• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
RELATIVE KAZHDAN PROPERTY
RELATIVE KAZHDAN PROPERTY

... 1967. Since then, many consequences and characterizations have been given by various authors. The notion of relative Property for a pair (G, N ), where N is a normal subgroup in G was implicit in Kazhdan’s paper, and later made explicit by Margulis [Mar1]. The case when H is an abelian normal subgro ...
IDEAL FACTORIZATION 1. Introduction
IDEAL FACTORIZATION 1. Introduction

... has no prime factorization then let n > 1 be minimal without a prime factorization. Of course n is not prime, so n = ab with a, b > 1. Then a, b < n, so a and b are products of primes. Hence n = ab is a product of primes, which is a contradiction. Uniqueness of the prime factorization requires more ...
A Few New Facts about the EKG Sequence
A Few New Facts about the EKG Sequence

3.4.1 Distinct Real Roots
3.4.1 Distinct Real Roots

f1.3yr1 abstract algebra introduction to group theory
f1.3yr1 abstract algebra introduction to group theory

The Cookie Monster Problem
The Cookie Monster Problem

Section 4.3 - The Chinese Remainder Theorem
Section 4.3 - The Chinese Remainder Theorem

... Since 8 and 9 are relatively prime, we can use the Chinese remainder theorem to solve the congruences x≡1 x≡3 ...
K-theory of Waldhausen categories
K-theory of Waldhausen categories

Elementary Number Theory: Primes, Congruences
Elementary Number Theory: Primes, Congruences

RSA Cryptosystem and Factorization
RSA Cryptosystem and Factorization

3 Congruence arithmetic
3 Congruence arithmetic

An Introduction to Algebra and Geometry via Matrix Groups
An Introduction to Algebra and Geometry via Matrix Groups

ARE THERE INFINITELY MANY TWIN PRIMES
ARE THERE INFINITELY MANY TWIN PRIMES

Number Theory - FIU Faculty Websites
Number Theory - FIU Faculty Websites

Connectedness in Ideal Bitopological Spaces
Connectedness in Ideal Bitopological Spaces

Matrix Groups
Matrix Groups

... can then define the orthogonal and symplectic group with respect to the bilinear forms. The tools we introduce allow us to determine the generators for the general linear group, the orthogonal group, the symplectic group, and their special subgroups. We then determine the centers of these groups. Th ...
Algebra 1 Study Guide Answer Section
Algebra 1 Study Guide Answer Section

... 24) Graph the system of equations. Then determine whether the system has no solution, one solution, or infinitely many solutions. If the system has one solution, name it. ...
Grade 6 – Number and Operation
Grade 6 – Number and Operation

Modeling Chebyshev`s Bias in the Gaussian Primes as a Random
Modeling Chebyshev`s Bias in the Gaussian Primes as a Random

[Chap. 2] Pythagorean Triples (b) The table suggests that in every
[Chap. 2] Pythagorean Triples (b) The table suggests that in every

FT12
FT12

... One solutions Two solutions More than two solutions The number of solutions of the equation | x | = cos x is (a) One (b) Two (c) Three (d) Zero If 3 x+1 = 6 log23 then x is (a) 3 (b) 2 (c) log32 (d) log23 If ( 2 ) x  ( 3 ) x  ( 13 ) x / 2 then the number of values of x is (a) 2 (b) 4 (c) 1 (d) Non ...
1 Introduction Math 120 – Basic Linear Algebra I
1 Introduction Math 120 – Basic Linear Algebra I

... The line becomes the coordinate axis, with origin O, and each vector on the line is characterized by the coordinate of the position vector w.r.t basis B = {~e}. If ~a = c~e, then ~a is characterized by the coordinate: ~a ↔ c. Using the coordinate axis: Also, if ~a = a~e and ~b = b~e, then ~a + ~b = ...
A Transition to Advanced Mathematics
A Transition to Advanced Mathematics

Directed graphs
Directed graphs

Chapter 10 - Complex Numbers
Chapter 10 - Complex Numbers

... number (x 1 yi) satisfying ______ ​ a 1 bi   ​5 x 1 yi; hence, it is sufficient to find ...
< 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... 480 >

Fundamental theorem of algebra

The fundamental theorem of algebra states that every non-constant single-variable polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one complex root. This includes polynomials with real coefficients, since every real number is a complex number with an imaginary part equal to zero.Equivalently (by definition), the theorem states that the field of complex numbers is algebraically closed.The theorem is also stated as follows: every non-zero, single-variable, degree n polynomial with complex coefficients has, counted with multiplicity, exactly n roots. The equivalence of the two statements can be proven through the use of successive polynomial division.In spite of its name, there is no purely algebraic proof of the theorem, since any proof must use the completeness of the reals (or some other equivalent formulation of completeness), which is not an algebraic concept. Additionally, it is not fundamental for modern algebra; its name was given at a time when the study of algebra was mainly concerned with the solutions of polynomial equations with real or complex coefficients.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report