hp1f2013_class15_rolling_motion_and_accelerating_frames
... Principle of Equivalence In the example problem, we treated acceleration A in the same way as we treated gravitational acceleration. The Principle of Equivalence states that there is no way to distinguish locally* between a gravitational acceleration and an acceleration of the coordinate system. *L ...
... Principle of Equivalence In the example problem, we treated acceleration A in the same way as we treated gravitational acceleration. The Principle of Equivalence states that there is no way to distinguish locally* between a gravitational acceleration and an acceleration of the coordinate system. *L ...
Newton`s Second Law
... • Engine Force (FE) – Force applied to propel the train along the tracks. • Opposition Force (Fo) – friction between the tracks, wind resistance, etc. that attempts to slow the train down. • Which force was larger? • What is the acceleration of the train? Negative, Zero, or Positive. • Is this an eq ...
... • Engine Force (FE) – Force applied to propel the train along the tracks. • Opposition Force (Fo) – friction between the tracks, wind resistance, etc. that attempts to slow the train down. • Which force was larger? • What is the acceleration of the train? Negative, Zero, or Positive. • Is this an eq ...
Newton`s Second Law
... In physics, the distinction between strength, weight and mass is very important in explaining the behavior of objects. Body mass, as mentioned above, corresponds to an inherent property of bodies, whereas weight corresponds to a measure of interaction between the planet and a body on its surface. It ...
... In physics, the distinction between strength, weight and mass is very important in explaining the behavior of objects. Body mass, as mentioned above, corresponds to an inherent property of bodies, whereas weight corresponds to a measure of interaction between the planet and a body on its surface. It ...
Chapter 5 Forces
... • Kinematics: Describes how an object moves • Dynamics: Describes why an object moves • Newton’s three laws of motion, describe the “dynamics” of why objects move ...
... • Kinematics: Describes how an object moves • Dynamics: Describes why an object moves • Newton’s three laws of motion, describe the “dynamics” of why objects move ...
Work done (J) - MrSimonPorter
... Ft = mv – mu The quantity Ft is called the impulse, and of course mv – mu is the change in momentum (v = final velocity and u = initial velocity) Impulse = Change in momentum ...
... Ft = mv – mu The quantity Ft is called the impulse, and of course mv – mu is the change in momentum (v = final velocity and u = initial velocity) Impulse = Change in momentum ...
Part I
... • Circumference = Distance Around= 2πr Speed: v = (2πr/T) = 2πrf Centripetal Acceleration: ...
... • Circumference = Distance Around= 2πr Speed: v = (2πr/T) = 2πrf Centripetal Acceleration: ...
Newton's theorem of revolving orbits
In classical mechanics, Newton's theorem of revolving orbits identifies the type of central force needed to multiply the angular speed of a particle by a factor k without affecting its radial motion (Figures 1 and 2). Newton applied his theorem to understanding the overall rotation of orbits (apsidal precession, Figure 3) that is observed for the Moon and planets. The term ""radial motion"" signifies the motion towards or away from the center of force, whereas the angular motion is perpendicular to the radial motion.Isaac Newton derived this theorem in Propositions 43–45 of Book I of his Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, first published in 1687. In Proposition 43, he showed that the added force must be a central force, one whose magnitude depends only upon the distance r between the particle and a point fixed in space (the center). In Proposition 44, he derived a formula for the force, showing that it was an inverse-cube force, one that varies as the inverse cube of r. In Proposition 45 Newton extended his theorem to arbitrary central forces by assuming that the particle moved in nearly circular orbit.As noted by astrophysicist Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar in his 1995 commentary on Newton's Principia, this theorem remained largely unknown and undeveloped for over three centuries. Since 1997, the theorem has been studied by Donald Lynden-Bell and collaborators. Its first exact extension came in 2000 with the work of Mahomed and Vawda.