
Backwards and Forwards - Cornell Math
... R = hR; +, ×, −, 0, 1i. If we let A be the set of all real algebraic numbers (i.e. roots of integer polynomials), and restrict our interpretations to A, we obtain an elementary substructure A = hA; +, ×, −, 0, 1i of R. In the language of partial orders, take the real numbers with their usual orderin ...
... R = hR; +, ×, −, 0, 1i. If we let A be the set of all real algebraic numbers (i.e. roots of integer polynomials), and restrict our interpretations to A, we obtain an elementary substructure A = hA; +, ×, −, 0, 1i of R. In the language of partial orders, take the real numbers with their usual orderin ...
A Judgmental Reconstruction of Modal Logic
... connective should be locally sound and complete in order to have a satisfactory meaning explanation for the connective. Local soundness and completeness are witnessed by local reductions and expansions of proofs, respectively. Note that there are other ways to define meaning. For example, we frequen ...
... connective should be locally sound and complete in order to have a satisfactory meaning explanation for the connective. Local soundness and completeness are witnessed by local reductions and expansions of proofs, respectively. Note that there are other ways to define meaning. For example, we frequen ...
On counting permutations by pairs of congruence classes of major
... In this section we present bijective proofs for some of the results derived in Sections 3 and 2. Recall that this paper was originally motivated by the algebraic discovery of the formula (A). We now give a bijective proof of (A), which is the special case k = n, ` = n−1 of Theorem 3.1, namely mn (i\ ...
... In this section we present bijective proofs for some of the results derived in Sections 3 and 2. Recall that this paper was originally motivated by the algebraic discovery of the formula (A). We now give a bijective proof of (A), which is the special case k = n, ` = n−1 of Theorem 3.1, namely mn (i\ ...
Mathematical Logic
... To save parentheses in quantified formulas, we use a mild form of the dot notation: a dot immediately after ∀x or ∃x makes the scope of that quantifier as large as possible, given the parentheses around. So ∀x.A → B means ∀x(A → B), not (∀xA) → B. We also save on parentheses by writing e.g. Rxyz, Rt ...
... To save parentheses in quantified formulas, we use a mild form of the dot notation: a dot immediately after ∀x or ∃x makes the scope of that quantifier as large as possible, given the parentheses around. So ∀x.A → B means ∀x(A → B), not (∀xA) → B. We also save on parentheses by writing e.g. Rxyz, Rt ...
On -adic Saito-Kurokawa lifting and its application
... of critical values of L-functions plays a key role in Iwasawa-Greenberg Main Conjectures, which connect it to the size of Selmer groups. And the special values of automorphic L-functions are closely related to Eisenstein series via Rankin’s method [Ran]. Garrett [Ga1], [Ga2], Böcherer [Bo1], [Bo2] ...
... of critical values of L-functions plays a key role in Iwasawa-Greenberg Main Conjectures, which connect it to the size of Selmer groups. And the special values of automorphic L-functions are closely related to Eisenstein series via Rankin’s method [Ran]. Garrett [Ga1], [Ga2], Böcherer [Bo1], [Bo2] ...
An introduction to ampleness
... with a dimension on it. We build it from finite structures each of which carries in a natural way a dimension. We will not describe the whole construction here: what we do will produce a structure of infinite Morley rank. To obtain a structure of finite Morley rank, the method needs an extra ingredi ...
... with a dimension on it. We build it from finite structures each of which carries in a natural way a dimension. We will not describe the whole construction here: what we do will produce a structure of infinite Morley rank. To obtain a structure of finite Morley rank, the method needs an extra ingredi ...