
syllabus outcomes
... interpret and use scales in photographs, plans and drawings found in the media and/or other learning areas (Applying Strategies, Communicating) enlarge diagrams such as cartoons and pictures ...
... interpret and use scales in photographs, plans and drawings found in the media and/or other learning areas (Applying Strategies, Communicating) enlarge diagrams such as cartoons and pictures ...
G8-3-Solving Right Triangles
... Use trigonometric ratios to find angle measures in right triangles and to solve real-world problems. ...
... Use trigonometric ratios to find angle measures in right triangles and to solve real-world problems. ...
Unit 9: Inverse Trigonometric Functions π π sin ( ) or arcsin( ) y x y x
... SSA – The ambiguous case. When given two sides and a non-included angle, there are three different scenarios: a) No triangle b) One, unique triangle c) Two different triangles (since you will be solving for an angle with SSA, see if another triangle is possible by subtracting the acute angle found w ...
... SSA – The ambiguous case. When given two sides and a non-included angle, there are three different scenarios: a) No triangle b) One, unique triangle c) Two different triangles (since you will be solving for an angle with SSA, see if another triangle is possible by subtracting the acute angle found w ...
Chapter 3 Angles and Lines
... Construct a line parallel to another line through a given point. (traditional only) draw any line m draw arcs –same setting using vertex Q, and P ...
... Construct a line parallel to another line through a given point. (traditional only) draw any line m draw arcs –same setting using vertex Q, and P ...
Ch. XI Circles
... To prove this theorem, I will continue to use the strategies I have used before. First, I will draw the picture with the information given to me. Second, I will add lines so I can relate this to problems I have solved before, and third I will label the diagram. In this proof, I will be able to const ...
... To prove this theorem, I will continue to use the strategies I have used before. First, I will draw the picture with the information given to me. Second, I will add lines so I can relate this to problems I have solved before, and third I will label the diagram. In this proof, I will be able to const ...
InvestigatingAngles gem
... 5. Select Vertical angles and turn on Show angle measures. Drag point A until AOB is a right angle. A. What is true about the four angles formed? Experiment to see if this is always true. B. Explain why this is always the case. ...
... 5. Select Vertical angles and turn on Show angle measures. Drag point A until AOB is a right angle. A. What is true about the four angles formed? Experiment to see if this is always true. B. Explain why this is always the case. ...
Perceived visual angle
In human visual perception, the visual angle, denoted θ, subtended by a viewed object sometimes looks larger or smaller than its actual value. One approach to this phenomenon posits a subjective correlate to the visual angle: the perceived visual angle or perceived angular size. An optical illusion where the physical and subjective angles differ is then called a visual angle illusion or angular size illusion.Angular size illusions are most obvious as relative angular size illusions, in which two objects that subtend the same visual angle appear to have different angular sizes; it is as if their equal-sized images on the retina were of different sizes. Angular size illusions are contrasted with linear size illusions, in which two objects that are the same physical size do not appear so. An angular size illusion may be accompanied by (or cause) a linear size illusion at the same time.The perceived visual angle paradigm begins with a rejection of the classical size–distance invariance hypothesis (SDIH), which states that the ratio of perceived linear size to perceived distance is a simple function of the visual angle. The SDIH does not explain some illusions, such as the Moon illusion, in which the Moon appears larger when it is near the horizon. It is replaced by a perceptual SDIH, in which the visual angle is replaced by the perceived visual angle. This new formulation avoids some of the paradoxes of the SDIH, but it remains difficult to explain why a given illusion occurs.This paradigm is not universally accepted; many textbook explanations of size and distance perception do not refer to the perceived visual angle, and some researchers deny that it exists. Some recent evidence supporting the idea, reported by Murray, Boyaci and Kersten (2006), suggests a direct relationship between the perceived angular size of an object and the size of the neural activity pattern it excites in the primary visual cortex.