier, C. A. 1997. Regulation of gene expression by nuclear hormone receptors. J. Receptor Signal Transd. Res. 17:319-335. Mendelsohn, C , E. Ruberte, and P. Chambon. 1992. Retinoid receptors in vertebrate limb development. Develop. Biol. 152:50-61. Mengus, G., M. May, L. Carre, P. Chambon, and I. Davidson. 1997. Human TAF(II)135 potentiates transcriptional activaation by the AF-2s of the retinoic acid, vitamin D3, and thyroid hormone receptors in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 11:13811395. Meyskens, F. L. J. and A. Manetta. 1995. Prevention of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 62(6 Suppl.): 1417S1419S. Minucci, S., M. Leid, R. Toyama, J. P. Saint-Jeannet, V. J. Peterson, V. Horn, J. E. Ishmael, N. Bhattacharyya, A. Dey, I. B. Dawid, and K. Ozato. 1997. Retinoid X receptor (RXR) within the RXR-retinoic acid receptor heterodimer binds its ligand and enhances retinoid-dependent gene expression. Mol. Cell. Biol 17:644-655. Mukherjee, R., P. M A. Davies, D. L. Crombie, E. D. Bischoff, R. M Cesario, L. Jow, L. G. Hamann, M. E Boehm, C. E. Mondon, A. M. Nadzan, J. R. Paterniti, Jr., and R. A. Heyman. 1997. Sensiti- zation of deabetic and obese mice to insulin by retinoid X receptor agonists. Nature 386:407-410. Naar, A. M., J.-M. Boutin, S. M. Lipkin, V. C. Yu, J. M. Holloway, C. K. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1991. The orientation and spacing of core DNAbinding motifs dictate selective transcriptional responses to three nuclear receptors. Cell 65:1267— 1279. Napoli, J. L. 1996. Retinoic acid biosynthesis and metabolism. FASEB J. 10:993-1001. Perlmann, T. and L. Jansson. 1995. A novel pathway for vitamin A signaling mediated by RXR heterodimerization with NGFI-B and NURR1. Genes Dev. 9:769-782. Petkovich, M., N. Brand, A. Krust, and P. Chambon. 1987. A human retinoic acid receptor which belongs to the family of nuclear receptors. Nature 330:444-450. Pijnappel, W. W., H. F. Hendriks, G. E. Folkers, C. E. van den Brink, E. J. Dekker, C. Edelenbosch, P. T. van der Saag, and A. J. Durston. 1993. The retinoid ligand 4-oxo-retinoic acid is a highly active modulator of positional specification. Nature 366:340-4. Ponglikitmongkol, M., S. Green, and P. Chambon. 1988. Genomic organization of the human oestrogen receptor gene. EMBO J. 7:3385-3388. Ray, W. J., G. Bain, M. Yao, and D. I. Gottlieb. 1997. CYP26, a novel mammalian cytochrome P450, is induced by retinoic acid and defines a new family. J. Biol. Chem. 272:18702-18708. Renaud, J. P., N. Rochel, M. Ruff, V. Vivat, P. Chambon, H. Gronemeyer, and D. Moras. 1995. Crystal structure of the RAR-7 ligand-binding domain bound to all-fran.? retinoic acid. Nature 378:681689. Roberts, A. B., C. A. Frolik, M. D. Nichols, and M. B. Sporn. 1979a. Retinoid-dependent induction of the in vivo and in vitro metabolism of retinoic acid in tissues of the vitamin A-deficient hamster. J. Biol. Chem. 254:6303-6309. Roberts, A. B., M. D. Nichols, D. L. Newton, and M. B. Sporn. 1979fo. In vitro metabolism of retinoic acid in hamster intestine and liver. J. Biol. Chem. 254:6296-6302. Rottman, J. N., R. L. Widom, V. Nadal-Ginard, V. Mahdavi, and S. K. Karathanasis. 1991. A retinoic acid-responsive element in the apolipoprotein AI gene distinguishes between two different retinoic acid response pathways. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11: 3814-3820. Roy, B., R. Taneja, and P. Chambon. 1995. Synergistic activation of retinoic acid (RA)-responsive genes and induction of embryonal carcinoma cell differentiation by an RA receptor alphs (RAR alpha)-, RAR beta-, or RAR gamma-selective ligand in combination with a retinoid X receptor-specific ligand. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:6481-6487. Ruberte, E., P. Colle, P. Chambon, and G. Morriss-Kay. 1991. Retinoic acid receptors and cellular retinoid binding proteins. II. Their differential pattern of transcription during early morphogenesis in mouse embryos. Development 111:45-60. Ruberte, E., P. Dolle, A. Krust, A. Zelent, G. Morriss- RETINOID SIGNALLING AND METABOLISM Kay, and P. Chambon. 1990. Specific spatial and temporal distribution of retinoic acid receptor gamma transcripts during mouse embryogenesis. Development 108:213-222. Ruberte, E., V. Friederich, P. Chambon, and G. Morriss-Kay. 1993. Retinoic acid receptors and cellular retinoid binding proteins. III. Their differential transcript distribution during mouse nervous system development. Development 118:267-282. Schulman, I. G., H. Juguilon, and R. M. Evans. 1996. Activation and repression by nuclear hormone receptors: Hormone modulates an equilibrium between active and repressive states. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:3807-3813. Schulman, I. G., C. Li, J. W. R. Schwabe, and R. M. Evans. 1997. The phantom ligand effect: Allosteric control of transcription by the retinoid X receptor. Genes Dev. 11:299-308. Shibata, H., T. E. Spencer, S. A. Onate, G. Jenster, S. Y. Tsai, M.-J. Tsai, and B. W. O'Malley. 1997. Role of co-activators and co-repressors in the mechanism of steroid/thyroid receptor action. Rec. Prog. Hormone Res. 52:141-164. Soderstrom, M., A. Vo, T. Heinzel, R. M. Lavinski, W. M. Yang, E. Seto, D. A. Peterson, M. G. Rosenfeld, and C. K. Glass. 1997. Differential effects of nuclear receptor corepressor (N-CoR) expression levels on retinoic acid receptor-mediated repression support the existence of dynamically regulated corepressor complexes. Mol. Endo. 11:682692. Thaller, C. and G. Eichele. 1990. Isolation of 3,4-didehydroretinoic acid, a novel morphogenetic signal in the chick wing bud. Nature 345:815-819. Umesono, K., K. K. Murakami, C. C. Thompson, and R. M. Evans. 1991. Direct repeats as selective response elements for the thyroid hormone, retinoic acid and vitamin D3 receptors. Cell 65:1255-1266. van der Leede, B. M., G. E. Folkers, and F. Kruyt. 1992. Anomic organization of the human retinoic acid receptor p2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 188:695-702. Warrell, R. P. 1996. Pathogenesis and management of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Ann. Rev. Med. 47:555-565. White, J. A.. B. Beckett-Jones, Y. Guo, F. J. Dilworth, J. Bonasoro, G. Jones, and M. Petkovich. 1997. cDNA cloning of human retinoic acid metabolizing enzyme (hP450RAI) identifies a novel family 795 of cytochrome P450 (CYP26). J. Biol. Chem. 272: 18538-18541. White, J. A., M. B. Boffa, B. Jones, and M. Petkovich. 1994. A zebrafish retinoic acid receptor expressed in the regenerating caudal fin. Development 120: 1861-72. White. J. A., Y. Guo, K. Baetz, B. Beckett-Jones, J. Bonasoro, K. E. Hsu, E J. Dilworth, G. Jones, and M. Petkovich. 1996. Identification of the retinoic acid-inducible all-trans-retinoic acid 4-hydroxylase. J. Biol. Chem. 271:29922-29927. Wiebel, E E and J.-A. Gustafsson. 1997. Heterodimeric interaction between retinoid X receptor a and orphan nuclear receptor OR1 reveals dimerization-induced activation as a novel mechanism of nuclear receptor activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 3977-3986. Willy, P. J. and D. J. Mangelsdorf. 1997. Unique requirements for retinoid-dependent transcriptional activation by the orphan receptor LXR. Genes Dev. 11:289-298. Willy, P. J., K. Umesono, E. S. Ong, R. M. Evans, R. A. Heyman, and D. J. Mangelsdorf. 1995. LXR, a nuclear receptor that defines a distinct retinoid response pathway. Genes Dev. 9:1033-1045. Wolffe, A. P. 1997. Transcriptional control: Sinful repression. Nature 387:16-17. Wurtz, J.-M., W. Bourguet, J.-R Renaud, V. Vivat, P. Chambon, D. Moras, and H. Gronemeyer. 1996. A canonical structure for the ligand-binding domain of nuclear receptors. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3:87-94. Yu, V. C , C. Delsert, B. Andersen, J. M. Holloway, O. V. Devary, A. M. Naar, S. Y. Kim, J.-M. Boutin, C. K. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1991. RXRfJ: A coregulator that enhances binding of retinoic acid, thyroid hormone, and vitamin D receptors to their cognate response elements Cell 67:1251-1266. Zhang, X., B. Hoffmann, P. B.-V. Tran, G. Graupner, and M. Pfahl. 1992a. Retinoid X receptor is an auxiliary protein for thyroid hormone and retinoic acid receptors. Nature 355:441-446. Zhang, X.-K., J. Lehmann, B. Hoffmann, M. I. Dawson, J. Cameron, G. Graupner, T. Hermann, P Tran, and M. Pfahl. 19926. Homodimer formation of retinoid X receptor induced by 9-c/.v-retinoic acid. Nature 358:587-591. Zhang, X. K., G. Salbert, M.-O. Lee. and M. Pfahl. 1994. Mutations that alter ligand-induced switches and dimerization activities in the retinoid X receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:4311-4323. Corresponding Editor: David O. Norris