GaAs quantum structures: Comparison between direct
... The band-edge energies at the zone center of the twodimensional Brillouin zone, calculated with the SBTC approximation and with the direct pseudopotential approach, are compared in Fig. 3~a! as a function of the film thickness L ~note that in the ^ 110& directions 1 GaAs ML . 2.0 Å!. In the ‘‘exact’ ...
... The band-edge energies at the zone center of the twodimensional Brillouin zone, calculated with the SBTC approximation and with the direct pseudopotential approach, are compared in Fig. 3~a! as a function of the film thickness L ~note that in the ^ 110& directions 1 GaAs ML . 2.0 Å!. In the ‘‘exact’ ...
Influence of a single lightning discharge on the intensity
... response on lightning discharge was observed (Fig. 5). Signal directly from the discharge was registered in the highest frequency range of 6.5–11 kHz (Fig. 5, ellipse 1), and the following sound wave at all the channels (Fig. 5, ellipse 2). According to the difference of arrival of these signals of ...
... response on lightning discharge was observed (Fig. 5). Signal directly from the discharge was registered in the highest frequency range of 6.5–11 kHz (Fig. 5, ellipse 1), and the following sound wave at all the channels (Fig. 5, ellipse 2). According to the difference of arrival of these signals of ...
Notes - Electrostatics
... Electric Flux through a closed surface is proportional to the charge enclosed by that surface: q ...
... Electric Flux through a closed surface is proportional to the charge enclosed by that surface: q ...
We don`t generally encounter forces, even in our theoretical studies
... What do these terms mean? While in ordinary life you and I would think of a strong force as one that can pull us off our feet and a weak force is one that we can counter by stiffening our muscles a little, that’s not what particle physicists mean at all. By “strong” and “weak”, particle physicists a ...
... What do these terms mean? While in ordinary life you and I would think of a strong force as one that can pull us off our feet and a weak force is one that we can counter by stiffening our muscles a little, that’s not what particle physicists mean at all. By “strong” and “weak”, particle physicists a ...
Nanopiezotronics
... quartz, wurtzite-structured crystals, Rochelle salt, lead zirconate titanate ceramics, barium titanate, and polyvinylidene flouride (a polymer film). When such a crystal is mechanically deformed, the positive- and negative-charge centers are displaced with respect to each other (Fig. 1). So while th ...
... quartz, wurtzite-structured crystals, Rochelle salt, lead zirconate titanate ceramics, barium titanate, and polyvinylidene flouride (a polymer film). When such a crystal is mechanically deformed, the positive- and negative-charge centers are displaced with respect to each other (Fig. 1). So while th ...
E2 ELECTRIC POTENTIAL
... You have already seen that electric field is force per charge and potential is potential energy per charge. So electric field and potential are linked in the same way that the concepts of force and potential energy are linked. You will recall, from chapter FE5, that change in potential energy is def ...
... You have already seen that electric field is force per charge and potential is potential energy per charge. So electric field and potential are linked in the same way that the concepts of force and potential energy are linked. You will recall, from chapter FE5, that change in potential energy is def ...
Vacuum Bubbles Nucleation and Dark Matter Production through
... The modern paradigms of physics are the standard Big Bang model of cosmology and the standard SU(3)C ⊗ SU(2)L ⊗ U(1)Y model of the strong and electroweak interactions. During the past two decades both models have been refined with the addition of two key ingredients: inflation on the cosmological si ...
... The modern paradigms of physics are the standard Big Bang model of cosmology and the standard SU(3)C ⊗ SU(2)L ⊗ U(1)Y model of the strong and electroweak interactions. During the past two decades both models have been refined with the addition of two key ingredients: inflation on the cosmological si ...
Casimir effect
In quantum field theory, the Casimir effect and the Casimir–Polder force are physical forces arising from a quantized field. They are named after the Dutch physicist Hendrik Casimir.The typical example is of two uncharged metallic plates in a vacuum, placed a few nanometers apart. In a classical description, the lack of an external field means that there is no field between the plates, and no force would be measured between them. When this field is instead studied using the QED vacuum of quantum electrodynamics, it is seen that the plates do affect the virtual photons which constitute the field, and generate a net force—either an attraction or a repulsion depending on the specific arrangement of the two plates. Although the Casimir effect can be expressed in terms of virtual particles interacting with the objects, it is best described and more easily calculated in terms of the zero-point energy of a quantized field in the intervening space between the objects. This force has been measured and is a striking example of an effect captured formally by second quantization. However, the treatment of boundary conditions in these calculations has led to some controversy.In fact, ""Casimir's original goal was to compute the van der Waals force between polarizable molecules"" of the metallic plates. Thus it can be interpreted without any reference to the zero-point energy (vacuum energy) of quantum fields.Dutch physicists Hendrik B. G. Casimir and Dirk Polder at Philips Research Labs proposed the existence of a force between two polarizable atoms and between such an atom and a conducting plate in 1947, and, after a conversation with Niels Bohr who suggested it had something to do with zero-point energy, Casimir alone formulated the theory predicting a force between neutral conducting plates in 1948; the former is called the Casimir–Polder force while the latter is the Casimir effect in the narrow sense. Predictions of the force were later extended to finite-conductivity metals and dielectrics by Lifshitz and his students, and recent calculations have considered more general geometries. It was not until 1997, however, that a direct experiment, by S. Lamoreaux, described above, quantitatively measured the force (to within 15% of the value predicted by the theory), although previous work [e.g. van Blockland and Overbeek (1978)] had observed the force qualitatively, and indirect validation of the predicted Casimir energy had been made by measuring the thickness of liquid helium films by Sabisky and Anderson in 1972. Subsequent experiments approach an accuracy of a few percent.Because the strength of the force falls off rapidly with distance, it is measurable only when the distance between the objects is extremely small. On a submicron scale, this force becomes so strong that it becomes the dominant force between uncharged conductors. In fact, at separations of 10 nm—about 100 times the typical size of an atom—the Casimir effect produces the equivalent of about 1 atmosphere of pressure (the precise value depending on surface geometry and other factors).In modern theoretical physics, the Casimir effect plays an important role in the chiral bag model of the nucleon; in applied physics, it is significant in some aspects of emerging microtechnologies and nanotechnologies.Any medium supporting oscillations has an analogue of the Casimir effect. For example, beads on a string as well as plates submerged in noisy water or gas illustrate the Casimir force.