 
									
								
									Principle of Mathematical Induction
									
... n + 1 = pq = ( p1 p1 pm )( q1q2 qn ) . Hence P ( n + 1) is true and so by the principle of strong induction P ( n) is true for all n ≥ 2 . ...
                        	... n + 1 = pq = ( p1 p1 pm )( q1q2 qn ) . Hence P ( n + 1) is true and so by the principle of strong induction P ( n) is true for all n ≥ 2 . ...
									Lesson 2
									
... Definition: semantics (meaning) of formulas The truth-value valuation of propositional symbols is a mapping v that to each propositional symbol p assigns a truth value, i.e., a value from the set {1,0}, which codes the set {True, False}: {pi}  {1,0} The truth-value function of a PL formula is a fu ...
                        	... Definition: semantics (meaning) of formulas The truth-value valuation of propositional symbols is a mapping v that to each propositional symbol p assigns a truth value, i.e., a value from the set {1,0}, which codes the set {True, False}: {pi}  {1,0} The truth-value function of a PL formula is a fu ...
									A systematic proof theory for several modal logics
									
... KS, that is, system SKS without the rules of the up-fragment. Since this is so closely related to cut-elimination in the sequent calculus, we may call this result cut-elimination for the calculus of structures. 3. We can restrict the interaction, cut, weakening and contraction rules to atoms, by whi ...
                        	... KS, that is, system SKS without the rules of the up-fragment. Since this is so closely related to cut-elimination in the sequent calculus, we may call this result cut-elimination for the calculus of structures. 3. We can restrict the interaction, cut, weakening and contraction rules to atoms, by whi ...
									completeness theorem for a first order linear
									
... for the rst order temporal logics with since and until over linear time and rationals were given in [16]. In the case of FOLTL (and similarly when the ow of time is isomorphic to reals or integers) the set of valid formulas is not recursively enumerable, and there is no recursive axiomatization of ...
                        	... for the rst order temporal logics with since and until over linear time and rationals were given in [16]. In the case of FOLTL (and similarly when the ow of time is isomorphic to reals or integers) the set of valid formulas is not recursively enumerable, and there is no recursive axiomatization of ...
									Herbrand Theorem, Equality, and Compactness
									
... We can now state our simplified proof method, which applies to sets of ∀-sentences without =: Simply take ground instances of sentences in Φ until a propositionally unsatisfiable set Φ0 is found. The method does not specify how to check for propositional unsatisfiability: any method (such as truth ...
                        	... We can now state our simplified proof method, which applies to sets of ∀-sentences without =: Simply take ground instances of sentences in Φ until a propositionally unsatisfiable set Φ0 is found. The method does not specify how to check for propositional unsatisfiability: any method (such as truth ...
									On the Consistency and Correctness of School
									
... that time many mathematicians believed not only that mathematics contains absolute truth, but also that all mathematical concepts can be precisely defined, removing any ambiguity as to their meaning. This again happens to be false. Any chain of definitions has to start with some undefined terms. (In ...
                        	... that time many mathematicians believed not only that mathematics contains absolute truth, but also that all mathematical concepts can be precisely defined, removing any ambiguity as to their meaning. This again happens to be false. Any chain of definitions has to start with some undefined terms. (In ...
									Chapter 1: Inductive Sets of Data
									
... Simplifies description of inductive data types ::= 0
 ::= ( . )
 ...
																	    
                        	... Simplifies description of inductive data types
									Chapter 1: Inductive Sets of Data
									
... Simplifies description of inductive data types ::= 0, 1, 2, …
 ::= ( )
 ::= ( . )
 ...
																	     
                        	... Simplifies description of inductive data types
Mathematical proof
 
                        In mathematics, a proof is a deductive argument for a mathematical statement. In the argument, other previously established statements, such as theorems, can be used. In principle, a proof can be traced back to self-evident or assumed statements, known as axioms. Proofs are examples of deductive reasoning and are distinguished from inductive or empirical arguments; a proof must demonstrate that a statement is always true (occasionally by listing all possible cases and showing that it holds in each), rather than enumerate many confirmatory cases. An unproved proposition that is believed true is known as a conjecture.Proofs employ logic but usually include some amount of natural language which usually admits some ambiguity. In fact, the vast majority of proofs in written mathematics can be considered as applications of rigorous informal logic. Purely formal proofs, written in symbolic language instead of natural language, are considered in proof theory. The distinction between formal and informal proofs has led to much examination of current and historical mathematical practice, quasi-empiricism in mathematics, and so-called folk mathematics (in both senses of that term). The philosophy of mathematics is concerned with the role of language and logic in proofs, and mathematics as a language.
 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									![1 How to Read and Do Proofs [1]](http://s1.studyres.com/store/data/007906654_1-0e74ecf2d08f104b19f4236120932fc3-300x300.png) 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									 
									