* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Flow Cytometry - From Discovery to Clinical Analysis | Charles River
Endomembrane system wikipedia , lookup
Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Cell growth wikipedia , lookup
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Cytoplasmic streaming wikipedia , lookup
Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Issue 224 | June 2014 Flow Cytometry – From Discovery to Clinical Analysis Flow cytometry is a laser-based technology that analyzes multiple characteristics of a single particle (usually cells). It allows multiparametric analysis of thousands of particles per second and helps to adequately identify or functionally characterize complex cell populations of interest. Flow cytometry is a versatile technology for developing drug-specific assays. It is often used in basic research, discovery, preclinical and clinical trials. With the increasing proportion of biologics in the pipeline, flow cytometry has proven itself to be an indispensable tool in many cases to assess safety, receptor occupancy or pharmacodynamics. In discovery, flow cytometry technology can be used to screen drug candidates for changes in immunophenotype or cell function using ex vivo or in vivo designs. Plate-format assays requiring only small amounts of samples and/or drugs can de developed, using multicolor fluorescence and high-throughput acquisition. During the preclinical phase, flow cytometry has routinely been used for assessing the immunotoxicology of a candidate drug by evaluating the immunophenotype of various cell populations in whole blood, tissue or other matrices. In addition, receptor occupancy (RO) is commonly included in preclinical programs to evaluate the binding of the drug to target cells. Flow cytometry can also be used to assess pharmacodynamic (PD) markers of interest for further elucidation of on- or off-target effects. In a clinical setting, flow cytometry can be used for safety, RO and PD assessments. Flow cytometry has also been used to investigate the mechanisms of action of toxicity. DISCOVERY • Functional assays (efficacy assays) PRECLINICAL CLINICAL •Safety (immunophenotyping, functional assays, nAb assays) • Receptor occupancy •Pharmacodynamics (functional assays) •Safety (immunophenotyping, functional assays) • Receptor occupancy •Pharmacodynamics (functional assays) The expert scientific staff at Charles River can provide services for flow cytometry method transfer, method development, method validation, and high-quality sample analysis and interpretation in accordance with Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) requirements and applicable clinical GLP requirements. Our immunology groups provide services to support clients’ need to evaluate the potential effect of their compound on various cell populations and/or functions. Our experience includes evaluation of various types of test articles, including, but not limited to, monoclonal antibodies, antibody drug conjugates, small molecules, proteins and peptides. Furthermore, Charles River can develop novel flow cytometric assays as needed, if appropriate reagents are available, that can be carried through from discovery to the clinical phase. Fluorochrome conjugation services are also available if the reagent is not available commercially. Our Preclinical Services group has expertise in flow cytometry at all 3 levels of drug development, from discovery screening to clinical analysis. In this Researcher, we present several types of assays developed by Charles River and offered as general assays or developed specifically for a compound. download previous Researcher issues on The SourceSM, please visit www.criver.com/thesource Immunophenotyping Immunophenotyping is the analysis of heterogeneous cell populations to identify the presence and proportions of various populations of interest. Antibodies are used to identify cells by detecting specific markers expressed by these cells (cell surface markers or intracellular markers). Changes in these populations, as an effect of the drug, are observed as depletion, activation, expansion or migration to various organs. Immunophenotyping can be performed in various tissues (e.g., thymus, spleen, lymph node, bone marrow), in peripheral blood, and broncheoalveolar fluid (BALF). Immunophenotyping of T, B and NK cells is a common endpoint added to preclinical studies in order to assess the potential immunotoxicity effect of a drug. While changes in cell phenotypes are useful in some settings to characterize the immunotoxicity of different compounds, phenotypic analysis alone is often not a sensitive indicator of low-dose immunotoxicity for many agents that alter immune function. Substances that exert selective toxicity on lymphoid and myeloid cells may be discovered through immunophenotypic analysis. However, most agents produce immunotoxicity at doses much lower than those required to produce cytotoxicity or interfere with primary lymphoid organ differentiation. Some of the most potent immunosuppressive chemicals that have been tested, such as cyclosporine A, do not alter the number of cells/immunophenotype at doses that are immunosuppressive, even though the immune cell function is altered. In these cases, immunophenotyping can be assessed in conjunction with functional parameters such as a cytoxic T-cell assay or a natural-killer cell activity assay to identify the immunotoxic effects. Immunophenotyping may also, in some instances, be used as a pharmacodynamic endpoint. Indeed, some drugs, such as rituximab, are designed to specifically deplete lymphocyte populations. In such cases, immunophenotyping is a sensitive endpoint to monitor the efficacy of the drug. The list of cell surface markers or intracellular markers is growing fast and is practically limitless, given that any antibody can be labeled with a variety of fluorochromes for potential flow cytometry uses whenever pre-labeled antibodies are not already available. Although the availability of antibodies is vast, it should be taken into account when designing studies that availability of antibodies reactive in species like canine, swine and/or rabbit will be limited compared to antibodies for humans, NHPs or rodents. Identification of small populations Flow cytometry is often a more sensitive platform for the detection of small cell populations. For example, regulatory T cells represent only 1-2% of total lymphocytes in peripheral blood, but these cells serve a vital immunosuppressive function. Monitoring the expression of regulatory T-cell markers CD25 and FoxP3 during administration of a drug is important for determination of immunotoxicity (e.g., immunomodulation, oncology drugs). Bone marrow (BM)-derived CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells are another example of a small population that can be identified by flow cytometry at concentrations as low as < 5 cells per µL. Many other cell populations, such as iNKT and dendritic cells, have also been analyzed by flow cytometry, generally to demonstrate the efficacy of a specific drug. Tetramer technology The tetramer technology allows the identification of T cells that respond to a particular antigen. MHC tetramers are formed by first refolding MHCs in the presence of high concentrations of the desired antigenic peptide, followed by biotinylation of the carboxy-terminus of one chain of the MHC molecule. This MHC/peptide complex can then be bound to streptavidin and exposed to T cells. The use of fluorophore-labeled streptavidin for tetramer formation allows for efficient detection by flow cytometry. The use of the tetramer technology facilitates accurate discrimination of rare, specific T cells (less than 1% of the population). Additional markers can be used to further characterize the cell population binding the specific peptide tested. As the peptide of interest is drug-dependent, tetramer assays need to be developed for each specific project. Micronucleus Flow cytometry can also be used to improve the throughput of traditional but less effective methodology. One example is the manual micronucleus method, which is used as a genetic toxicology parameter. The conversion of this method to flow cytometry readout results in a more efficient assay in which a larger number of red blood cells is used for scoring (100 vs. > 10,000 cells). The Litron PigA assay measures genetic toxicity by detecting mutations in the PigA gene, which is required for the synthesis of GPI anchors for cell surface proteins. The PigA gene is located on the X chromosome; therefore, male (XY) individuals, who have only a single copy of the gene, and females (XX), who also have only one functional copy of the gene due to X-chromosome inactivation, both lose cell surface expression GPI-anchored proteins as a result of a single inactivating mutation of the gene. Mutations in PigA are neutral and do not convey any survival advantage or disadvantage; therefore the incidence of PigA mutations should accurately reflect mutation rates. The PigA assay uses flow cytometry to measure the expression of CD59 on erythrocytes and reticulocytes; a GPI-anchordeficient phenotype indicates PigA mutation in bone marrow precursor cells. The analysis requires small volumes of blood from treated animals and does not require sacrifice; the test is therefore suitable as an add-on to existing long-term studies. Functional Assays Functional flow cytometry endpoints can be simple or complex assays. In general, these assays require a cell function which can be detected by antibodies towards a protein or marker of the functional pathway of interest, a dye which can discriminate a cell’s status or activity, or by an enzyme-substrate reaction. These assays can be carried out to determine in vivo, ex vivo (with an in vitro stimulation), or in vitro functions of the target cell of interest. Below are examples of functional assays using flow cytometry. Oxidative burst/phagocytosis Phagocytosis by neutrophils and monocytes constitutes an essential arm of innate immunity against bacterial or fungal infections. The phagocytic process can be separated into several major stages: chemotaxis (migration of phagocytes to inflammatory sites), attachment of particles to the cell surface of phagocytes, ingestion (phagocytosis) and intracellular killing by oxygen-dependent (oxidative burst) and oxygenindependent mechanisms. The phagocytosis assay consists of measuring the amount of fluorescent bacteria ingested by phagocytes to quantitatively determine the ability of leukocytes to function in the presence of a drug. After phagocytosis, granulocytes and monocytes produce reactive oxygen metabolites which destroy bacteria inside the phagosome. The oxidative burst assay measures the formation of the reactive oxidants by the enzymatic oxidation of a fluorogenic substrate, DHR 123. These assays can be used both as a safety or an efficacy endpoint. Figure 1. Granulocyte function by flow cytometry Oxidave burst Baseline Normal sample (E.Coli) Inhibited sample (E.Coli + Cyto D) Posive control (PMA) Phagocytosis Baseline Normal sample (E. coli) Inhibited sample (E. coli + Cyto D) Indicators of cell death and injury There are many fluorescent probes that can be used in flow cytometry as indicators of cell injury and stress. The selection of these markers should be based on the utility of the intended data. Markers available include those for membrane integrity, cell viability, death pathways, oxidative stress as well as other stress markers. Indication of cell injury or death can be used for safety evaluation in vivo as well as in vitro assays to assess the impact of a drug on target cells. Basophil activation Both true allergic and pseudo-allergic reactions can result in anaphylactoid-type symptoms because common mediators are released (e.g., histamine leukotrienes, etc.). It is often not possible to implicate IgE in a direct role for many adverse reactions. The basophil activation test performed by flow cytometry can give an indication of a Type I-like hypersensitivity reaction. In this type of assay, basophils are identified as CCR3+, and upon activation, CD63, a marker present within the basophil granules, becomes externalized and presented on the surface of the cells. Activated basophils can then be monitored through the level of CD63 expressed at the surface. Figure 2. Basophil degranulation by flow cytometry Negave control Figure 3. Platelet activation by flow cytometry Resng platelets Acvated platelets SSC SSC Resng platelets CD61 CD61 Pac 1 + Act platelets PAC-1 PAC1 Intracellular protein expression A variety of antibodies are available to study intracellular protein expression in different cell class subtypes. When combined with surface marker expression in lymphoid cells, these assays become extremely powerful for assessing the effects of drugs on defined cell populations. Examples of assays that can be performed in lymphoid subsets include intracellular cytokine expression and various cell signaling expression ranging from general phosphotyrosine to specific phosphoproteins. Key phosphorylation pathways, such as those involving the molecules p38, ERK, MEK, PKCs, IP3, ZAP70, etc., can be identified for specific cell subsets (lymphocytes, phagocytes, basophils and eosinophils) and can be included in standard flow cytometry assays to identify specific phosphorylation cascades modulated by various compounds. Currently, the most widely-used phospho-specific antibodies for T-cell functions are antibodies targeting MAP kinase phosphorylation and STAT protein phosphorylation. fMLP Platelet activation Flow cytometry is not limited to the evaluation of immune cell functions. Methods for functional assessment of other types of cells are available. For example, flow cytometric analysis of platelets is commonly used to study many aspects of platelet biology and function (in vivo and ex vivo). Isolated platelets or anticoagulated whole blood can be incubated with a variety of reagents that bind specifically to individual platelet proteins, granules and lipid membranes to monitor the activation state of platelets. Platelet activation triggers significant remodeling of the platelet cell surface. Among the markers used to monitor platelet activation, we find P selectin (CD62P), the GPIIb/IIIa complex (PAC-1), fibrinogen, and the measurement of platelet-leukocyte aggregates. Charles River is uniquely capable of conducting studies using platelet activation assays as endpoints, as these assays require immediate processing and special handling in the laboratory, which is located on the same premises as the vivarium. PAC1 Cell activation Expression of many adhesion molecules and growth receptors is altered on leukocytes during cell activation and differentiation. Many of these molecules are lineage-associated and can be used to identify subsets as well as altered expression following exposure to drugs. Several examples of adhesion molecules that are up- or down-regulated in response to immune activation or toxicants exist, the most common being CD25 (IL-2R), CD62L (L-selectin) and CD69 (C-type lectin). Other markers of cell activation and proliferation that are being increasingly utilized include various cytokine and chemokine receptors and proliferating cell antigens such as Ki67 protein. An-FcεRI Ab Resng platelets CD62P CD62P CD62P+ Act platelets CD62P Receptor Occupancy As many monoclonal antibody drug therapeutics bind to specific cell surface receptors, it is often useful to quantify the receptor occupancy of a specific cell subpopulation by the drug. Typical approaches involve the use of competitive (binding is blocked by the investigational drug) and noncompetitive (binds to a different epitope of the antigen targeted by the investigational drug) fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (see Figure 1). The end result is a customized assay for a particular biological drug, which may yield useful information relevant to dosage, safety and efficacy. Figure 4. Receptor occupancy assay design by flow cytometry Unlabeled rituximab or rituximab-MMAE/TA FITC-labeled rituximab or rituximab-MMAE/TA Platelet-bound immunoglobulins Immune-mediated platelet destruction is a common cause of thrombocytopenia. Immune-mediated platelet destruction occurs when circulating platelets coated with antibody, antigen-antibody complexes or complement are phagocytozed by macrophages. Some drugs have the capability to induce the production of antibodies binding to various structural platelet antigens, resulting in accelerated platelet destruction. The quantitation of platelet-associated immunoglobulin by flow cytometry is helpful to confirm a diagnosis of immunemediated thrombocytopenia; it can also determine the subclass of immunoglobulins (IgA, IgM or IgG) binding the platelets. Figure 6. Detection of platelet-bound antibodies by flow cytometry Pre-Dose Post-Dose Negative control Human Anti-IgA Human Anti-IgM Human Anti-IgG CD20 CD19 Anti-CD19 Immunogenicity Immunogenicity refers to the ability of a drug to induce an immune response. The concerns associated with an immunogenic response are that anti-drug antibodies (ADA) could potentially: • increase or decrease the clearance of a drug, • form aggregates with a drug and induce toxicity, • alter the biological activity of a drug through the formation of neutralizing antibodies (nAb), • cross react with endogenous proteins, or • induce drug allergenicity through the formation of anti-IgE ADA. A measurement of ADA is routinely done by ELISA or ECL. However, when the neutralizing potential of these antibodies needs to be determined, a more complex bioassay needs to be developed. Some of these assays utilize a flow cytometrybased platform. Figure 5. Neutralizing antibodies by flow cytometry Neutralizing Mean anbody amount Fluorescence (µg/mL) Intensity 0 791 3.13 397 6.25 144 12.5 19 25.0 11 50.0 8 Black line = unstained cells -- nAb amount MFI ++ ++ Advantages of outsourcing flow cytometry assays: - Highly experienced scientists willing to work as a member of your team for the development of novel assays - Significant degree of standardization for custom cell-based assays implemented globally - Identical flow cytometry platforms available to perform all assays - Validated SOP-driven methods - Minimized variation in the final data set, as interinstrument and interanalyst variability is assessed during validation; this increases the standardization of results generated - Time savings - Trained personnel provide access to resources not available internally - Internal resources freed up for other purposes -- For additional information, please visit The SourceSM, a secure portal that provides registered users with direct access to the technical, scientific and educational resources available from Charles River. To register, please visit www.criver.com/thesource askcharlesriver@crl.com www.criver.com