Electrostatics-Potential
... 1. It is zero at point B 2. It is a maximum at point B 3. It is a maximum at point C 4. It is the same at points A, B, and C. 11. In an electric field, 0.90 joule of work is required to bring 0.45 coulomb of charge from point A to point B. What is the electric potential difference between point ...
... 1. It is zero at point B 2. It is a maximum at point B 3. It is a maximum at point C 4. It is the same at points A, B, and C. 11. In an electric field, 0.90 joule of work is required to bring 0.45 coulomb of charge from point A to point B. What is the electric potential difference between point ...
BASIC CONCEPT OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY: A PATH FOR HIGH
... framed coherently just in the BCS theory (1957). Badía-Majós (2006), aiming to understand stable levitation when a magnet is posed on a superconductor, proposed a treatment of superconductors of I and II type to give into account Meissner effect as well as pinning where “the main concepts involved a ...
... framed coherently just in the BCS theory (1957). Badía-Majós (2006), aiming to understand stable levitation when a magnet is posed on a superconductor, proposed a treatment of superconductors of I and II type to give into account Meissner effect as well as pinning where “the main concepts involved a ...
Lecture 20. Perturbation Theory: Examples
... * An analytical solution is actually possible in this case but yields a result that differs by only 0.1% from Eq. 20.8 * An important result of our analysis is that in a quantum well formed between different semiconductors an electric field REDUCES the energy gap for electron-hole pair ...
... * An analytical solution is actually possible in this case but yields a result that differs by only 0.1% from Eq. 20.8 * An important result of our analysis is that in a quantum well formed between different semiconductors an electric field REDUCES the energy gap for electron-hole pair ...
PHYS 1112 In-Class Exam #2A Thu. March 19, 2009, 11:00am-12:15pm
... This is a closed-book, closed-notes exam. The last exam pages are sheets of formulae and numerical data for you to consult. The exam consists of 12 multiple-choice questions. Each question is worth one raw score point. There will be no penalty for wrong answers. No partial credit will be given. I re ...
... This is a closed-book, closed-notes exam. The last exam pages are sheets of formulae and numerical data for you to consult. The exam consists of 12 multiple-choice questions. Each question is worth one raw score point. There will be no penalty for wrong answers. No partial credit will be given. I re ...
Electrostatics-E Field
... If the magnitude of the electric force on the electron is 2.00 × 10-15 newton, the magnitude of the electric field strength between the charged plates is 1. 3.20 × 10-34 N/C 2. 2.00 × 10-14 N/C 3. 1.25 × 104 N/C 4. 2.00 × 1016 N/C 4. Two oppositely charged parallel metal plates, 1.00 centimeter ...
... If the magnitude of the electric force on the electron is 2.00 × 10-15 newton, the magnitude of the electric field strength between the charged plates is 1. 3.20 × 10-34 N/C 2. 2.00 × 10-14 N/C 3. 1.25 × 104 N/C 4. 2.00 × 1016 N/C 4. Two oppositely charged parallel metal plates, 1.00 centimeter ...
ECT1026 Field Theory
... Electric force is always in the direction of the electric field. The magnetic force is always perpendicular to the magnetic field ...
... Electric force is always in the direction of the electric field. The magnetic force is always perpendicular to the magnetic field ...
Homework #23 - Shirley Temple dolls
... 5. With the six particles held fixed, how much work would be required to bring a seventh particle of charge + Q from very far away and place it at the center of the circle? ...
... 5. With the six particles held fixed, how much work would be required to bring a seventh particle of charge + Q from very far away and place it at the center of the circle? ...
Casimir effect
In quantum field theory, the Casimir effect and the Casimir–Polder force are physical forces arising from a quantized field. They are named after the Dutch physicist Hendrik Casimir.The typical example is of two uncharged metallic plates in a vacuum, placed a few nanometers apart. In a classical description, the lack of an external field means that there is no field between the plates, and no force would be measured between them. When this field is instead studied using the QED vacuum of quantum electrodynamics, it is seen that the plates do affect the virtual photons which constitute the field, and generate a net force—either an attraction or a repulsion depending on the specific arrangement of the two plates. Although the Casimir effect can be expressed in terms of virtual particles interacting with the objects, it is best described and more easily calculated in terms of the zero-point energy of a quantized field in the intervening space between the objects. This force has been measured and is a striking example of an effect captured formally by second quantization. However, the treatment of boundary conditions in these calculations has led to some controversy.In fact, ""Casimir's original goal was to compute the van der Waals force between polarizable molecules"" of the metallic plates. Thus it can be interpreted without any reference to the zero-point energy (vacuum energy) of quantum fields.Dutch physicists Hendrik B. G. Casimir and Dirk Polder at Philips Research Labs proposed the existence of a force between two polarizable atoms and between such an atom and a conducting plate in 1947, and, after a conversation with Niels Bohr who suggested it had something to do with zero-point energy, Casimir alone formulated the theory predicting a force between neutral conducting plates in 1948; the former is called the Casimir–Polder force while the latter is the Casimir effect in the narrow sense. Predictions of the force were later extended to finite-conductivity metals and dielectrics by Lifshitz and his students, and recent calculations have considered more general geometries. It was not until 1997, however, that a direct experiment, by S. Lamoreaux, described above, quantitatively measured the force (to within 15% of the value predicted by the theory), although previous work [e.g. van Blockland and Overbeek (1978)] had observed the force qualitatively, and indirect validation of the predicted Casimir energy had been made by measuring the thickness of liquid helium films by Sabisky and Anderson in 1972. Subsequent experiments approach an accuracy of a few percent.Because the strength of the force falls off rapidly with distance, it is measurable only when the distance between the objects is extremely small. On a submicron scale, this force becomes so strong that it becomes the dominant force between uncharged conductors. In fact, at separations of 10 nm—about 100 times the typical size of an atom—the Casimir effect produces the equivalent of about 1 atmosphere of pressure (the precise value depending on surface geometry and other factors).In modern theoretical physics, the Casimir effect plays an important role in the chiral bag model of the nucleon; in applied physics, it is significant in some aspects of emerging microtechnologies and nanotechnologies.Any medium supporting oscillations has an analogue of the Casimir effect. For example, beads on a string as well as plates submerged in noisy water or gas illustrate the Casimir force.