Lecture 8
... Push it up same hill so it goes up 0.25 m in moving 0.5 m. Friction force was 0.3 weight. Now add some gritty sand so friction larger, 0.5 weight. How much is the energy that turns into heat though friction compared to energy in grav. potential energy? (heat J)/(grav. energy). a. They are the same, ...
... Push it up same hill so it goes up 0.25 m in moving 0.5 m. Friction force was 0.3 weight. Now add some gritty sand so friction larger, 0.5 weight. How much is the energy that turns into heat though friction compared to energy in grav. potential energy? (heat J)/(grav. energy). a. They are the same, ...
Answers 7
... Q = CV, so the charge is equal to its 90% of its final value when V(t) is equal to 90% of its final value. The final value of V(t) is 5 V. Therefore, the required value of t is given by 5 = 3 for ...
... Q = CV, so the charge is equal to its 90% of its final value when V(t) is equal to 90% of its final value. The final value of V(t) is 5 V. Therefore, the required value of t is given by 5 = 3 for ...
According to Newton`s ______ law, an object with no net force
... Explain why acquiring a large excess static charge (e.g., pulling off a wool cap, touching a Van de Graaff generator, combing) affects your hair. Explain why an attractive force results from bringing a charged object near a neutral object. Determine the new electric force on charged objects after th ...
... Explain why acquiring a large excess static charge (e.g., pulling off a wool cap, touching a Van de Graaff generator, combing) affects your hair. Explain why an attractive force results from bringing a charged object near a neutral object. Determine the new electric force on charged objects after th ...
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota Physics
... Physics 1102, Introductory Physics II, Midterm 2 Practise 1. Consider a charge distribution on three thin metal plates separated from each other by distances d as shown. The charge on the top plate is +Q, the charge on the next plate down is -2Q/3 and the charge on the bottom plate is -Q/3. The area ...
... Physics 1102, Introductory Physics II, Midterm 2 Practise 1. Consider a charge distribution on three thin metal plates separated from each other by distances d as shown. The charge on the top plate is +Q, the charge on the next plate down is -2Q/3 and the charge on the bottom plate is -Q/3. The area ...
Lecture 10 (Feb 15) - West Virginia University
... An Eskimo pulls a sled loaded with salmon. The total mass of the sled and the salmon is 50kg. The Eskimo exerts a force of magnitude 1.2·102 N on the sled by pulling on the rope. A. How much work does he do on the sled, if the rope is horizontal to the ground and he pulls the sled 5 m? B. How much w ...
... An Eskimo pulls a sled loaded with salmon. The total mass of the sled and the salmon is 50kg. The Eskimo exerts a force of magnitude 1.2·102 N on the sled by pulling on the rope. A. How much work does he do on the sled, if the rope is horizontal to the ground and he pulls the sled 5 m? B. How much w ...
The Equivalent Rest-mass of Photon
... Principle: “it represents the connection between inertial mass and energy” [3]. Thus, according to this Law, if we wish to study the inertial mass of a particle, it seems important to consider first the inertial energy of the particle itself, which should correspond, be equivalent, just to its possi ...
... Principle: “it represents the connection between inertial mass and energy” [3]. Thus, according to this Law, if we wish to study the inertial mass of a particle, it seems important to consider first the inertial energy of the particle itself, which should correspond, be equivalent, just to its possi ...
SPH OA - mackenziekim
... Assume that an electron is in a near circular orbit, radius 1.6 x 1010 m, about a helium nucleus: a) What is the electric field at the position of the electron? (1.13 x 1011 N/C) b) What is the electric force on the electron? (1.81 x 108 N) c) What is the electric potential at the position of the ...
... Assume that an electron is in a near circular orbit, radius 1.6 x 1010 m, about a helium nucleus: a) What is the electric field at the position of the electron? (1.13 x 1011 N/C) b) What is the electric force on the electron? (1.81 x 108 N) c) What is the electric potential at the position of the ...
Fields Review - mackenziekim
... Assume that an electron is in a near circular orbit, radius 1.6 x 1010 m, about a helium nucleus: a) What is the electric field at the position of the electron? (1.13 x 1011 N/C) b) What is the electric force on the electron? (1.81 x 108 N) c) What is the electric potential at the position of the ...
... Assume that an electron is in a near circular orbit, radius 1.6 x 1010 m, about a helium nucleus: a) What is the electric field at the position of the electron? (1.13 x 1011 N/C) b) What is the electric force on the electron? (1.81 x 108 N) c) What is the electric potential at the position of the ...
Casimir effect
In quantum field theory, the Casimir effect and the Casimir–Polder force are physical forces arising from a quantized field. They are named after the Dutch physicist Hendrik Casimir.The typical example is of two uncharged metallic plates in a vacuum, placed a few nanometers apart. In a classical description, the lack of an external field means that there is no field between the plates, and no force would be measured between them. When this field is instead studied using the QED vacuum of quantum electrodynamics, it is seen that the plates do affect the virtual photons which constitute the field, and generate a net force—either an attraction or a repulsion depending on the specific arrangement of the two plates. Although the Casimir effect can be expressed in terms of virtual particles interacting with the objects, it is best described and more easily calculated in terms of the zero-point energy of a quantized field in the intervening space between the objects. This force has been measured and is a striking example of an effect captured formally by second quantization. However, the treatment of boundary conditions in these calculations has led to some controversy.In fact, ""Casimir's original goal was to compute the van der Waals force between polarizable molecules"" of the metallic plates. Thus it can be interpreted without any reference to the zero-point energy (vacuum energy) of quantum fields.Dutch physicists Hendrik B. G. Casimir and Dirk Polder at Philips Research Labs proposed the existence of a force between two polarizable atoms and between such an atom and a conducting plate in 1947, and, after a conversation with Niels Bohr who suggested it had something to do with zero-point energy, Casimir alone formulated the theory predicting a force between neutral conducting plates in 1948; the former is called the Casimir–Polder force while the latter is the Casimir effect in the narrow sense. Predictions of the force were later extended to finite-conductivity metals and dielectrics by Lifshitz and his students, and recent calculations have considered more general geometries. It was not until 1997, however, that a direct experiment, by S. Lamoreaux, described above, quantitatively measured the force (to within 15% of the value predicted by the theory), although previous work [e.g. van Blockland and Overbeek (1978)] had observed the force qualitatively, and indirect validation of the predicted Casimir energy had been made by measuring the thickness of liquid helium films by Sabisky and Anderson in 1972. Subsequent experiments approach an accuracy of a few percent.Because the strength of the force falls off rapidly with distance, it is measurable only when the distance between the objects is extremely small. On a submicron scale, this force becomes so strong that it becomes the dominant force between uncharged conductors. In fact, at separations of 10 nm—about 100 times the typical size of an atom—the Casimir effect produces the equivalent of about 1 atmosphere of pressure (the precise value depending on surface geometry and other factors).In modern theoretical physics, the Casimir effect plays an important role in the chiral bag model of the nucleon; in applied physics, it is significant in some aspects of emerging microtechnologies and nanotechnologies.Any medium supporting oscillations has an analogue of the Casimir effect. For example, beads on a string as well as plates submerged in noisy water or gas illustrate the Casimir force.