Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Questions Question 14 Evolutionary theories often emphasize that humans have adapted to their physical environment. One such theory hypothesizes that people should spontaneously follow a 24-hour cycle of sleeping and waking—even if they are not exposed to the usual pattern of sunlight. To test this notion, eight paid volunteers were placed (individually) in a room in which there was no light from the outside and no clocks or other indications of time. They could turn the lights on and off as they wished. After a month in the room, each individual tended to develop a steady cycle. Their cycles at the end of the study were as follows: 25, 27, 25, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 25.Using the 5% level of significance, what should we conclude about the theory that 24 hours is the natural cycle? (That is, does the average cycle length under these conditions differ significantly from 24 hours?) (a) Use the steps of hypothesis testing. (b) Sketch the distributions involved. (c) Explain your answer to someone who has never taken a course in statistics. Answer: a) Null hypothesis: µ = 24 Alternate hypothesis: µ ≠ 24 Sample mean = 25, Sample standard deviation = 1.195229 t-statistic = (25 – 24) / (1.195229/sqrt(8)) = 2.3664 t-critical = 2.3646 Since t-statistic is greater than critical value, we reject null hypothesis. We conclude that natural cycle isn’t 24 hours. b) c) Given the significance level, we find the critical value which defines the minimum difference between the mean and hypothesized value to make it statistically significant. We find our t-score is just greater than critical t, so this small difference is statistically significant, making natural cycle different from 24 hours. Question 18 Twenty students randomly assigned to an experimental group receive an instructional program; 30 in a control group do not. After 6 months, both groups are tested on their knowledge. The experimental group has a mean of 38 on the test (with an estimated population standard deviation of 3); the control group has a mean of 35 (with an estimated population standard deviation of 5). Using the .05 level, what should the experimenter conclude? (a) Use the steps of hypothesis testing, (b) sketch the distributions involved, and (c) explain your answer to someone who is familiar with the t test for a single sample, but not with the t test for independent means. Answer a) Null hypothesis: µ1 = µ2 Alternate hypothesis: µ1 ≠ µ2 Pooled standard deviation = sqrt((19*3^2+29*5^2)/(20+30-2)) = 4.32 t-statistic = (38 – 30)/(4.32*sqrt(1/20+1/30)) = 2.4056 degree of freedom = 20+30-2 = 48 t-critical = 2.0106 As t-statistic is greater than critical t, we reject null hypothesis. Scores for two groups are not same. The experimental group had seemingly higher scores. b) c) T-test for two sample independent means is same as using the t-test for single sample for the difference of two means. Only the standard error in this case is computed slightly differently as shown above using pooled standard deviation. Question 17 Do students at various colleges differ in how sociable they are? Twenty-five students were randomly selected from each of three colleges in a particular region and were asked to report on the amount of time they spent socializing each day with other students. The results for College X was a mean of 5 hours and an estimated population variance of 2 hours; for College Y, M = 4, S2 = 1.5; and for College Z, M = 6, S2 = 2.5. What should you conclude? Use the .05 level. (a) Use the steps of hypothesis testing, (b) figure the effect size for the study; and (c) explain your answers to (a) and (b) to someone who has never had a course in statistics. Answer a) Null hypothesis: Mean time for each college is same Alternate hypothesis: At least one mean is different Group mean = (5+4+6)/3 = 5 Between group variance = 25 * ((5-5)^2+(4-5)^2+(6-5)^2)/(3-1) = 25 Within group variance = (24*2+24*1.5+24*2.5)/(25+25+25-3) = 2 F-statistic = 25/2 = 12.5 Numerator degree of freedom = 3-1=2 Denominator degree of freedom = 3*25-3 = 72 F-critical = 3.1239 Since F-statistic is greater than critical value, we reject null hypothesis. Mean time of at least one college is different from others. b) Effect size = (25*2) / (25*2+2*72) = 0.2577 c) F-statistic is ratio of between group variance to within group variance. As the ratio increases, the probability of the means being different increases. Critical value is found out using significance level and the two degree of freedoms as shown above. Effect size shows times in one college can explain about 25.77% of the variations in the times of other colleges. Question 11 Make up a scatter diagram with 10 dots for each of the following situations: (a) perfect positive linear correlation, (b) large but not perfect positive linear correlation, (c) small positive linear correlation, (d) large but not perfect negative linear correlation, (e) no correlation, (f) clear curvilinear correlation. For problems 12, do the following: (a) Make a scatter diagram of the scores; (b) describe in words the general pattern of correlation, if any; (c) figure the correlation coefficient; (d) figure whether the correlation is statistically significant (use the .05 significance level, two-tailed); (e) explain the logic of what you have done, writing as if you are speaking to someone who has never heard of correlation (but who does understand the mean, deviation scores, and hypothesis testing); and (f) give three logically possible directions of causality, indicating for each direction whether it is a reasonable explanation for the correlation in light of the variables involved (and why). Question 12 Four research participants take a test of manual dexterity (high scores mean better dexterity) and an anxiety test (high scores mean more anxiety). The scores are as follows. Person-Dexterity-Anxiety 1 2 3 4 1 1 2 4 10 8 4 Negative 2 Answer a) b) There seems to be negative correlation. c) Correlation coefficient r = -0.979958 d) t-statistic= r*sqrt((n-2)/(1-r²))= -0.979958*sqrt(2/(1-(-0.979958)^2))=-6.957 p-value = 0.02 So, the correlation is statistically significant. e) Significance test as done above shows that the data above could not have occurred by chance. The higher the value of ‘r’ is, the more the test statistic deviates from zero. As the p-value is less than significance level, the correlation coefficient is statistically significant. f) High dexterity might cause less anxiety. Or, High anxiety might cause less dexterity. Or, a third external factor might simultaneously decrease dexterity and increase anxiety or vice-versa.