* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Document
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
LOW CARBON DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Transforming Guyana’s Economy While Combating Climate Change SUB-NATIONAL OUTREACH – Kato, REGION 8 Kato Primary School 25 August, 2014 Introduction In June 2009 the Government of Guyana (GoG) launched its Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS), which aims to transform Guyana’s economy on to a low carbon, sustainable development trajectory, while simultaneously combating climate change. The LCDS aims to protect and maintain the forests in an effort to reduce global carbon emissions and at the same time attract payments from developed countries for the climate services that the forests provide to the world; payments are invested to foster growth and development along a low carbon emissions path. In November 2009, Guyana and Norway signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in which Norway committed to providing financial support of up to US$250 million by 2015 for results achieved by Guyana in limiting emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, to support the implementation of Guyana’s LCDS. Under the MOU, contributions from Norway are channelled through the multi-contributor Guyana REDD+ Investment Fund (GRIF), established in October 2010 for which the World Bank is Trustee, towards priority projects identified in the LCDS. Guyana’s LCDS has made significant progress since its 2009 launch. The LCDS is now in the implementation phase. Following three successive years of performance in accordance with the Norway MoU and the Joint Concept Note (JCN) which sets out the framework for taking the Guyana-Norway cooperation forward, Guyana has met the requirements for performance‐based payments to the tune of US$115M. These funds are being invested in the LCDS projects. The JCN stipulates that the continuation of result-based financial support from Norway to Guyana will depend on publicly observable progress on forest governance. The JCN identifies ‘Indicators of Enabling Activities’ where performance in enabling activities will be measured against progress on five key categories of activities. Two such categories relate to the ‘Continuous multi-stakeholder consultation process’ and ‘the rights of indigenous peoples and other local forest communities as regards REDD-plus’. The GoG is committed to fully inform and engage with stakeholders across Guyana in the decision making for matters affecting their well-being. As a result, in this first phase, the Hinterland outreach programme targets Regions 1, 7, 8 and 9 as part of the Office of Climate Change (OCC) wider outreach programme as described in the Annual Stakeholder Awareness and Engagement Plan 2013. This component directly relates to the performance indicators, Continuous Multi-Stakeholder Consultation Process and The Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Other Local Forest Communities as Regards REDD+, as outlined in the Revised JCN. A similar approach to the national outreach and awareness sessions conducted in 2009 is being adopted by the OCC for this Hinterland outreach programme. The OCC is spearheading the planning of these sessions in collaboration with the Ministry of Amerindian Affairs (MoAA). The main objectives of this outreach session are: 1. To update the public and in particular Amerindian Villages on key issues related to climate change and LCDS implementation; 2. To provide a systematic and transparent process of multi-stakeholder engagement enabling the participation of all potentially affected and interested stakeholders in the LCDS process; and 3. To support the overall goals and objectives of Guyana’s LCDS. 2 This outreach session was held in Kato, Region 8. It brought together stakeholders from a number of communities, inclusive of Toshaos, Councillors, students and residents and included representatives from communities such as Paramakatoi, Kato Village, Kopinang Village, Maik-Wak, Kurukabaru, Moraikobai, Kaibarupai Village, Taruka Village, Monkey Mountain, Chiung Mouth, Kanapang Village, Kamana Village, Luseneng Village and Bamboo Creek. This report captures the discussions made at the session, the key issues identified and any suggestions and/or recommendations emanating from the discussions. There were 87 registered participants at the Kato outreach session. The complete list of representatives is included in Appendix A. 3 GUYANA LOW-CARBON DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Transforming Guyana’s Economy While Combating Climate Change National Stakeholder Outreach and Awareness 2014 – Region 8 Kato Primary School 25 August 2014 PROGRAMME 10:00 Registration 10:30 Call to Order by Chairperson (Regional Chairman) 10:40 National Pledge & Prayer 10:50 Welcome by Regional Chairman 11:00 Introductions (Outreach Team and Representatives of Villages) 11:30 Brief Remarks: Mr Derrick John, NTC Chair & MSSC Member Mr Ashton Simon, NADF & MSSC Member 11:50 Presentation: Ms Gitanjali Chandarpal, Head, Office of Climate Change 12:10 Presentation: Minister Pauline Sukhai, Minister of Amerindian Affairs 12:30 Open Discussion 13:45 Closing Remarks: Chairperson LUNCH 4 Outreach Session Outreach Team The members of the Outreach Team were: Honourable Minister Pauline Sukhai Ms Gitanjali Chandarpal Ms Shereeda Yusuf Ms Monique Jones Mr Narendra Rajcoomar Mr Navindra Persaud Mr Derrick John Mr Ashton Simon Minister, Ministry of Amerindian Affairs Head, Office of Climate Change Technical Officer, Office of Climate Change Administrative Officer, Office of Climate Change IT Officer, Office of Climate Change Finance Officer, Project Management Office Chair NTC & MSSC Member Representative NADF & MSSC Member Summary of the Presentations This session was chaired by Mr Shameer Arjun, Assistant Regional Education Officer of Region 8 and the presenters were: (i) Hon. Minister Sukhai; (ii) Ms Chandarpal; (iii) Mr John; and (iv) Mr Simon Participants were welcomed to the outreach session. Presenters discussed the issue of climate change; the importance of climate change actions, and the critical role Guyana’s LCDS plays in the fight against climate change. Mr Derrick John notified participants that the LCDS needs support from villages. LCDS information is constantly being shared to village leaders. It is the task of the leaders to share the information provided to villagers. The GoG should not be blamed for villagers lacking information. The outreach session is one initiative that the GoG has undertaken to ensure that people are updated on the LCDS and its projects. Mr Ashton Simon remarked that some groups have been undermining the LCDS, which incorporates the best practices of Amerindians. Leaders should dispel any misunderstanding. He indicated that the young will soon be in leadership positions and that these youngsters should be nurtured. The LCDS hinges on all types of activities and the management styles of youths for these activities should be encouraged. Ms Gitanjali Chandarpal informed participants of climate change, its impacts and effects. She emphasised the need for world leaders to take action in the fight against climate change and indicated that there are two major ways by which this can be done, that is, adaptation and mitigation. Ms Chandarpal stated that the LCDS seeks to use Guyana’s forests as a means to fight climate change. Further, the Strategy balances development and addresses the issues of climate change. The LCDS will not stop mining or forestry activities but will encourage their usage sustainably. In 2009, the LCDS was in the development stage and now in 2014, it is being implemented. Guyana has received payments for keeping its forests standing through a bilateral agreement with Norway. The payments are based on performance and are being used for national development through projects. There is a Joint Concept Note that guides the process by which payments are made. It was agreed that up to USD 250 million can be earned from this bilateral agreement by 2015. So far, Guyana has received USD 115 million. These monies are being spent on developmental projects such as Institutional Strengthening, Micro Small Enterprise Development, an Amerindian Development Fund, Amerindian Land Titling, an International Biodiversity Research Centre 5 and the Amaila Falls Hydropower Project. Other projects are being developed under the LCDS and will soon be implemented. The Honourable Minister Pauline Sukhai addressed participants on the critical role Indigenous Peoples (IP) play in the LCDS. She indicated that participation of the IP is important to the LCDS. But, there have been misconceptions that the Strategy is only geared for IP since the LCDS promotes the techniques used by Amerindians who have always acknowledged the sustainable utilisation of the forests. The LCDS is a developmental strategy used for the benefit of all Guyanese. It does not discriminate. The coast-landers and rural population are currently benefitting from the LCDS through several initiatives such as the Cunha Canal Rehabilitation project and the Micro and Small Enterprise Development project. Amerindians are receiving additional benefits from the Amerindian Development Fund where projects are being implemented based on Community Development Plans (CDPs). The CDPs have been criticised but they were developed by villages. A bottom-up approach was used. So far, 26 villages have received funding to implement their CDPs. Further, the LCDS does not discourage mining or forestry activities. Complaints about mining activities within and near villages need to be addressed if they are not permitted. Villagers were encouraged to contact the Ministry for any queries or clarifications they may have regarding these issues. 6 Key Issues Identified by Participants at the Session Name Community QUESTIONS/COMMENTS Responses (Minister Pauline Sukhai, Ms Gitanjali Chandarpal, Mr Navindra Persaud) Unknown Kato Indicated that a resident stated that he thinks that the APA is trying to trap Amerindians. The APA was trying to clamp Amerindians down, and he had expressed his views to Mr. Maxwell Andrew when he was trying to recruit him to be a part of the APA. He concluded by saying that the APA is not for him. Mr Maxwell Andrew Mr Christopher Samuels Kato Rebutted by saying that he had never followed the APA. He was not part of forming the current administration. Paramakatoi Stated his concerns regarding the extension of Paramakatoi’s land title. The community held a meeting and invited members from surrounding communities to attend. It was stated that if Paramakatoi accepts demarcation of land then they would not be able to extend the land because space will not be available. The issue was not a complaint against Mr Maxwell but rather when he was a Toshao. The APA was trying to create problems. It was a misunderstanding with how the statement was made. The current GoG has committed to ensuring that the Amerindian population has a secure tenure for their lands. In less than two years, GoG has titled twenty four (24) villages that were not mentioned in the Lands Commission Report. It is a big step for any Government to provide land security. 7 Name Community QUESTIONS/COMMENTS Responses (Minister Pauline Sukhai, Ms Gitanjali Chandarpal, Mr Navindra Persaud) Paramakatoi was titled since 1976 and the disagreement with the demarcation process does not place them in the best position. If someone goes and applies for land from the State, the application is first considered by the Guyana Lands and Survey Commission (GL&SC). It then goes to GoG for ratification and is returned to the GL&SC for approval. Then the next step is to demarcate based on that description of the land. Amerindians should think about securing their futures and not subjecting themselves to the vagaries of others. Paramakatoi does not want to demarcate because it believes if it does it will not have lands to extend later. There was a case in this area where villages were convinced that if they demarcate, they will not be able to extend their boundaries. However, some villages decided to demarcate and apply for more lands whereas others like Paramakatoi were left without any lands. If Paramakatoi was granted title for its land, the safest thing to do is to demarcate to find out where the boundaries of the lands are so that they can have evidence of these boundaries. 8 Name Community QUESTIONS/COMMENTS Responses (Minister Pauline Sukhai, Ms Gitanjali Chandarpal, Mr Navindra Persaud) Leaders should not be caught up with stories and should do what is right for their people and safeguard their future. There are funds currently available for demarcation and these should be utilised. Unknown Paramakatoi Stated her disappointment on the time spent by the visiting team with participants. Minister explained to the resident the limitations with the transportation system that the team has to utilise. Unknown Monkey Mountain 1. Stated that the Monkey Mountain village has been demarcated and had applied for an extension, and as such he questioned if another application has to be made and, 1. Monkey Mountain’s extension was listed in the LCDS to be addressed in year two (2), that is in 2015 when investigations will be conducted, with respect to the area that was applied for. Monies have also been allocated for consultations for the investigations for the titling and for the demarcation. 2. Queries were made on how solar panels for the village can be accessed. 2. Secondly, the Office of the Prime Minister has asked the Amerindian Ministry to help with the logistics to deliver solar panels to areas that have not received any of them to allow distribution in the fastest 9 Name Community Responses QUESTIONS/COMMENTS (Minister Pauline Sukhai, Ms Gitanjali Chandarpal, Mr Navindra Persaud) possible time. Unknown Taruka Noel Federicks Kato Leonus Peters Kurukabaru 1. Concerns were made on the distribution of LCDS awareness materials (books, posters etc.) in languages that are only understood by some. Suggestion was made to train members of the villages to better understand the LCDS. 2. There is confusion on demarcating boundaries of titled lands. The village is not satisfied with the progress on the matter. Enquiry was made on why the extension has been revoked. 1. Under the LCDS Outreach project there will be more tailored and more in depth sessions with various communities 2. GL&SC is well aware of Monkey Mountain’s demarcation and has updated the Ministry on the situation. The Minister is assured that the situation will be addressed to the satisfaction of all parties. 1. Enquiry on the status of the demarcation and certificate of title for the village was made. 2. There have been incidences where persons are coming into villages and cutting trees without permission. 1. The Certificate of Title was completed. Extension was applied for and the process was followed. His Excellency has received the map to verify with the surveyors whether the points were accurate. The matter was brought back to the village. Suggestion was made for the Toshao to sit with the previous Council to clarify what was done previously. The GoG did not take away the land. 2. The Village Council is responsible for granting access to persons to cut trees within the village. Suggestion was made for the Toshao to speak to the Ministry of Education (MoE) who has the project and is cutting the trees in the village. The MoE is not allowed to do so unless they have permission and/or is paying for cutting the trees. 10 Name Community QUESTIONS/COMMENTS Responses (Minister Pauline Sukhai, Ms Gitanjali Chandarpal, Mr Navindra Persaud) Derrick Williams Kamana - Clarification on the LCDS is needed. The books are confusing because it is written in very technical language and in not in the native language of many persons here. Suggestion is made for training sessions to be held in villages for persons to understand the LCDS. Mention was made of the LCDS Awareness and Outreach Programme that is being undertaken. - CDP proposals were submitted since 2010 and finance is flowing from Norway for this. Enquiry was made on the implementation schedules for these CDPs, in particular when the financing will become available. The process for accessing the money to fund the CDPs is long. The UN Assistant Secretary General was notified that the process for Guyana’s accessing money for CDPs is extremely long. Guyana was advised to ensure that there is proper involvement of civil society. Guyana is required to involve every person (nationally and internationally) in this matter. The process is long but Guyana is following procedure because of its Partner Entities requirements. - Application for extension was made for a titled and demarcated land but there was an issue. A letter was written and sent to the MoAA regarding this matter. Persons from Venezuela are cutting down trees because they are aware of the land not being owned. Efforts were made to curb these activities but the The first phase of the project is to implement 27 CDPs. The next phase has already been started so more projects will be funded but it will take time since the procedure for spending the money is stringent. 11 Name Community Responses QUESTIONS/COMMENTS (Minister Pauline Sukhai, Ms Gitanjali Chandarpal, Mr Navindra Persaud) persons are not listening. Therefore, it is requested that the extension of the land needs to be granted soon. Walter Edwins Kopinang Queries were made on the distribution of solar panels to power the the laptops from the One Laptop per Family project. The industrial panels (solar panels) to be used to power the laptops are not in the country as yet but as soon as the panels arrive in Guyana the GoG will begin the distribution process of laptops in the village. Sherry Balkaran Paramakatoi - - - - - Concern was raised that since this is campaigning time, a lot of politicians enter village without invitation letters. When these persons are confronted they do not listen. Advice is requested on how to deal with these persons. The Amerindian Act states that “If a Village refuses its consent in respect of large scale mining, a miner may carry out the mining activities if the Minister with responsibility for mining and the Minister declare that the mining activities are in the public interest”. Enquiry was made on what is meant by ‘public interest’ and if it is Amerindian land why should the decision by Amerindians be overruled. It was stated that there are many rules and regulations but whether they are being implemented is an issue. Persons have been entering Chinapau without consent and are mining. Amerindians were arrested by Police for hunting and - - The Village Council has the authority under the Law to provide permission. If anyone comes to your village, they need to report to the Village Council office and apply for permission. If permission is not granted, then the persons need to leave. If they refuse to leave, then the village Toshao, who are RCs, need to act in accordance with their duties. For those Toshaos that have not received their handcuffs, Minister Sukhai is willing to go to Ministry of Home Affairs on their behalf to ensure they receive them. Further, if outsiders come into a village and go to a villager instead of the Village Council, the villager needs to voice the decision of the village regarding outsiders. The Amerindian Act devolves its authority from the Government and places it with the Village Council. The Village Council needs to use this authority accordingly. If Chinapau has an issue or a position with respect to large scaled mining, then they can come to the MoAA and lodge a formal complaint. The MoAA has assisted 12 Name Community Responses QUESTIONS/COMMENTS (Minister Pauline Sukhai, Ms Gitanjali Chandarpal, Mr Navindra Persaud) fishing in Kaieteur. It is a way of life of Amerindians to hunt but the rules are preventing them from doing their traditional activities. - other villages to resolve these issues. Regarding hunting and fishing within Kaieteur Park, there are rules. If hunting and fishing are being done to feed your family, it is legal but if they are done for commercial purposes, then it is illegal. Benedict Philips Maik-Wak Request was made for extension of land. Maik-Wak is not recorded as an Amerindian village or community. It is a settlement that has mostly Amerindian residents. There are rules for dealing with Settlements. Land can be granted for those Settlements that do not meet the eligibility criteria within the Amerindian Act. It will be granted a lease and owned in a communal manner to ensure that everyone has a piece of land. Lester Edwin Kaibarupai 1. Enquiry was made as to why the land for the village was decreased when the surveyors were mapping the points for demarcation. 2. Request was made for workshop to be held to inform Toshaos of what is going on within the community and in country such as the solar panel project. 1. Every person who applied for land including extensions and demarcation will be called into the MoAA to talk about it. Toshaos will be asked for their approval before anything is granted. 2. The Office of Prime Minister has bought 460 panels for areas that have not received solar panels as yet. Adulton Lewis Kanopang There is $2 million allocated for the road contract but the road needs expanding from Kanopang to Penac. The relevant authority will need to deal with this matter. The authority responsible for this can try to insert it in their 2015 budget monies for the road expansion. The MoAA has budget issues and cannot commit itself in this regard. 13 Appendix A: List of Participants - Region 8 14 15 16 17 18